Hi,
I have a Real IPs OPT1 ( X.X.X.100 ), OPT2 ( X.X.X.101 ) , OPT2 ( X.X.X.102
) , OPT2 ( X.X.X.103 ) on interfaces and Lan interfeces is 10.0.1.1
How can I change default gateway on 10.0.1.5, Normal default gateway is WAN
IP but I want make 10.0.1.15 Ip's default gateway OPT1
Can you help
From: Koray AGAYA [mailto:insanad...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 December 2009 09:44
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Multiple Gateway
Hi,
I have a Real IPs OPT1 ( X.X.X.100 ), OPT2 ( X.X.X.101 ) , OPT2 (
X.X.X.102 ) , OPT2 ( X.X.X.103 ) on interfaces and Lan interfeces
Hi,
I have problem in configuration the load balance in pfsense. I am configure,
but not get work the squid. My clients in Squid not balance, but In clients
out squid get balance normally.
Anybody know why???
[]'s
Rafael Cristian
2009/12/4 Gabriel - IP Guys gabr...@impactteachers.com:
Dear All,
Is it possible to slow down packets that come to and from a particular IP or
alias on a particular port – I have a rsync sessions going on in the
background, and I do not want them to ever use more than 5% of the total
Since I came from a 'pf' environment, I had used tables
to list piles of IPs (CIDRs) that were known spammers and the like.
Mostly APIC...
Is there any way to setup a table within pfSense?
I would like to be able to upload (or ssh into and create) a table
and then have pfSense use it for BLOCK
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schuh [mailto:michael.sc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 December 2009 11:23
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Intentionally slow down traffic on
certain ports/ips
2009/12/4 Gabriel - IP Guys gabr...@impactteachers.com:
Dear All,
On 12/4/09 6:28 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
pfSense has a 3 tables already setup to be used for blocking.
sshlockout
virusprot
snort2c
The last one is evaluated first in all versions of pfSense.
While the others evaluate first on the upcoming 2.0 version.
On 2.0 aliases means table while i cannot
2009/12/4 Gabriel - IP Guys gabr...@impactteachers.com:
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schuh [mailto:michael.sc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 December 2009 11:23
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Intentionally slow down traffic on
certain ports/ips
2009/12/4
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schuh [mailto:michael.sc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 December 2009 11:23
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Intentionally slow down traffic on
certain ports/ips
2009/12/4 Gabriel - IP Guys gabr...@impactteachers.com:
Dear All,
2009/12/4 Gabriel - IP Guys gabr...@impactteachers.com:
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schuh [mailto:michael.sc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 December 2009 11:23
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Intentionally slow down traffic on
certain ports/ips
2009/12/4
snipped excess quoting - please learn to trim!
On 04/12/09 11:02, Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
Basically, what I want to do is have traffic come in on my secondary
ISP, and return packets return out the correct interface, instead of
being blocked. Is that possible?
what people initially thought
I have been asked to monitor traffic, per user through our openvpn pfsense
setup, as its
setup for filtering (Therefor I know what ip each user uses), I presume this
can easily be
done by looking at traffic between the opt int and the lan int.
Are there provisions built in to pfsense to make
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have been asked to monitor traffic, per user through our openvpn pfsense
setup, as its
setup for filtering (Therefor I know what ip each user uses), I presume this
can easily be
done by looking at traffic between the opt int and the lan int.
Are there provisions
On 04/12/09 16:08, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have been asked to monitor traffic, per user through our openvpn
pfsense setup, as its
setup for filtering (Therefor I know what ip each user uses), I
presume this can easily be
done by looking at traffic between the opt int and the lan int.
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Gabriel - IP Guys
gabr...@impactteachers.com wrote:
Dear All,
I have multiple ISP’s connected to my pfSense box, but only the ISP that is
configured as the WAN seems to be able to route traffic.
That's how it works by default.
If you have your OpenVPN tun interface assigned as an OPT, you can
probably use any of the existing bandwidth monitoring software packages:
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/How_can_I_monitor_bandwidth_usage%3F
Wow, the ntop package out of the box displayed what I needed exactly as I
wanted.
No
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Rafael Cristian rcristia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have problem in configuration the load balance in pfsense. I am configure,
but not get work the squid. My clients in Squid not balance, but In clients
out squid get balance normally.
Anybody know why???
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko evg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:
By the way last time I checked UDP OpenVpn it did not work this way.
Incoming packet comes on OPTx outgoing comes out of WAN. There was no such
problem with TCP. Is it known issue?
Works fine when configured
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Gabriel - IP Guys
gabr...@impactteachers.com wrote:
Basically, what I want to do is have traffic come in on my secondary
ISP, and return packets return out the correct interface, instead of
being blocked. Is that possible?
Yes, and that's how it works by
In message d64aa1760912041123v2e92448fi3bc780947235c...@mail.gmail.com
Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org was claimed
to have wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Rafael Cristian rcristia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have problem in configuration the load balance in pfsense. I am configure,
but
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Dave Warren
dave-use...@djwcomputers.com wrote:
In message d64aa1760912041123v2e92448fi3bc780947235c...@mail.gmail.com
Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org was claimed
to have wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Rafael Cristian rcristia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thank you.
But is version 2.0 now is available
-Mensagem original-
De: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] Em nome de Chris
Buechler
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2009 18:10
Para: support@pfsense.com
Assunto: Re: [pfSense Support] Re: PFsense + Load Balance +
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Rafael Cristian rcristia...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you.
But is version 2.0 now is available
Yes, but it is alpha-alpha (soon to be alpha): http://snapshots.pfsense.org/
Scott
-
To
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Rafael Cristian rcristia...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you.
But is version 2.0 now is available
Yes, but it is alpha-alpha (soon to be alpha):
In other words - unless you can fix
Ok. I await the final version.
thanks again.
2009/12/4 Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Rafael Cristian rcristia...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you.
But is version 2.0 now is available
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, mehma sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com wrote:
1.2.3-RC3, nanobsd on a Netgate Alix board with 256 MB RAM and a 8GB CF
card. The firmware and all have been updated.
Have been playing around with this box as a firewall for the last couple of
weeks. Then I did the
Have a PFSense firewall for one of my users. We where using Shrewsoft
vpn with mobile vpn setup. They were able to have a tunnel open at his
home office from both his desktop and laptop at the same time. I believe
there were both running Vista.
Now they are both on Win7 . Bring up the first
27 matches
Mail list logo
