Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/21/2009 04:59 PM, Bush wrote: ... > > Had to go back port 110 None SSL > > Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong > with the Built-in Firewall > > All settings are correct . This might be of interest & suggests that the problem may have been (what else?) t

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE

2009-11-21 Thread Bush
Paul wrote: Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any s

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE

2009-11-21 Thread Paul
Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me