Hello,
It seems that recent embedded images do not have standard flash card
sizes.
Is it a deliberate choice (take the image and adapt it to suit your
needs) or a mistake (no answer found in the lists archives) ?
Regards
Éric Masson
--
Si ça ne produit rien (biomagnétisme insuffisant),
We are trying to reduce the image size. The recent versions now even run from
64 MB CF-Cards. As the embedded images don't support packages there is no need
to inflate them with emptyness if 64 MB is everything that's needed. Dump that
image to whatever size of CF-card you have (=64 MB). You
Well, the next entry would be
GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0a is ufs/pfSense.
I think, it is a good Idea to downgrade to a pre-geom version!?!
This lighttpd wasn't a good thing either (IMHO)
Am 07.12.2005 um 11:46 schrieb William Armstrong:
Timecounter TSC frequency 199433220 Hz quality
Hi
I have a lot of Problems with the actual pfSense (One thing was the
Panics mentiond before) the other thing: the httpd-Daemon dies, here
a truss
fcntl(3,F_SETFD,0x1) = 0 (0x0)
fcntl(3,F_SETFL,0x6) = 0 (0x0)
When I connect via pppoe server on LAN I can download at 50
KB/sec when on Lan directly I can download at 200KB/sec
This reconciles with my uplink. Can anyone shed some light
on this for me please???
I'd actually like to install some addition packages on my wrap units.
(Perl, Nagios-NRPE, for monitoring the boxes as well as some additional
scripting stuff)
Last time I asked about this Scott said he was going to look into getting
instructions updated to do an image resize.
Thanks
John
1. What version? ALWAYS include this information when emailing.
2. What where you doing when it died? Status-Queues by chance?
On 12/7/05, Tom Müller-Kortkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a lot of Problems with the actual pfSense (One thing was the
Panics mentiond before) the other
I`m sorry for HTML mail.
A./Also there is strange, that in traffic shaper isn`t any RULE which is
generrally valid for all non specified users.
There are only rules which manage various services,protocols and ports.
B./If I have configure Pfsense in dual WAN mode, and use PRTG paessler
Just trying to get pftpx working over an ipsec tunnel. Even with
all the ftp helpers off it still seems like there is a helper enabled
somewhere.
Can anyone shed some light on how I can configure the
helpers to work correctly.
ftp
pfsense
ipsec tunnel
pfsense
lan
pppoe
If you have the helper disabled for the interface in question, there
should not be a rdr rule for it in /tmp/rules.debug.
Can you check to see if it is still adding a redirect?
On 12/7/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just trying to get pftpx working over an ipsec tunnel. Even with
If you build the traffic shaping rules for lan-wan will
it treat traffic destined to an IPsec tunnel as a part of that? Essentially Im
just looking to give priority to VoIP traffic anything else would be below
that. Even if it could be done on the LAN interface regardless of
destination.
IPSEC cannot be shaped (yet).
Scott
On 12/7/05, John Cianfarani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you build the traffic shaping rules for lan-wan will it treat traffic
destined to an IPsec tunnel as a part of that? Essentially I'm just looking
to give priority to VoIP traffic anything else would
At 11:29 PM 12/7/2005, you wrote:
IPSEC cannot be shaped (yet).
yes and no. ESP/AH, no, but if you're doing nat-traversal, that's
encapsulated in UDP packets, so that would work, no?
Scott
On 12/7/05, John Cianfarani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you build the traffic shaping rules for
It would be a pfSense-pfSense ESP - IPSec tunnel.
I was also wonder if you could even shape everything out of the Lan port
regardless of destination (wan,ipsec,dmz).
Thanks
John
-Original Message-
From: Dan Swartzendruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005
14 matches
Mail list logo
