Guten Tag Niklas Bolmdahl,
am Samstag, 8. März 2008 um 11:54 schrieben Sie:
hmm, I'd like to say more, but I'm out of time... hopefully I got some
of what I wanted to say across.
I guess: Yes, thank you!
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niklas Bolmdahl spake unto us the following wisdom:
But there is discussion here, and the devs are listening and taking
peoples views into account. They have stated that perhaps this new
functionality wasn't the best (side note, I didn't like it, but I'm
content waiting for the next
On 08/03/2008, Niklas Bolmdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something that you have to get used to if you constantly update your
software is that things change, and not always in a fashion that you
yourself approve of. You also have to learn that it's seldom the first
iteration of a feature
Hi,
Festival.Star schrieb:
- We ARE NOT interested in reverting behavior just because some vocal
group of users don't like it but can't come up with any reason why it.
- Sorry but that is not right. Every usere except one has written a lot
of reasons why they don't like that feature. The
On 05/03/2008, Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You get more flies with honey, or something like that. These people
threatening to ditch Pidgin if this change isn't fixed is just
amusing. You aren't costing the developers any money, but like I
said, you're entiteled to a 100% refund
Marek Matulka:
I see your point - no one is paying for it so developers shouldn't
care about users.
What is the purpose of software without users ?
;-)
David
___
Support mailing list
Support@pidgin.im
At 01:11 AM 3/6/2008, Marek Matulka wrote:
On 05/03/2008, Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You get more flies with honey, or something like that. These people
threatening to ditch Pidgin if this change isn't fixed is just
amusing. You aren't costing the developers any money, but like I
At 10:53 AM 3/5/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using it on a long time, and as strange as it may seem, the
whole reason I switched to Pidgin is because I've used other clients that
had non-resizable text input fields and found this unacceptable.
SNIP
and I find that I am unable to use
See my previous reply. But seriously.. Life is too short. If this is
a make or break situation for you to find another IM client.. WOW.
Well, see, the whole problem is that I moved to Pidgin for precisely this
reason -- because other IM clients wanted to limit the size of my input
text box.
Although I have no dog in this hunt, I see folks' point. As a
workaround, can someone offer up the right line in the right source-code
file to change 4 to 10 (or whatever). Then one could just edit the line
and recompile!
Pete
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 10:53 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ethan,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:01:42PM -0500, Peter Spotts wrote:
Although I have no dog in this hunt, I see folks' point. As a
workaround, can someone offer up the right line in the right source-code
file to change 4 to 10 (or whatever). Then one could just edit the line
and recompile!
Pete
Evan Platt wrote:
At 01:04 PM 3/5/2008, Marek Matulka wrote:
You get more flies with honey, or something like that. These people
threatening to ditch Pidgin if this change isn't fixed is just
amusing. You aren't costing the developers any money, but like I
said, you're entiteled to a 100%
12 matches
Mail list logo
