Trane Francks wrote:
On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:
EE wrote:
regz91 wrote:
I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther
the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.
64-bit builds are also for Mac
Trane Francks wrote:
On 12/23/13 11:40 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:
EE wrote:
regz91 wrote:
I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The
windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser
regz91 wrote:
I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.
64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
EE wrote:
regz91 wrote:
I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.
64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.
Only if you have Lion (OSX.7.x), Mountain Lion (OSX.8.x), or
On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:
EE wrote:
regz91 wrote:
I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.
64-bit builds are also for Mac OS.
Only if you have
Trane Francks wrote:
On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:
EE wrote:
regz91 wrote:
I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther
the
OS is 32 or 64 bit.
64-bit builds are also for Mac
On 12/23/13 11:40 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
On 12/23/13 10:50 AM +0900, PhillipJones wrote:
EE wrote:
regz91 wrote:
I think we have 64 bit builds of SeaMonkey only for Linux. The windows
version of SeaMonkey is always a 32 bit browser regardless of whther
the
OS is
Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.
So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla
page to click update now again and that one results in a page
that appears to
On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.
So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla
page to click update now again and
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.
So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla
page to click update now
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.
So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla
page to click update now
On 12/20/2013 4:47 PM, chicagofan wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.
So I click on the SM update now button which takes
Larry S. wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/20/2013 1:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Using SM 2.17.1 trying to run some speed tests on my cable service, and
I find that Adobe Flashand Java are disabled and nothing will run.
So I click on the SM update now button which takes me to a Mozilla
page to
13 matches
Mail list logo