Il 07/01/10 02:56, Rufus ha scritto:
Andrea Govoni wrote:
Nevertheless, I have a problem with the text in the upper section of the
page [1], where some symbols used for unrecognized characters are
displayed (see [2]). However, I don't get those strange unrecognized
character symbols on SM
In news:0oydnd7rqj4mgtvwnz2dnuvz_oadn...@mozilla.org,
NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid wrote:
On 01/06/2010 03:08 PM, Andrea Govoni wrote:
Nevertheless, I have a problem with the text in the upper section
of the page [1], where some symbols used for unrecognized
characters are displayed
On 01/05/2010 04:03 AM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
Just to be sure I was getting the fonts right, I opened a doc in
OpenOffice.org and used the fonts inserted the 'b' and it also shows
as in your google-chrome.png. If you'd like, I can send you a screenshot
from SeaMonkey
Il 06/01/10 20:27, NoOp ha scritto:
As an update; Christian created a bug report for this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538007
[Truetype fonts referenced in the above mentioned web page are not
displayed]
We've tested confirmed in linux I also tested in Windows. Could
Andrea Govoni wrote:
Il 06/01/10 20:27, NoOp ha scritto:
As an update; Christian created a bug report for this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538007
[Truetype fonts referenced in the above mentioned web page are not
displayed]
We've tested confirmed in linux I also tested in
NoOp wrote:
On 01/04/2010 12:24 PM, NoOp wrote:
SeaMonkey 1.1.18 picks up the font as shown in your google-chrome.png.
Firefox 3.5.6 does not. I'll need to close SeaMonkey 2.0.1 to test
also will test in 2.0.2pre.
Nope. SM 2.0.1 and 2.0.2pre (linux) do not display the font(s). Again,
1.1.18
On 01/05/2010 04:03 AM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
so, it's nothing to do with Ubuntu fonts as 1.1.18 does pick up the font.
Just to be sure I was getting the fonts right, I opened a doc in
OpenOffice.org and used the fonts inserted the 'b' and it also shows
as in your
NoOp wrote:
On 01/03/2010 07:07 AM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
Since SM 2 I've been unable to use a web site,
http://www.jyskordbog.dk/ordbog/, properly. The site offers an on-line
doctionary on Danish dialects. In order to display phonetic characters
it references a set of fonts which can be
On 01/04/2010 12:56 AM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
The difference is which glyphs you're seeing. I've uploaded 2 screen
shots of http://www.jyskordbog.dk/ordbog/
Google Chrome:
http://www.icking-music-archive.org/cmo/musik/outgoing/Screenshot-Jysk-Ordbog-Google-Chrome.png
SM 2.0.1:
On 01/04/2010 12:24 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 01/04/2010 12:56 AM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
The difference is which glyphs you're seeing. I've uploaded 2 screen
shots of http://www.jyskordbog.dk/ordbog/
Google Chrome:
Since SM 2 I've been unable to use a web site,
http://www.jyskordbog.dk/ordbog/, properly. The site offers an on-line
doctionary on Danish dialects. In order to display phonetic characters
it references a set of fonts which can be downloaded from the site
Christian Mondrup wrote:
[...]
(http://www.jyskordbog.dk/hjemmesider/jyskiso.exe).
This file is in fact a zip file containing 3 truetype fonts.
I've stored these fonts in the
~/.fonts and /user/share/fonts/truetype directories
of my Ubuntu 9.10 workstation
When I point the Konqueror browser to
JeffM wrote:
Christian Mondrup wrote:
[...]
(http://www.jyskordbog.dk/hjemmesider/jyskiso.exe).
This file is in fact a zip file containing 3 truetype fonts.
I've stored these fonts in the
~/.fonts and /user/share/fonts/truetype directories
of my Ubuntu 9.10 workstation
When I point the
On 01/03/2010 07:07 AM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
Since SM 2 I've been unable to use a web site,
http://www.jyskordbog.dk/ordbog/, properly. The site offers an on-line
doctionary on Danish dialects. In order to display phonetic characters
it references a set of fonts which can be downloaded
14 matches
Mail list logo
