Re: less secure apps

Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:59:51 +0800, /Philip Chee/: Intresting tidbit: During development, Several Thunderbird developers wanted to their Oauth2 option to be labelled "less secure Google authentication". Now that my company has enforced usage of 2-factor authentication for the Google services

Re: less secure apps

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:52:08 -0400, /Jonathan N. Little/: I can see it as available option on all my IMAP accounts, but Christian Riechers pointed in another reply: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:34:16 +0200, /Christian Riechers/: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:54:11 +0200, /Christian

Re: less secure apps

Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:52:08 -0400, /Jonathan N. Little/: Philip Chee wrote: Intresting tidbit: During development, Several Thunderbird developers wanted to their Oauth2 option to be labelled "less secure Google authentication". :-) Good one! But Oauth2 option is still not available in

Re: less secure apps

Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:59:51 +0800, /Philip Chee/: The Oauth2 code is 100% shared with Thunderbird. It's also 100% written by the Thunderbird developers, so everything should work identically. It might be down to the settings made by the admin of your company Google account. Yes, turned out to

Re: less secure apps

ow) to log in. Then I've been able to use my account from SeaMonkey just like before, even when I've set my Google account to not allow "less secure apps". This appears o.k. but then I've found I'm not able to do the same with my company account, which is also provided by Google but using a d

Re: less secure apps

to log in. Then I've been able to use my account from > SeaMonkey just like before, even when I've set my Google account to > not allow "less secure apps". > > This appears o.k. but then I've found I'm not able to do the same > with my company account, which is also pro

Re: less secure apps

unt to not allow "less secure apps". This appears o.k. but then I've found I'm not able to do the same with my company account, which is also provided by Google but using a dedicated domain name (the company domain). For some reason my username in the OAuth2 login form is always changed

Re: less secure apps

On 04/16/2016 12:05 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:54:11 +0200, /Christian Riechers/: >> For Thunderbird OAuth2 only works for the gmail.com and googlemail.com >> domains. > > Doesn't appear true given my later comment. I probably should have been more specific. OAuth2 can

Re: less secure apps

Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:10:58 -0500, »Q« wrote: By default, Google only accepts OAuth 2.0 authentication. Enabling access by what Google calls "less secure apps" just lets you (or your SeaMonkey) use other methods of secure authentication to log in to your Gmail account. Except for Goo

Re: less secure apps

Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:54:11 +0200, /Christian Riechers/: For Thunderbird OAuth2 only works for the gmail.com and googlemail.com domains. Doesn't appear true given my later comment. On 04/16/2016 10:33 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: It's interesting that a colleague of mine using Thunderbird

Re: less secure apps

Settings / Authentication method of my > Gmail account (in SeaMonkey) to "OAuth2", and the first time I've tried > to open the Inbox I've been presented with a web form (in a new window) > to log in. Then I've been able to use my account from SeaMonkey just > like before, even w

Re: less secure apps

he Inbox I've been presented with a web form (in a new window) to log in. Then I've been able to use my account from SeaMonkey just like before, even when I've set my Google account to not allow "less secure apps". This appears o.k. but then I've found I'm not able to do the same with my c

Re: less secure apps

In , Rick Merrill wrote: > I have not heard of OAuth 2.0 - an open standard - is it not > compatible with seamonkey? I don't know. According to , Thunderbird

Re: less secure apps

n in my case was to enable "less secure apps". Can anyone explain what this is all about? By default, Google only accepts OAuth 2.0 authentication. Enabling access by what Google calls "less secure apps" just lets you (or your SeaMonkey) use other methods of secure authentication

Re: less secure apps

In <news:ckwdnd8hszppwzdknz2dnuu7-u_nn...@mozilla.org>, Rick Merrill <rick0.merr...@gmail.nospam.com> wrote: > - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39=2852231 > > I just ran into this and could not receive gmail via SeaMonkey. The > solution in my case was to

less secure apps

owser to display a HTML form provided by Google (which can do anything they want) , and then use a token that it returns." - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39=2852231 I just ran into this and could not receive gmail via SeaMonkey. The solution in my case was to enable "less secu