On 20 Jul., 03:46, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid wrote:
On 07/19/2011 10:36 AM, Michael Gordon wrote:
Bill Spikowski wrote:
chokito wrote:
I received an e-mail thats not show the attachment.
- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
- Content-Type: video/x-ms-wmv;
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 16.07.2011 22:15, JeffM wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Graham wrote:
I'm liking Seamonkey less and less
[Large amounts of text elided]
Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:58:08 -0500, Rob C.
robc...@comcast.spambone.net in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
That sounds about the same as I would have done except there
is one other set of files I would have moved Import these
in the same way you did the other set. Hopefully these will
help:
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Hmmm. I've already used this analogy once today (elsewhere).
Sometimes it only takes ONE individual to affect a change:
http://google.com/search?tbs=dfn:1q=hung-jury
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
OK, so if I dedicate my life to making sure everyone knows
that it's Effect
On 11-07-19 9:57 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Agreed, it's valuable. But it's incomplete, just as your testing was
incomplete until someone using a different-language version tried it.
Good example.
Code used in Firefox and Thunderbird have quite a bit of automated
testing. See
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
John wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/19/11 3:18 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/19/11 10:10 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced
On 07/20/2011 10:15 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
...
See problem #672665 in Bugzilla.
Dick
Thanks. I added it to my watch list.
Problem #672665 has been marked Closed Duplicate because it duplicates
#512378. Apparently, some 2.x update of SM removed Java-specific
Since I updated to 2.2 My filters are not always automatically sorting
incoming email. They sort some but not most of the messages. If I run
the filters manually they work as expected.
They are all set to Checking Mail or Manually Run.
___
NoOp wrote:
On 07/20/2011 10:15 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
...
See problem #672665 in Bugzilla.
Dick
Thanks. I added it to my watch list.
Problem #672665 has been marked Closed Duplicate because it duplicates
#512378. Apparently, some 2.x update of SM removed
Since I updated to 2.2 My filters are not always automatically sorting
incoming email. They sort some but not most of the messages. If I run
the filters manually they work as expected.
They are all set to Checking Mail or Manually Run.
___
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do) would
suffice.
Upgrading also gets the user off a
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Hmmm. I've already used this analogy once today (elsewhere).
Sometimes it only takes ONE individual to affect a change:
http://google.com/search?tbs=dfn:1q=hung-jury
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
OK, so if I dedicate my life to making sure
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally, including the Bing label,
in case that's any help.
TIA
--
War doesn't
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-07-19 9:57 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Agreed, it's valuable. But it's incomplete, just as your testing was
incomplete until someone using a different-language version tried it.
Good example.
Code used in Firefox and Thunderbird have quite a bit of automated
I am using 1.1.18 and I am having no problems.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally,
2.0.14 in Puppy Linux dpup 009 - it works fine.
I have these Plugins ...
File name: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
Shockwave Flash 10.2 d151
File name: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/gecko-mediaplayer-dvx.so
Gecko Media Player 0.9.9.2
Video Player Plug-in for
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally, including the Bing label,
in case that's any help.
On 7/20/2011 3:28 PM Paul B. Gallagher submitted the following:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally, including
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Shows fine for me. (SM2.2, MacOS X, usual plug-ins, nothing special).
Internet Exploiter 8
Philipp van Hüllen wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Shows fine for me. (SM2.2, MacOS X, usual plug-ins, nothing
On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally, including the Bing label,
While I very much prefer SeaMonkey over Firefox as a Web browser, I am
using Thunderbird as a newsreader. I do this because I surf the Web
through three different profiles, and I don't want to tie my newsgroup
surfing to any particular SeaMonkey profile. That is, if I switch
browser profiles, I
On 07/20/2011 11:23 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
I tracked it back to this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506985
[Bug 506985 - remove java-specific preferences from Firefox UI, hidden
prefs ]
Looks like the option to disable/enable java was removed in Firefox 3.6
On 7/20/11 4:54 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 07/20/2011 11:23 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
I tracked it back to this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506985
[Bug 506985 - remove java-specific preferences from Firefox UI, hidden
prefs ]
Looks like the option to disable/enable
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Inviting end users who are incapable of coding or testing
is an empty promise.
Describe more fully incapable of testing.
What I mean is that most end users can demo a program, play
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally,
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do) would
suffice.
Upgrading also gets
On 7/20/11 6:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8
On 11-07-20 9:41 PM, Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do)
On 20/07/2011 22:20, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Gabriel Cabillón wrote:
Make sure you have checked Change images on Preferences, Advanced,
Scripts Plugins.
Asked and answered upthread.
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Margo Guda wrote:
Do you use Noscript, or is there a way to disable javascript for
external links? I noticed the map would not display for me (with
Noscript enabled) until I granted permission for virtualearth.net.
Allowing scripts from that address caused the map to be displayed.
No, I don't
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do) would
suffice.
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 6:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally, including the Bing label, in case
that's any help.
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do) would
suffice.
Robert Gault wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally, including the Bing label, in
40 matches
Mail list logo