Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-28 Thread Robert Kaiser
Daniel schrieb: Robert, if I wanted to get bitchy I'd type something like Well!! If that's the case, why do you have those options available?? If it was up to me, we probably wouldn't have them in a graphical UI. Your response has prompted me to re-read and think about the selections on that

Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-28 Thread David E. Ross
On 6/27/10 4:31 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: Daniel schrieb: Seems something is wrong here! Yes, not letting it check daily and automatically apply security updates is wrong, as it compromises your security. Robert Kaiser Some software (Windows XP included) offer the option to check for

Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-28 Thread NoOp
On 06/28/2010 09:58 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 6/27/10 4:31 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: Daniel schrieb: Seems something is wrong here! Yes, not letting it check daily and automatically apply security updates is wrong, as it compromises your security. Robert Kaiser Some software

Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-27 Thread Daniel
Robert Kaiser wrote: Pat Connors schrieb: When I read the list, it was mentioned that this not the full 2.0.5 but a security update. The full 2.0.5 is a security update to 2.0.4, so I don't understand what you mean... Robert Kaiser Robert, could you please respond to my reply to Pat in

Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-27 Thread Robert Kaiser
Daniel schrieb: Seems something is wrong here! Yes, not letting it check daily and automatically apply security updates is wrong, as it compromises your security. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often

Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-27 Thread Robert Kaiser
Daniel schrieb: Robert, could you please respond to my reply to Pat in this thread?? I don't have anything good to say, but as you insisted, I told you my opinion there. I usually only reply if I have anything good to say, but if I also should if I don't I will take the tiome, slow down

Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-27 Thread Bernard Mercier
Pat Connors avait écrit le 25/06/2010 : I was surprised this morning when I clicked on SM and found I had an automatic download from SeaMonkey that I didn't ask for. When the browser finally load, it said I now had 2.0.5. I have been on SM since Netscape stopped updating and this has

Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-26 Thread Daniel
Pat Connors wrote: I was surprised this morning when I clicked on SM and found I had an automatic download from SeaMonkey that I didn't ask for. When the browser finally load, it said I now had 2.0.5. I have been on SM since Netscape stopped updating and this has never happened before. When I

Re: Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-26 Thread Robert Kaiser
Pat Connors schrieb: When I read the list, it was mentioned that this not the full 2.0.5 but a security update. The full 2.0.5 is a security update to 2.0.4, so I don't understand what you mean... Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never

Automatic 2.0.5 version

2010-06-25 Thread Pat Connors
I was surprised this morning when I clicked on SM and found I had an automatic download from SeaMonkey that I didn't ask for. When the browser finally load, it said I now had 2.0.5. I have been on SM since Netscape stopped updating and this has never happened before. When I read the list,