On 03.08.2011 14:46, Fuchs, Martin wrote:
Hi !
Does anyone have mutual-RSA-IPSec VPN working with 2.0 ?
All settings I tried do not work, I always get errors:
racoon: ERROR: failed to get subjectAltName
racoon: ERROR:
racoon: ERROR: no peer's CERT payload found.
These errors are away as
From: madhu_sek...@mahindrasatyam.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:02:12 +
Subject: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0-RC1 installation problem
Dear Support Team
Greetings.
I have downloaded pfSense-2.0-RC1-i386-20110226-1530.iso and tried to install
it in
Op 11-4-2011 22:46, Paul Mather schreef:
On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
Funnily enough, I had tried OpenVPN in this environment quite a while
ago (not with pfSense, though) but gave up because I couldn't get
Tunnelblick working smoothly. I don't remember exactly what
On Apr 11, 2011, at 4:07 PM, RB wrote:
I'm actually pretty interested in the fact that on the surface it
looks like 2.0 can support the OS X 10.6 native Cisco VPN client out
of the box. Has anyone had any success doing so? OpenVPN and
Viscosity/Tunnelblick are nice, but not having to pay
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.eduwrote:
Plus, I don't know how well-supported OpenVPN is on devices such as the
iPad and iPhone. But, in the absence of it works for me responses for
IPsec on Mac OS X, I may just have to try it. :-)
iOS does not have
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
iOS does not have OpenVPN built in. I never looked to see if some app
provides it, but I highly doubt it.
one more point... the only VPN we've ever succeeded with iOS devices is the
PPTP client, but that's just not a very
Am 12.04.2011 um 17:21 schrieb Vick Khera:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu wrote:
Plus, I don't know how well-supported OpenVPN is on devices such as the iPad
and iPhone. But, in the absence of it works for me responses for IPsec on
Mac OS X, I may
Am 12.04.2011 17:21, schrieb Vick Khera:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.eduwrote:
Plus, I don't know how well-supported OpenVPN is on devices such as the
iPad and iPhone. But, in the absence of it works for me responses for
IPsec on Mac OS X, I may just have
I have IPSec from my iPhone To pfsense here...
Have a look at the Forums. It took some Time but now it works...
Am 12.04.2011 um 17:24 schrieb Vick Khera
vi...@khera.orgmailto:vi...@khera.org:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Vick Khera
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Fuchs, Martin
martin.fu...@trendchiller.com wrote:
I have IPSec from my iPhone To pfsense here...
Have a look at the Forums. It took some Time but now it works...
I found in the forum that it requires pfSense 2.0. Does that still stand
true?
And do you
On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Fuchs, Martin
martin.fu...@trendchiller.com wrote:
I have IPSec from my iPhone To pfsense here...
Have a look at the Forums. It took some Time but now it works...
I found in the forum that it requires pfSense
I use 2.0 and configure via GUI only, no hacks.
The only Problem is the users privilege as a local user - Admin works for me
so far, but a ticket is already opened. The local user is for xauth.
Am 12.04.2011 um 21:18 schrieb Vick Khera
vi...@khera.orgmailto:vi...@khera.org:
On Tue, Apr 12,
That's strange, my config works with NAT-T too, but i never had problems with
non-natted, natted or any other network.
Am 12.04.2011 um 21:46 schrieb Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu:
On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Fuchs, Martin
I'm very happily using OpenVPN with Viscosity and TunnelBlick (clients) on
many Mac 10.5-10.7 machines. I'm currently using 1.2.3 at the perimeter and
a 2.0 box to manage my certs (which I hope to roll over to the perimeter box
once we upgrade for the sake of being able to download the pre-loaded
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.eduwrote:
Has anyone managed to get IPsec for mobile clients working with pfSense 2.0
and Mac OS X 10.6? If so, which client are you using on the Mac OS X side?
Is anything special needed on the pfSense side?
I *used* to use
Install the open VPN client package on 2.0 - two clicks and you're done !
Viscosity is your best bet.
So straightforward, your grandma could do It.
;-)
Le 11 avr. 2011 à 18:19, Vick Khera a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu wrote:
Has anyone
On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu wrote:
Has anyone managed to get IPsec for mobile clients working with pfSense 2.0
and Mac OS X 10.6? If so, which client are you using on the Mac OS X side?
Is anything
I'm actually pretty interested in the fact that on the surface it
looks like 2.0 can support the OS X 10.6 native Cisco VPN client out
of the box. Has anyone had any success doing so? OpenVPN and
Viscosity/Tunnelblick are nice, but not having to pay $9/client and
not installing additional
Op 6-3-2011 23:26, Bao Ha schreef:
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note.
According to the forum, it should not be a problem. :-(
It is not.
When we first got the reports of corrupted CFs, we just overnighted new
ones. Then, those died shortly, within a week or two. We replaced a
complete system:
Hi Seth,
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
Op 6-3-2011 23:26, Bao Ha schreef:
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note.
According to the forum, it should not be a problem. :-(
It is not.
I have had three systems with corrupted flash memory: two with the Kingston
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Bao Ha b...@hacom.net wrote:
Something happened in BETA5 and it was carried into RC1, up to today
snapshot: 20110306-0859.
I see this in my embedded BETA5 install at home (I should upgrade soon
to RC1 I suppose...)
I see no significant amount of writing to it.
Someone already made a bugreport http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1279
http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1279 ;)
_
Van: Bao Ha [mailto:b...@hacom.net]
Verzonden: zondag 6 maart 2011 23:06
Aan: customersupp...@pfsense.org
CC: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: [pfSense Support]
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note.
According to the forum, it should not be a problem. :-(
Unfortunately, mounting RW without NOATIME will pounce on the compact flash
everytime a READ is made. It will kill the CF sooner or later.
When we first got the reports of corrupted CFs, we just overnighted
filesystem
Hope this problem will be solved soon!
With regards,
Bart
_
Van: Bao Ha [mailto:b...@hacom.net]
Verzonden: zondag 6 maart 2011 23:26
Aan: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 RC1 Nanobsd Problem
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note
On Sun, March 6, 2011 19:26, Bao Ha wrote:
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note.
According to the forum, it should not be a problem. :-(
Unfortunately, mounting RW without NOATIME will pounce on the compact
flash
everytime a READ is made. It will kill the CF sooner or later.
When we first got
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Michel Servaes mic...@mcmc.be wrote:
Hi,
Have posted it on the forum too, I think that the 512MB images have no use
anymore.
Yesterday I tried to update to the latest snapshot, but it told me that the
file was corrupted.
When checking into SSH, I saw that
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
After an upgrade to this morning’s snap, I received the following after the
upgrade/reboot (it’s what’s on my PuTTY atm):
Syncing OpenVPN settings...done.
Starting syslog...done.
Configuring
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Dimitri Rodis dimit...@integritasystems.com
wrote:
After an upgrade to this morning's snap, I received the following
after the upgrade/reboot (it's what's on my PuTTY atm):
Syncing OpenVPN settings...done.
Starting syslog...done.
Configuring
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
After an upgrade to this morning’s snap, I received the following after the
upgrade/reboot (it’s what’s on my PuTTY atm):
This looks a lot like what's being discussed here, although I don't
see the em driver
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Maik Heinelt m...@vegasystems.com wrote:
On 2011/01/13 9:20, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Charles N Wyble
char...@knownelement.com wrote:
Same here. No PPPOE support.
It works fine for the vast majority, there are some edge cases
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Maik Heinelt m...@vegasystems.com wrote:
Well, if I can help
We have a PPPoE line for developing tests.
I could setup a pfsense 2.0 Beta5 box and make you ssh login to it.
Then you, or other pfsense developer can debug it.
That would be ideal, was going
On 2011/01/14 2:50, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Maik Heineltm...@vegasystems.com wrote:
Well, if I can help
We have a PPPoE line for developing tests.
I could setup a pfsense 2.0 Beta5 box and make you ssh login to it.
Then you, or other pfsense developer can
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Maik Heinelt m...@vegasystems.com wrote:
These days, I want to give verson 2.0 a try, but it doesn't really work for
me.
Till now, we used pfsense 1.2.3 and our PPPoE configuration worked without
any trouble.
But if I setup pfsense 2.0 Beta 5 with exact the
On 2011/01/12 17:22, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Maik Heineltm...@vegasystems.com wrote:
These days, I want to give verson 2.0 a try, but it doesn't really work for
me.
Till now, we used pfsense 1.2.3 and our PPPoE configuration worked without
any trouble.
But if I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2011 12:30 AM, Maik Heinelt wrote:
On 2011/01/12 17:22, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Maik Heineltm...@vegasystems.com
wrote:
These days, I want to give verson 2.0 a try, but it doesn't really
work for
me.
On 2011/01/13 3:43, Charles N Wyble wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2011 12:30 AM, Maik Heinelt wrote:
On 2011/01/12 17:22, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Maik Heineltm...@vegasystems.com
wrote:
These days, I want to give verson 2.0 a
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Charles N Wyble
char...@knownelement.com wrote:
Same here. No PPPOE support.
It works fine for the vast majority, there are some edge cases that
don't work and we don't know why yet at this point. Send logs, it
doesn't work isn't helpful.
On 2011/01/13 9:20, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Charles N Wyble
char...@knownelement.com wrote:
Same here. No PPPOE support.
It works fine for the vast majority, there are some edge cases that
don't work and we don't know why yet at this point. Send logs, it
On 2011/01/13 9:20, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Charles N Wyble
char...@knownelement.com wrote:
Same here. No PPPOE support.
It works fine for the vast majority, there are some edge cases that
don't work and we don't know why yet at this point. Send logs, it
?-Original Message-
From: Sean Cavanaugh Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:39 PM To:
support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 :
IPv6?
?that helped out a lot. now I at the point of where it is fully set up but
I cannot seem to get any response from
Hi Sean,
Op 23-12-2010 14:01, Sean Cavanaugh schreef:
?-Original Message-
From: Sean Cavanaugh Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:39 PM To:
support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 :
IPv6?
Verified with wireshark that the DHCPv6 requests are going out
?-Original Message-
From: Seth Mos
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:13 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 : IPv6?
Hi Sean,
Op 23-12-2010 14:01, Sean Cavanaugh schreef:
?-Original Message-
From: Sean Cavanaugh Sent: Wednesday
?Update::
I have IPv6 successfully running up to the pfsense box and I can ping out as
far as the Server IPv6 address but cannot get anything beyond that.
Destination Net Unreachable
I will dig deeper into it this afternoon .
Op 21-12-2010 22:50, Sean Cavanaugh schreef:
?ok. I got past the gitsync by hitting enter and letting it actually
continue.
now after the sync I get the nice error
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_SL in /etc/inc/vslb.inc on line
291
Oops my bad. I merged up with the current 2.0 code
?that helped out a lot. now I at the point of where it is fully set up but I
cannot seem to get any response from the DHCPv6 server. I am installing
wireshark on another comp to make sure my desktop is even sending out the
requests.
Op 21-12-2010 1:52, Sean Cavanaugh schreef:
after that, it asks if I want to sync with master which doesn’t do
anything.
It says press enter if done. Press enter. ;-)
The procedure for entering custom urls is that you enter it the 1st
time, accept and then press enter to signal it to start.
?ok. I got past the gitsync by hitting enter and letting it actually
continue.
now after the sync I get the nice error
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_SL in /etc/inc/vslb.inc on line 291
this shows up in both console mode and in the web interface as well as shuts
down all firewall
IPv6 support does not get in pfSense till v2.1
pfSense itself does not offer support (yet), the underlying OS (FreeBSD 7.2
in my case) does :) -
I managed to get an IPv6 tunnel working in pfSense 1.2.3, while the clients
hooked up to my network can use that tunnel.
Bart
-Oorspronkelijk
There is a post in the forum, to my git branch and instructions for support on
2.0 BETA
http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/ipv6/
I'm currently using it in production on a carp cluster and appears to work fine
for basic firewalling.
Regards,
Seth
Op 20 dec 2010, om 20:19 heeft Bart Grefte het
?-Original Message-
From: Seth Mos
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 2:37 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 : IPv6?
There is a post in the forum, to my git branch and instructions for support
on 2.0 BETA
http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/ipv6
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Sean Cavanaugh
millenia2...@hotmail.com wrote:
?-Original Message-
From: Seth Mos
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 2:37 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 : IPv6?
There is a post in the forum, to my git branch
That's just telling you it's not one of the official URLs, just tell it
yes.
after that, it asks if I want to sync with master which doesn’t do anything.
-
Or alternatively you may enter a custom
Not sure what you are requesting. I do static PPPoE all the time. The carrier
assigns a static to your login. It has nothing to do with a router function
unless I am missing something.
--Original Message--
From: drova...@kaluga-gov.ru
To: support@pfsense.com
ReplyTo:
Resurrecting an old thread.
I just tried installing pfSense 2.0 embedded on a new box. It's not
working and of course I don't have a serial port on any PC around me.
Guess what I DO have ... VGA and a keyboard.
Are there any plans to get VGA support added soon-ish?
Regards,
-Jeppe
I'm playing a bit with the traffic shaper and noticed that if I edit a
firewall rule, only none is available for Ackqueue/Queue. In the
rule summary, the queues are displayed (e.g. qACK/qOthersLow). Thus if
I try to edit a rule generated by the traffic shaper wizard, the queues
are lost.
Fixed
I noticed that a week or so ago and posted it in the forums with no response. I
know it worked correctly 2-3 weeks ago. All the queues seem to get built, but
nothing shows in the Queue view in the shaper or firewall rules. It also seems
traffic only makes it to the default queue when you look
If anyone comes across this on the archives, due to the lack of a
compiler et all I found no way to achieve compiling SA on pfSense
(probably could have compiled in on a FreeBSD box and moved everything
over but that seems too arse-about-tit to me). I have virtualized
pfSense on a CentOS box and
On 21/10/10 14:23, James Bensley wrote:
If anyone comes across this on the archives, due to the lack of a
compiler et all I found no way to achieve compiling SA on pfSense
pfsense is based on freebsd 7.2, get a copy here...
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/7.2-RELEASE/
you
argh, sorry, I didn't see the 2.0 bit... don't know which version it
uses, but the same would apply, use pkg_add and if needed set the env
var so it can find the package repository.
but I would advise grabbing the appropriate version of freebsd and using
that as a build platform rather than
On 21 October 2010 15:07, Paul Mansfield it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
argh, sorry, I didn't see the 2.0 bit... don't know which version it
uses, but the same would apply, use pkg_add and if needed set the env
var so it can find the package repository.
but I would advise grabbing the
So, one step at a time is always a good approach, and I am falling
down at the first step ;)
Its proving awkward to even compile Spam Assassin so I can try it in a
jail as pfSense doesn't have the 'make' command in it, it shows up in
the the FreeBSD ports but I can't compile the source without
Hi,
Yeah if you can run VMware ESXi on the box and then run whatever VMs you
need, that's a good solution. Or you can look at the jailctl package and
run a full jail for spamassassin and whatever else you want to throw on it.
This is in production at one site atleast, a all in one wonder with
Op 13-10-2010 23:55, James Bensley schreef:
Thank you too all for your input.
I think running two VMs on top of the host OS (although it would be
nice) is too much overhead for my liking given the spec of the box. I
like the sound of jailctl, I will give this a go and report back my
findings ;)
On 10/13/2010 1:37 PM, James Bensley wrote:
Hi List,
I would like to put Spam Assassin on a pfSense 2.0 box and I see that
here (http://www.pfsense.com/packages/pkg_config.xml) it is listed as
a package to install but doesn't show up in my package list on my 2.0
box, is this the package
On 13 October 2010 19:00, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
You'd be better of installing SpamAssassin on a box that isn't a secure
firewall. :-)
Sadly the isn't an option for me, I'm setting up a network edge box to
run pfSense, SpamAssassin, ClamAV, Squid and Squidgaurd to filter all
traffic
- Original Message -
From: James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 2:22:00 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 and SpamAssassin
On 13 October 2010 19:00, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
You'd be better of installing
On Oct 13, 2010, at 7:37 PM, James Bensley wrote:
Hi List,
I would like to put Spam Assassin on a pfSense 2.0 box and I see that
here (http://www.pfsense.com/packages/pkg_config.xml) it is listed as
a package to install but doesn't show up in my package list on my 2.0
box, is this the package
On 13 October 2010 19:30, Gordon Russell russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
You may want to look at untangle then.
http://www.untangle.com
I have seen that before but sadly this isn't an option either, we are
a non-profit and although they do discounted prices my budget is
£0.00.. Thats why I
On Oct 13, 2010, at 9:10 PM, James Bensley wrote:
*scratches head* I could virtualise /both/ pfSense and SA on the same
box as separate VMs??!?...again I'd rather not...or would I? Noodle
baker!
Yeah if you can run VMware ESXi on the box and then run whatever VMs
you need, that's a good
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 08:38:38PM +0200, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 7:37 PM, James Bensley wrote:
Hi List,
I would like to put Spam Assassin on a pfSense 2.0 box and I see that
here (http://www.pfsense.com/packages/pkg_config.xml) it is listed as
a package to install but
- Original Message -
From: James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 3:10:00 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 and SpamAssassin
On 13 October 2010 19:30, Gordon Russell russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
You may want to look
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Gordon Russell
russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
The base version of untangle is free
Aside from the hardware, with its considerable bloat, the hardware
available may not be able to accommodate that scenario. Though if the
hardware can run ESXi, putting it on a VM
- Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Gordon Russell
russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
The base version of untangle is free
Aside from the hardware, with its considerable bloat, the hardware
available may not be able to accommodate that
Thank you too all for your input.
I think running two VMs on top of the host OS (although it would be
nice) is too much overhead for my liking given the spec of the box. I
like the sound of jailctl, I will give this a go and report back my
findings ;)
--
Regards,
James.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Gordon Russell
russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
Why cobble together a VM scenario to do that, when there is packaged, simple,
free software achieve his ends? I don't know that a VM'ed scenario would be
any less resource intensive than untangle. It would
Is there another place where to ask such questions?
Regards,
Tonino
Il 09/09/2010 11:20, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto:
I'm trying to understand better these two new features:
L7 layer
I cannot see where these container can be created, and if they
apply only to shaping or if they
Thanks... I see no dates at all.
About 2.0, I see no documentation around. Is there a list where to ask
for 2.0 features explained?
I see a lot of new things, sometimes hard to understand.
Thanks,
Tonino
Il 07/09/2010 23:58, Jim Pingle ha scritto:
On 9/7/2010 5:08 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati)
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati)
to...@interazioni.it wrote:
Thanks... I see no dates at all.
About 2.0, I see no documentation around. Is there a list where to ask for
2.0 features explained?
Generally speaking, the forum is where most discussion around 2.0
happens,
On 9/8/10 10:42 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Thanks... I see no dates at all.
| When stable version is planned to be released?
Tonino
[snip snip]
The release will happen when it's ready, but hopefully that translates
to sometime later this year.
Jim
This when is 2.0 being released
On 9/8/2010 1:42 PM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
http://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/roadmap
Thanks... I see no dates at all.
Correct. No dates. It will be ready when it's ready. :)
About 2.0, I see no documentation around. Is there a list where to ask
for 2.0 features explained?
I
On 9/7/2010 5:08 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Is there any updated roadmap for pfsense 2.0?
When stable version is planned to be released?
Closest thing to a roadmap is here:
http://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/roadmap
The release will happen when it's ready, but hopefully that
Hi,
Op 4-8-2010 17:40, Curtis Maurand schreef:
On 8/3/2010 11:15 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
You could probably mitigate some of the writes to disk by having the
logging sent to a syslog server elsewhere inside the house that is using
traditional write media. That should lengthen the life of the
On 05/08/10 07:53, Seth Mos wrote:
Do note, that if you ever write the device from start to end that this
negates the wear levelling. It then only has the spare cells on the
drive or card to remap blocks (~7%).
does freeBSD support trim with SSDs?
Op 5-8-2010 16:44, Paul Mansfield schreef:
On 05/08/10 07:53, Seth Mos wrote:
Do note, that if you ever write the device from start to end that this
negates the wear levelling. It then only has the spare cells on the
drive or card to remap blocks (~7%).
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Johan Hendriks
j.hendr...@schavemaker.com wrote:
does freeBSD support trim with SSDs?
as of Freebsd 8.1 it is.
read the following:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.1R/relnotes-detailed.html#DISKS
Very interesting. I see this in the latest build log for 2.0:
On Aug 5, 2010, at 5:20 PM, David Burgess wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Johan Hendriks
j.hendr...@schavemaker.com wrote:
does freeBSD support trim with SSDs?
as of Freebsd 8.1 it is.
read the following:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.1R/relnotes-detailed.html#DISKS
On 8/3/2010 11:15 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 09:22:41AM -0500, Karl Fife wrote:
We're going to build up just such a system in just a few months after we
close a couple of open projects. Has anyone done this already, have
experience to share?
I'm running 3
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Karl Fife karlf...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want to run the full version on embedded, there are lots of SSD's
these days with wear-leveling subsystems to address the write endurance
issue of nand flash memory. Some SSD's (such as Intel's newest SSD family)
even
, have
experience to share?
-Karl
- Original Message -
From: Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PFSENSE 2.0
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Jeppe Øland jol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 09:22:41AM -0500, Karl Fife wrote:
We're going to build up just such a system in just a few months after we
close a couple of open projects. Has anyone done this already, have
experience to share?
I'm running 3 pfSense full installation on flash/SSDs.
One is an
none of the devices on which I run embedded even *have* VGA, so I disagree.
If you have a full system, just run the full release.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Anil Garg garg_art2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think VGA with embedded is now major convenience issue.
Am 01.08.2010 22:01, schrieb Chris Buechler:
You're using polling, so that's to be expected.
Thanks for hte hint!
fabiana
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
From: Vick Khera vi...@khera.org
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Mon, August 2, 2010 7:47:30 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PFSENSE 2.0
none of the devices on which I run embedded even *have* VGA, so I disagree. If
you have a full system, just run the full release
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
none of the devices on which I run embedded even *have* VGA, so I disagree.
If you have a full system, just run the full release.
I know the embedded version tries to write as little as possible on
the drive in order to increase
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Jeppe Øland jol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
none of the devices on which I run embedded even *have* VGA, so I disagree.
If you have a full system, just run the full release.
I know the embedded version
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
none of the devices on which I run embedded even *have* VGA, so I disagree.
If you have a full system, just run the full release.
I know the embedded version tries to write as little as possible on
the drive in order to
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Jeppe Øland jol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
none of the devices on which I run embedded even *have* VGA, so I disagree.
If you have a full system, just run the full release.
I know the embedded version
Am 01.08.2010 02:02, schrieb Chris Buechler:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Fabian Abplanalp
fabian.abplan...@bug.ch wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler:
Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description, system
is what's using the CPU, so if you're pushing a
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Fabian Abplanalp
fabian.abplan...@bug.ch wrote:
Am 01.08.2010 02:02, schrieb Chris Buechler:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Fabian Abplanalp
fabian.abplan...@bug.ch wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler:
Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say
convenience issue.
Anil Garg
+1 408-221-7725
- Original Message
From: Anil Garg garg_art2...@yahoo.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Fri, July 30, 2010 9:30:10 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PFSENSE 2.0
Thanks Vick. I can wait for a week if its so cheap and costs me just a few
clicks
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
