Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-23 Thread Sailfish
My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/22/2012 11:23 PM: On 1/22/12 7:45 PM, Sailfish wrote [in part]: You should bring this up to the owner's attention. I would indeed notify the extension's developer. However: * The AMO site provides no contact info. *

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-23 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/23/12 12:07 AM, Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/22/2012 11:23 PM: On 1/22/12 7:45 PM, Sailfish wrote [in part]: You should bring this up to the owner's attention. I would indeed notify the extension's developer. However: *

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-23 Thread Sailfish
My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/23/2012 10:08 AM: On 1/23/12 12:07 AM, Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/22/2012 11:23 PM: On 1/22/12 7:45 PM, Sailfish wrote [in part]: You should bring this up to the

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-23 Thread Jens Hatlak
NoOp wrote: Jens, any possiblity that the compatibility reporter can include a box/tick that the extension works if the install.rdf is modified? Hardly. First of all, the ACR is a Mozilla product, i.e. its main focus is Firefox and possibly Thunderbird. Secondly, it's not the right approach.

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-23 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/23/12 10:23 AM, Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/23/2012 10:08 AM: On 1/23/12 12:07 AM, Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/22/2012 11:23 PM: On 1/22/12 7:45 PM, Sailfish wrote [in

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-23 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/23/12 4:56 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/23/12 10:23 AM, Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/23/2012 10:08 AM: On 1/23/12 12:07 AM, Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/22/2012 11:23

[Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread NoOp
On 01/22/2012 12:57 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: David E. Ross wrote: When I try to install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1, I get the following error: BetterPrivacy could not be installed because it is not compatible with SeaMonkey 2.6.1. I get this even when I attempt to install directly

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/22/12 4:52 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/22/2012 12:57 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: David E. Ross wrote: When I try to install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1, I get the following error: BetterPrivacy could not be installed because it is not compatible with SeaMonkey 2.6.1. I get this even

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread NoOp
On 01/22/2012 05:23 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/22/12 4:52 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Jens, any possiblity that the compatibility reporter can include a box/tick that the extension works if the install.rdf is modified? For example: with SM 2.7b4 (linux) the following are fine with a modified

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread NoOp
On 01/22/2012 05:53 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/22/2012 05:23 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/22/12 4:52 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Jens, any possiblity that the compatibility reporter can include a box/tick that the extension works if the install.rdf is modified? For example: with SM 2.7b4 (linux) the

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread Sailfish
My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/22/2012 5:23 PM: On 1/22/12 4:52 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/22/2012 12:57 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: David E. Ross wrote: When I try to install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1, I get the following error: BetterPrivacy could

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/22/12 6:08 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/22/2012 05:53 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/22/2012 05:23 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/22/12 4:52 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Jens, any possiblity that the compatibility reporter can include a box/tick that the extension works if the install.rdf is modified? For

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/22/12 7:07 PM, Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/22/2012 5:23 PM: On 1/22/12 4:52 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/22/2012 12:57 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: David E. Ross wrote: When I try to install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1, I get the

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread Sailfish
My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/22/2012 7:17 PM: [snip /] I tried editing install.rdf to look that way. It did not help. And yes, I know I edited correctly. I've successfully edited install.rdf files in quite a few other extensions. At minimum, it's

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:07:39 -0800, Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on 1/22/2012 5:23 PM: On 1/22/12 4:52 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/22/2012 12:57 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: David E. Ross wrote: When I try to install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread Sailfish
My bloviated meandering follows what Philip Chee graced us with on 1/22/2012 8:11 PM: [snip /] There is no such thing as old/new RDF format. These two are identical as far as RDF is concerned. RDF is a directed graph. The problem is that there are an infinite number of ways a RDF graph can be

Re: [Add-on Compatibility] was - Re: Cannot Install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1

2012-01-22 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/22/12 7:45 PM, Sailfish wrote [in part]: You should bring this up to the owner's attention. I would indeed notify the extension's developer. However: * The AMO site provides no contact info. * The developer's site http://nc.ddns.us/extensions.html is very confusing about