Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of
development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm
beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer
stick with SM.
Kind of sad
Hi,
WaltS48 a écrit le 06/07/2015 15:49 :
Try 2.39a1 at the bottom of this page. [Index of
/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk](http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/)
I didn't found Lightlink version for 2.39 :
On 8/07/2015 5:39 AM, John Duncan wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 6/07/2015 9:41 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 6/07/2015 5:36 PM, Yamo' wrote:
Yamo' a écrit le 06/07/2015 09:19 :
I didn't found any 2.35b1-candidates on :
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/
Or
On 8/07/2015 1:54 PM, »Q« wrote:
In news:2o-dnvmjkvvwdghinz2dnuu7-lwdn...@mozilla.org,
Paul Bergsagel pbergsa...@shaw.ca wrote:
Does SeaMonkey benefit, in the long run, with such a rapid
update schedule? If SeaMonkey adopted a less frequent update
schedule would the net benefits be greater
Edmund Wong wrote on 7/7/2015 8:32 PM:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of
development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm
beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer
stick with SM.
Kind of sad since
On 07/08/2015 09:01 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 8/07/2015 1:54 PM, »Q« wrote:
In news:2o-dnvmjkvvwdghinz2dnuu7-lwdn...@mozilla.org,
Paul Bergsagel pbergsa...@shaw.ca wrote:
Does SeaMonkey benefit, in the long run, with such a rapid
update schedule? If SeaMonkey adopted a less frequent update
On 8/07/2015 6:09 AM, John Duncan wrote:
EE wrote:
Daniel wrote:
and, Jonathan and others, just FYI, it's my belief that if the sniffers
sniffed for the term Gecko rather than the actual name then they would
accept Firefox, SeaMonkey and Opera (and probably others), at a minimum
Opera uses
On 8/07/2015 5:55 AM, John Duncan wrote:
Snip
To fix this,
couldn't we try always reporting the Firefox/x.x bit at the end of the
UA string to deal with invalid sniffing? or is that not the issue in
this
Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 7/8/2015 2:22 AM:
Hi Ed,
you find some thoughts here
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2015/07/08/how-dead-is-seamoneky/
Best regards
Rainer Bielefeld
Thanks, Rainer. Good to know.
--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Can you buy anything specific at a general
W dniu 07/07/2015 o 10:53 PM, EE pisze:
I decided to try SeaMonkey 2.36 on my Mac from Tinderbox builds on the
Moz FTP site, and it would not start. I compared the contents of the
app package of 2.36 with 2.35 and found that in the MacOS folder,
libmozalloc.dylib is missing in SM 2.36. When
Philip Chee wrote on 7/8/2015 2:35 AM:
On 07/07/2015 14:43, Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of
development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm
beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer
stick with SM.
Yamo' wrote:
Hi,
WaltS48 a écrit le 06/07/2015 15:49 :
Try 2.39a1 at the bottom of this page. [Index of
/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk](http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/)
I didn't found Lightlink version for
Daniel wrote:
On 8/07/2015 6:09 AM, John Duncan wrote:
EE wrote:
Daniel wrote:
and, Jonathan and others, just FYI, it's my belief that if the sniffers
sniffed for the term Gecko rather than the actual name then they
would
accept Firefox, SeaMonkey and Opera (and probably others), at a minimum
Daniel wrote:
On 8/07/2015 5:55 AM, John Duncan wrote:
Snip
To fix this,
couldn't we try always reporting the Firefox/x.x bit at the end of the
UA string to deal with invalid sniffing? or is that not the issue in
this circumstance?
Yes, you could, John, but then no-one will ever know about
Re: Create filter
F Murtz wrote:
How would you create a filter for a poster that continually changes
the email address like this poster,if you want to see examples look at
uk.legal
Col.edmund J.bourke hisburkens...@usa.com
The 2 address changes I made were within an hour I think, are
On 8/07/2015 1:54 PM, »Q« wrote:
In news:2o-dnvmjkvvwdghinz2dnuu7-lwdn...@mozilla.org,
Paul Bergsagel pbergsa...@shaw.ca wrote:
Does SeaMonkey benefit, in the long run, with such a rapid
update schedule? If SeaMonkey adopted a less frequent update
schedule would the net benefits be greater
Danny Kile wrote:
I would agree! Why does everyone think that a new version should come
out every month or two?
Overall, I'm quite content with less frequent updates.
However, knowing that Seamonkey follows development of Gecko, Firefox
and Thunderbird, and that those are on a 6-week
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 08/07/2015 01:08:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of
development of SM. Also,
haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that
I'm nearing the point
where I cannot any longer stick with
Adrian Kalla wrote:
W dniu 07/07/2015 o 10:53 PM, EE pisze:
I decided to try SeaMonkey 2.36 on my Mac from Tinderbox builds on the
Moz FTP site, and it would not start. I compared the contents of the
app package of 2.36 with 2.35 and found that in the MacOS folder,
libmozalloc.dylib is missing
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 08/07/2015 01:08:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of
development of SM. Also,
haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that
I'm nearing the point
where I cannot any longer stick with
Miles Fidelman wrote:
For what it's worth - I HATE rapid update cycles.
Well, I also hate that there are so many security issues causing rapid update
cycles. But at the end I appreciate if those security issues get fixed quickly.
Wherever I can, I run 2-4 years behind the current release
On 07/07/2015 14:43, Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of
development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm
beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer
stick with SM.
Kind of sad since I've been
Hi Ed,
you find some thoughts here
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2015/07/08/how-dead-is-seamoneky/
Best regards
Rainer Bielefeld
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
I just had a quick look at the URL you gave and it refers to an upcoming
Seamonkey version 2.35 that is based on Firefox 38. In yesterday's
emails also came the newsletter from US-CERT which states:
Original release date: July 07, 2015
Mozilla has released security updates to address
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 08/07/2015 01:08:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of
SM. Also,
haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing
the point
where I cannot any longer stick
S Slicer wrote on 7/8/2015 3:54 PM:
I stated with Netscape years and years ago, and when it ended switched
to SeaMonkey. I have tried other browsers and e-mail programs, but
SeaMonkey remains my all-time favorite.
A BIG thank you to all who currently and previously have worked on the
SeaMonkey
Edmund Wong wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of
development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm
beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer
stick with SM.
Kind of sad since I've been with it
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
How can I change my UA string
from: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0
SeaMonkey/2.32
to: Mozilla/9.0 (Windows NT 10.1; rv:99.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/99.0
?
You can either install an extension, there are several or in
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
How can I change my UA string
from: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0
SeaMonkey/2.32
to: Mozilla/9.0 (Windows NT 10.1; rv:99.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/99.0
?
You can either install an
S Slicer wrote:
I stated with Netscape years and years ago, and when it ended switched to
SeaMonkey. I have tried
other browsers and e-mail programs, but SeaMonkey remains my all-time favorite.
A BIG thank you to all who currently and previously have worked on the
SeaMonkey Project!
Hear
On 07/08/2015 08:27 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
S Slicer wrote on 7/8/2015 3:54 PM:
I stated with Netscape years and years ago, and when it ended switched
to SeaMonkey. I have tried other browsers and e-mail programs, but
SeaMonkey remains my all-time favorite.
A BIG thank you to all who currently
John Duncan wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I'm curious -- I was browsing around looking at keys containing the
string useragent and came to one named
general.useragent.site_specific_overrides
Does that mean there's a way to lie to specific dysfunctional sites
while retaining the normal
On 2015-07-08 1:34 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 8/07/2015 1:54 PM, »Q« wrote:
Since the last SeaMonkey release, there have been over 40 MFSAs, many
of them critical. IMO (and it's only that) if SM decided out of policy
*not* to issue security updates in a timely manner, that would mark
the
I stated with Netscape years and years ago, and when it ended switched
to SeaMonkey. I have tried other browsers and e-mail programs, but
SeaMonkey remains my all-time favorite.
A BIG thank you to all who currently and previously have worked on the
SeaMonkey Project!
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 08/07/2015 01:08:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of
development of SM. Also,
haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that
I'm nearing the point
where I cannot any longer stick with SM.
(snip)
Jonathan N. Little wrote on 08/07/2015 23:32:
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 08/07/2015 01:08:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of
development of SM. Also,
haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that
I'm nearing
Ray_Net wrote on 07/07/2015 09:55:
WaltS48 wrote on 06/07/2015 23:40:
On 07/06/2015 05:22 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
WaltS48 wrote on 06/07/2015 15:53:
On 07/06/2015 02:26 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
A site, telling me that my browser is not up-to-date direct me here:
http://browsehappy.com/?locale=fr
Where
37 matches
Mail list logo
