EE wrote:
Can the old Adblock Plus still use the subscriptions? If it still
works, keep using it, unless you want to switch to uBlock Origin, which
can block more things. There is still a legacy version of that which
works with SeaMonkey and Pale Moon as well.
Yes, it can.
As far as I'm
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM:
Example:
Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM
but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM
Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF.
Would SM be modified in such a way that an addon for the new FF
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM:
Example:
Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM
but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM
talking about confusion, this is *infusion* !
--
https://facebook.com/gerardjan.vinkesteijn
Karl's version of
Ray_Net wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 11-09-18 15:33:
Webextension support is planned for 2.57.
Thanks for giving me a hope to stay with SM.
there is always hope
sincerely,
--
https://facebook.com/gerardjan.vinkesteijn
Karl's version of Parkinson's Law: Work expands to exceed the
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 11-09-18 15:33:
Webextension support is planned for 2.57.
Thanks for giving me a hope to stay with SM.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 9/11/2018 5:37 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
> Daniel wrote on 11-09-18 10:56:
>> Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM:
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM
>>> but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM
>>>
>>> Because the addon-interface is different
On 9/11/18 8:37 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote on 11-09-18 10:56:
Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM:
Example:
Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM
but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM
Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF.
Would SM
Webextension support is planned for 2.57.
> Then, the best thing to do would be abandoning SM by using from now FF and
TB exclusively ?
The first one becomes a permanent construction site with a more primitive ui
in each version and functionality loss and the second one struggles too but is
Daniel wrote on 11-09-18 10:56:
Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM:
Example:
Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM
but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM
Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF.
Would SM be modified in such a way that an
Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM:
Example:
Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM
but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM
Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF.
Would SM be modified in such a way that an addon for the new FF can be
Example:
Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM
but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM
Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF.
Would SM be modified in such a way that an addon for the new FF can be
loaded/used by SM ?
Or SM will stay with
11 matches
Mail list logo