On 7/4/15, WaltS48 thalion...@evomeraim.com wrote:
On 07/04/2015 09:48 AM, Lee wrote:
On 7/3/15, WaltS48 thalion...@evomeraim.com wrote:
On 07/03/2015 02:32 PM, warwolfpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is
available as a stand alone piece
On 2015-07-03 4:47 PM, stango wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
warwolfprime wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is
available as a stand alone piece of software,
The Composer is seriously out-of-date, and hasn't been touched in well
over a decade. No,
Lee wrote:
On 7/3/15, WaltS48thalion...@evomeraim.com wrote:
On 07/03/2015 02:32 PM, warwolfpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is
available as a stand alone piece of software, or if SeaMonkey itself is
required. I am jumping to Windows 7
On 07/04/2015 10:57 AM, Lee wrote:
On 7/4/15, WaltS48 thalion...@evomeraim.com wrote:
On 07/04/2015 09:48 AM, Lee wrote:
On 7/3/15, WaltS48 thalion...@evomeraim.com wrote:
On 07/03/2015 02:32 PM, warwolfpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey
I am jumping to Windows 7 from a Windows XP machine (which
amazingly enough, still has classic Netscape Composer), and I nominally use
firefox as my primary browser. Can I get the Composer on its own, or what?
Install SeaMonkey and use it just for editing html, not surfing.
And other
On 7/3/15, WaltS48 thalion...@evomeraim.com wrote:
On 07/03/2015 02:32 PM, warwolfpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is
available as a stand alone piece of software, or if SeaMonkey itself is
required. I am jumping to Windows 7 from a
On 07/04/2015 09:48 AM, Lee wrote:
On 7/3/15, WaltS48 thalion...@evomeraim.com wrote:
On 07/03/2015 02:32 PM, warwolfpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is
available as a stand alone piece of software, or if SeaMonkey itself is
required. I am
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is available
as a stand alone piece of software, or if SeaMonkey itself is required. I am
jumping to Windows 7 from a Windows XP machine (which amazingly enough, still
has classic Netscape Composer), and I nominally use firefox as
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
you can put that definition in the style sheet and just code font
style=whatever.../style.
Just one minor correction to your otherwise excellent post. The above
would be:
p class=whatever.../p
Class, instead of style, and apply it to the HTML elements instead of
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
you can put that definition in the style sheet and just code font
style=whatever.../style.
Just one minor correction to your otherwise excellent post. The above
would be:
p class=whatever.../p
Whoops, absolutely right. I
stango wrote:
stango wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
stango wrote:
You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using
Blue Griffon.
Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'!
Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site, but authors wishing to use
new
stango wrote:
If you looked at my web site first glance you would not be able to tell
what I used to create it and most people will not care. Because I know
how to write code I decided that I do not need CSS to create it.
Feasible, yes. Efficient, not always.
The original genius of HTML was
stango wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
That's irrelevant to this discussion so far. Bluefish isn't related to
Composer or BlueGriffon at all. It is an entirely different kind of
tool. (I know; I use Bluefish.)
If you looked at my web site first glance you would not be able to tell
On 07/03/2015 02:32 PM, warwolfpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is available
as a stand alone piece of software, or if SeaMonkey itself is required. I am
jumping to Windows 7 from a Windows XP machine (which amazingly enough, still
has
stango wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
stango wrote:
You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using Blue
Griffon.
Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'!
Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site, but authors wishing to use
new
technologies
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
stango wrote:
stango wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
stango wrote:
You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using
Blue Griffon.
Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'!
Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site,
warwolfprime wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is
available as a stand alone piece of software,
The Composer is seriously out-of-date, and hasn't been touched in well
over a decade. No, it's not available separately. You would do better to
get and
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
warwolfprime wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is
available as a stand alone piece of software,
The Composer is seriously out-of-date, and hasn't been touched in well
over a decade. No, it's not available separately. You
On 7/3/15, warwolfpr...@gmail.com warwolfpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is
available as a stand alone piece of software,
nope
or if SeaMonkey itself is required.
yup
I am jumping to Windows 7 from a Windows XP machine (which
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
stango wrote:
You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using Blue
Griffon.
Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'!
Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site, but authors wishing to use new
technologies such as html5 and
stango wrote:
You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using Blue
Griffon.
Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'!
Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site, but authors wishing to use new
technologies such as html5 and CSS will be better served with
21 matches
Mail list logo
