Re: Address Book Contacts Disappeared

On 16/12/2016 22:31, Brian Mailman wrote: > Seamonkey 2.40 > Windows 10 > > Help, please. I just used the address book to send out an invitation > (if anyone doesn't recognize the word, it's where "invite" as a noun > came from) with a stack of bccs. > > Today I opened it and every contact

Re: huge lag in typing on Linked In Messages

Hawker wrote on 16-12-16 20:43: On 12/14/2016 3:43 PM, Ray_Net wrote: m...@hpathy.com wrote on 14-12-16 20:29: On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 11:15:36 AM UTC-4, Hawker wrote: Hello, When composing a message in Linkedin there is a huge lag between my typing and the characters showing up. It

Re: New 2.46 Windows release candidates

Just watch https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1294433 for its status updates. ;) On 12/16/2016 9:11 AM, TCW wrote: I pity the person who has to write notes encompassing changes from 2.41 to 2.46. ... -- "Do not kill ants. They are your best friends." --Joe Brainard Note: A fixed

Address Book Contacts Disappeared

Seamonkey 2.40 Windows 10 Help, please. I just used the address book to send out an invitation (if anyone doesn't recognize the word, it's where "invite" as a noun came from) with a stack of bccs. Today I opened it and every contact that I've collected over the past 20 years or so is gone.

Re: huge lag in typing on Linked In Messages

On 12/14/2016 3:43 PM, Ray_Net wrote: m...@hpathy.com wrote on 14-12-16 20:29: On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 11:15:36 AM UTC-4, Hawker wrote: Hello, When composing a message in Linkedin there is a huge lag between my typing and the characters showing up. It makes it very painful to compose

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

On 16/12/2016 10:02, Piscium wrote: > Question: "about:buildconfig" tells me that gcc v. 4.8.5 was used to > build SM. gcc 4.8.5 is (arguably) old as gcc 4.8.0, the first version > in that series, was released in March 22, 2013, 3.5 years ago. > > Considering that FF is developed at breakneck

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

bdelmee wrote: Edmund Wong wrote on 2016-12-15 08:36: bdelmee wrote: Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unoffical dev builds and encouraging us to try those and report any issue before 2.46 comes out. I am still using 2.38 as 2.40 had an annoying regression for me, which i'd like to check

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

bdelmee wrote: Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unoffical dev builds and encouraging us to try those and report any issue before 2.46 comes out. I am still using 2.38 as 2.40 had an annoying regression for me, which i'd like to check on the next beta and report if still present. But -

Re: New 2.46 Windows release candidates

Will likely be the final build. Just needs to be copied to the release directory and the release notes be written. FRG TCW wrote: On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:14:55 +0800, Edmund Wong wrote: Hi, Fwiw.. please *do* note that those 2.46 candidate builds are just test builds.

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

Yupidup, that worked. Thanks! Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 2016-12-16 11:26: Open Sidebar. Set search engine and do a search from there. Default will be set to this one then. Or do it from the search in the toolbar. The default engine always reflects the current engine now. FRG Daniel wrote:

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

Open Sidebar. Set search engine and do a search from there. Default will be set to this one then. Or do it from the search in the toolbar. The default engine always reflects the current engine now. FRG Daniel wrote: On 16/12/2016 8:57 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: een duck-ducked! Did I

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

On 16/12/2016 8:57 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Setting the default search engine no longer works. Has been removed from Gecko/Firefox. Tracked in Bug 1265881: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265881 Check it for a workaround. FRG bdelmee wrote: bdelmee wrote on 2016-12-16

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

Setting the default search engine no longer works. Has been removed from Gecko/Firefox. Tracked in Bug 1265881: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265881 Check it for a workaround. FRG bdelmee wrote: bdelmee wrote on 2016-12-16 09:31: B. odd - even though my profile has

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

bdelmee wrote on 2016-12-16 09:31: Edmund Wong wrote on 2016-12-16 04:40: Daniel wrote: On 15/12/2016 6:40 PM, bdelmee wrote: Richmond wrote on 2016-12-14 22:51: bdelmee writes: Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unofficial dev builds and encouraging us to try

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

On 16 December 2016 at 03:40, Edmund Wong wrote: > It should be (officially just as a candidate, but unofficially as a > release) > https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/candidates/2.46-candidates/build9/unsigned/ > > basically.. candidate = unofficial >

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

Edmund Wong wrote on 2016-12-16 04:40: Daniel wrote: On 15/12/2016 6:40 PM, bdelmee wrote: Richmond wrote on 2016-12-14 22:51: bdelmee writes: Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unofficial dev builds and encouraging us to try those and report any issue before 2.46

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

Edmund Wong wrote on 2016-12-15 08:36: bdelmee wrote: Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unoffical dev builds and encouraging us to try those and report any issue before 2.46 comes out. I am still using 2.38 as 2.40 had an annoying regression for me, which i'd like to check on the next