Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-12 Thread NFN Smith
EE wrote: Can the old Adblock Plus still use the subscriptions?  If it still works, keep using it, unless you want to switch to uBlock Origin, which can block more things.  There is still a legacy version of that which works with SeaMonkey and Pale Moon as well. Yes, it can. As far as I'm

Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread EE
Daniel wrote: Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM: Example: Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF. Would SM be modified in such a way that an addon for the new FF

Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread GerardJan
Daniel wrote: Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM: Example: Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM talking about confusion, this is *infusion* ! -- https://facebook.com/gerardjan.vinkesteijn Karl's version of

Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread GerardJan
Ray_Net wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 11-09-18 15:33: Webextension support is planned for 2.57. Thanks for giving me a hope to stay with SM. there is always hope sincerely, -- https://facebook.com/gerardjan.vinkesteijn Karl's version of Parkinson's Law: Work expands to exceed the

Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread Ray_Net
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 11-09-18 15:33: Webextension support is planned for 2.57. Thanks for giving me a hope to stay with SM. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread David E. Ross
On 9/11/2018 5:37 AM, Ray_Net wrote: > Daniel wrote on 11-09-18 10:56: >> Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM: >>> Example: >>> >>> Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM >>> but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM >>> >>> Because the addon-interface is different

Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread WaltS48
On 9/11/18 8:37 AM, Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote on 11-09-18 10:56: Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM: Example: Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF. Would SM

Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Webextension support is planned for 2.57. > Then, the best thing to do would be abandoning SM by using from now FF and TB exclusively ? The first one becomes a permanent construction site with a more primitive ui in each version and functionality loss and the second one struggles too but is

Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread Ray_Net
Daniel wrote on 11-09-18 10:56: Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM: Example: Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF. Would SM be modified in such a way that an

Re: What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread Daniel
Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM: Example: Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF. Would SM be modified in such a way that an addon for the new FF can be

What about new extensions(add-on) ?

2018-09-11 Thread Ray_Net
Example: Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF. Would SM be modified in such a way that an addon for the new FF can be loaded/used by SM ? Or SM will stay with