Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 01:03:20 +0200, /Dirk Munk/:
The problem is most likely that this site has an IPv6 address, but
the site itself is not prepared for IPv6.
See my other reply to this thread. The problem appears with the
Lightning string included in the UA header.
TCW wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:32:05 -0700, Pat Connors
wrote:
Leaky as in memory leakage. 2.48 and 2.49 were leaky for me.
During the course of the day memory usage would just go up and up
and never be freed up until I was consuming 1-2GB RAM. 2.50beta
was fine the
Ray_Net wrote:
When surfing with my SM browser I had clicked on a link . AND the
result is that SM had created a new newsgroup account in the mail/news
part of SM.
I did not want to play with this group - and selecting it then pushing
on the delete key did not delete this "%£*@#" account
On 4/26/17 11:38 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
I'm curious.
How does clicking a link in the browser create a new newsgroup
account?
What newsgroup?
It added the server name, port, security settings, username and
password?
Did you mean Blogs and News Feed account?
Usetabe (I
Leaky as in memory leakage. 2.48 and 2.49 were leaky for me. During
the course of the day memory usage would just go up and up and never
be freed up until I was consuming 1-2GB RAM. 2.50beta was fine the
2.50 release brought back the leakiness. I just switched to the 2.51
beta this morning
WaltS48 wrote on 26-04-17 17:35:
On 4/26/17 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 26/04/2017 11:06 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Richmond wrote on 26-04-17 09:45:
Ray_Net wrote:
When surfing with my SM browser I had clicked on a link . AND the
result is that SM had created a new newsgroup account in the
On 4/26/17 1:32 PM, Pat Connors wrote:
I have found this final version of Adrian's 2.50 leaky as the previous
versions were. The 2.50 beta from March seemed better. I was able to
crash 2.50 after it had consumed 1+GB of RAM and then measuring memory
but even with 2.50 beta, I was always
I have found this final version of Adrian's 2.50 leaky as the previous
versions were. The 2.50 beta from March seemed better. I was able to
crash 2.50 after it had consumed 1+GB of RAM and then measuring memory
but even with 2.50 beta, I was always stable.
What does 'leaky' mean?
I have
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 01:03:20 +0200, /Dirk Munk/:
The problem is most likely that this site has an IPv6 address, but the
site itself is not prepared for IPv6.
See my other reply to this thread. The problem appears with the
Lightning string included in the UA header. I had experienced the same
WaltS48 wrote:
I'm curious.
How does clicking a link in the browser create a new newsgroup
account?
What newsgroup?
It added the server name, port, security settings, username and
password?
Did you mean Blogs and News Feed account?
Usetabe (I haven't tried it lately) that clicking a link
On 4/26/17 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 26/04/2017 11:06 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Richmond wrote on 26-04-17 09:45:
Ray_Net wrote:
When surfing with my SM browser I had clicked on a link . AND the
result is that SM had created a new newsgroup account in the mail/news
part of SM.
I did not want
On 26/04/2017 11:06 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Richmond wrote on 26-04-17 09:45:
Ray_Net wrote:
When surfing with my SM browser I had clicked on a link . AND the
result is that SM had created a new newsgroup account in the mail/news
part of SM.
I did not want to play with this group - and
On 4/26/17 2:01 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
When surfing with my SM browser I had clicked on a link . AND the
result is that SM had created a new newsgroup account in the mail/news
part of SM.
I did not want to play with this group - and selecting it then pushing
on the delete key did not delete
Richmond wrote on 26-04-17 09:45:
Ray_Net wrote:
When surfing with my SM browser I had clicked on a link . AND the
result is that SM had created a new newsgroup account in the mail/news
part of SM.
I did not want to play with this group - and selecting it then pushing
on the delete key did
On 4/24/17 4:24 PM, S Slicer wrote:
TCW wrote:
Just saw it here
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/
The last 64- bit version that worked for me was 2.45!
I even uninstalled all add-ons, and v2.50, like the others after
On 26/04/2017 5:45 PM, Richmond wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
When surfing with my SM browser I had clicked on a link . AND the
result is that SM had created a new newsgroup account in the mail/news
part of SM.
I did not want to play with this group - and selecting it then pushing
on the delete
On 26/04/2017 4:42 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Ant wrote:
Awesome! Thanks. Is there a way to search ALL addressbooks at once
instead going one by one? :(
Doesn't seem to be. There's no parent for the address books (as for
example the account name is the parent of each mail folder), so you
On 4/25/2017 11:42 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Ant wrote:
Awesome! Thanks. Is there a way to search ALL addressbooks at once
instead going one by one? :(
Doesn't seem to be. There's no parent for the address books (as for
example the account name is the parent of each mail folder), so you
On 4/25/2017 11:44 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Ant wrote:
Also, no search in Notes field?
Apparently not. You can't select it from the pull-down list in the
search dialog, and you can't add it as a column in the address book itself.
Darn and thanks. :(
--
"What is it all but a trouble of
Ray_Net wrote:
> When surfing with my SM browser I had clicked on a link . AND the
> result is that SM had created a new newsgroup account in the mail/news
> part of SM.
>
> I did not want to play with this group - and selecting it then pushing
> on the delete key did not delete this
Ant wrote:
Awesome! Thanks. Is there a way to search ALL addressbooks at once
instead going one by one? :(
Doesn't seem to be. There's no parent for the address books (as for
example the account name is the parent of each mail folder), so you have
to choose one.
--
War doesn't determine
Ant wrote:
Also, no search in Notes field?
Apparently not. You can't select it from the pull-down list in the
search dialog, and you can't add it as a column in the address book itself.
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
When surfing with my SM browser I had clicked on a link . AND the
result is that SM had created a new newsgroup account in the mail/news
part of SM.
I did not want to play with this group - and selecting it then pushing
on the delete key did not delete this "%£*@#" account .GR
23 matches
Mail list logo