On 3/5/17, Felix Miata wrote:
> Lee composed on 2017-03-05 22:49 (UTC-0500):
>
>> save the page, edit the .html file removing any references to
>> media="print" stylesheets, load the saved page, print
>
> That may not be sufficient. Individual sheets may be limited to screen
> media, in
> which ca
Lee composed on 2017-03-05 22:49 (UTC-0500):
save the page, edit the .html file removing any references to
media="print" stylesheets, load the saved page, print
That may not be sufficient. Individual sheets may be limited to screen media, in
which case such limitation may need to be removed t
On 3/5/17, Alexander Yudenitsch wrote:
> Paul B. Gallagher wrote, on 05 Mar 17 03:02:
>
>> Many website nowadays have their own "Print" buttons that deliver what
>> the designers consider "printer-friendly" versions of their pages. But
>> even if I ignore those and use SeaMonkey's own "Print" func
On 03/05/2017 08:32 PM, JAS wrote:
JAS wrote:
njoracle wrote:
Anyone else having a problem with the connection to
news.eternal-september.org
timing out? Started about 20 minutes ago.
Yes, it has done that to me for some time now and also aioe --I'm using
SM 2.47 and Win 7 Pro. I can read a fe
JAS wrote:
njoracle wrote:
Anyone else having a problem with the connection to
news.eternal-september.org
timing out? Started about 20 minutes ago.
Yes, it has done that to me for some time now and also aioe --I'm using
SM 2.47 and Win 7 Pro. I can read a few posts and then it times out.
JAS
njoracle wrote:
Anyone else having a problem with the connection to news.eternal-september.org
timing out? Started about 20 minutes ago.
Yes, it has done that to me for some time now and also aioe --I'm using
SM 2.47 and Win 7 Pro. I can read a few posts and then it times out.
JAS
njoracle wrote:
> Richard Alan wrote:
>> njoracle wrote:
>>> Richard Alan wrote:
njoracle wrote:
> Anyone else having a problem with the connection to
> news.eternal-september.org timing out? Started about 20 minutes ago.
Yes, it appears to be down at this time. So is t
Richard Alan wrote:
> njoracle wrote:
>
>> Richard Alan wrote:
>>> njoracle wrote:
>>>
Anyone else having a problem with the connection to
news.eternal-september.org timing out? Started about 20 minutes ago.
>>>
>>> Yes, it appears to be down at this time. So is the web site:
>>>
>>>
Hi, Frank-Rainer Grahl! Thanks for the quick reply:
Meaning that you couldn't do that in 2.40?
Meaning I didn't even try.
So, maybe it has absolutely nothing to do with the SM version, but it's
something in your system that is different from mine (eg, I'm using XP
on this machine; I'll try
> Meaning that you couldn't do that in 2.40?
Meaning I didn't even try.
> From what I've seen in this and other forums, I think I'll stay on 2.40
> until I have very strong reasons to do otherwise...
2.46 is not error free but miles ahead of 2.40. Backup you profile and just
try it. Its free
Op 5-3-2017 om 19:18 schreef njoracle:
Richard Alan wrote:
njoracle wrote:
Anyone else having a problem with the connection to
news.eternal-september.org timing out? Started about 20 minutes
ago.
Yes, it appears to be down at this time. So is the web site:
"- Unable to connect to database s
njoracle wrote:
> Richard Alan wrote:
>> njoracle wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone else having a problem with the connection to
>>> news.eternal-september.org timing out? Started about 20 minutes ago.
>>
>> Yes, it appears to be down at this time. So is the web site:
>>
>>"- Unable to connect to databa
Hi, Frank-Rainer Grahl! Thanks for wroting, on 05 Mar 17 14:09:
I can access the login page out of the box in 2.51.
Meaning that you couldn't do that in 2.40?
What changes after 2.40 would lead to that?
If you still use 2.40 please upgrade to 2.46.
From what I've seen in this and other fo
Richard Alan wrote:
> njoracle wrote:
>
>> Anyone else having a problem with the connection to
>> news.eternal-september.org timing out? Started about 20 minutes ago.
>
> Yes, it appears to be down at this time. So is the web site:
>
>"- Unable to connect to database server"
>
> Have anothe
njoracle wrote:
> Anyone else having a problem with the connection to
> news.eternal-september.org timing out? Started about 20 minutes ago.
Yes, it appears to be down at this time. So is the web site:
"- Unable to connect to database server"
Have another coffee and it'll probably be back up
Anyone else having a problem with the connection to news.eternal-september.org
timing out? Started about 20 minutes ago.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
David H. Durgee wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Many website nowadays have their own "Print" buttons that deliver
what the designers consider "printer-friendly" versions of their
pages. But even if I ignore those and use SeaMonkey's own "Print"
function, many sites outsmart me by serving their
"
David E. Ross wrote:
> On 3/4/2017 10:02 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>> Many website nowadays have their own "Print" buttons that deliver what
>> the designers consider "printer-friendly" versions of their pages. But
>> even if I ignore those and use SeaMonkey's own "Print" function, many
>> si
I can access the login page out of the box in 2.51. If you still use 2.40
please upgrade to 2.46. If you have custom cookie settings make sure that at
least session cookies get enabled.
FRG
Alexander Yudenitsch wrote:
I use the Fastmail service for e-mail, and have been a user for many yeras
I use the Fastmail service for e-mail, and have been a user for many
yeras (currently a sort of 'legacy user', since they've changed owners
and systems several times over the years).
FastMail has been on a new site for several years, but have kept a
'classic version' for legacy users; however,
On 3/4/2017 10:02 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Many website nowadays have their own "Print" buttons that deliver what
> the designers consider "printer-friendly" versions of their pages. But
> even if I ignore those and use SeaMonkey's own "Print" function, many
> sites outsmart me by serving
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, on 05 Mar 17 03:02:
Many website nowadays have their own "Print" buttons that deliver what
the designers consider "printer-friendly" versions of their pages. But
even if I ignore those and use SeaMonkey's own "Print" function, many
sites outsmart me by serving their "pri
On 2017-03-05 01:02, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Many website nowadays have their own "Print" buttons that deliver what
the designers consider "printer-friendly" versions of their pages. But
even if I ignore those and use SeaMonkey's own "Print" function, many
sites outsmart me by serving their "pri
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Many website nowadays have their own "Print" buttons that deliver what
the designers consider "printer-friendly" versions of their pages. But
even if I ignore those and use SeaMonkey's own "Print" function, many
sites outsmart me by serving their "printer-friendly" versio
24 matches
Mail list logo
