Tom Pamin wrote:
Bill Spikowski wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
EE wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
Bill Spikowski wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
EE wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
change in SM?
If
Ed Mullen wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote on 9/21/2015 7:05 PM:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
change in SM?
Just a thought:
On 24/09/2015 4:52 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Hey, Ray, how did your friend move/copy the profile to the new
computer?? I seem to recall if it was copied via a CD, the files in
the profile would be marked as Read-Only and SM *needs* to be able to
write to the files.
Well, of
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Jay O'Brien wrote:
>
>> I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife
>> and I each use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the
>> other three are used primarily to display our cameras, and they all
>> have web access.
>>
>> All five of
On 24/09/2015 00:58, WaltS48 wrote:
> Until 38.3.0 is released?
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox-esr/
38.3.0 was released a few days ago.
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/38.3.0/releasenotes/
(Therefore, SM 2.35 cannot be based on FF ESR 38.3)
Is SM
Daniel wrote:
Hey, Ray, how did your friend move/copy the profile to the new
computer?? I seem to recall if it was copied via a CD, the files in
the profile would be marked as Read-Only and SM *needs* to be able to
write to the files.
Well, of course, the files on the CD can't be updated, so
Robert Kaiser wrote on 23/09/2015 22:48:
Ray_Net schrieb:
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning
anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail "SeaMonkey/2.12.1" doesn't work under
Windows10 after the "big
Jay O'Brien wrote:
I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife and I each
use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the other three are used
primarily to display our cameras, and they all have web access.
All five of the computers exhibit the same problem.
Hi,
Mason83 a écrit le 24/09/2015 10:13 :
> Next SM is 2.38, right? What is that based on?
Gecko 41.
Best regards,
--
Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
http://pasdenom.info/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
EE wrote on 24/09/2015 00:36:
stango wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning
anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail "SeaMonkey/2.12.1" doesn't work under
Windows10 after the "big
Daniel wrote on 24/09/2015 07:08:
On 24/09/2015 1:53 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
stango wrote on 23/09/2015 17:39:
Ray_Net wrote:
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning
anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail
On 9/24/2015 12:37 AM, Edmund Wong wrote:
> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>> Jay O'Brien wrote:
>>
>>> I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife
>>> and I each use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the
>>> other three are used primarily to display our cameras, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
