Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread JeffM
NoOp wrote: Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! I'm completely shocked. Their developers seem so talented. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://amtrak.com/ 374 Errors, 463 warning(s) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Not the inspired by Chrome, Firefox style versioning system please!

2011-07-10 Thread Chris Ilias
On 11-07-09 2:11 PM, Lee wrote: But the downside is that Mozilla is forcing everyone still using their browser to be alpha/beta testers by not keeping a stable version of the software supported. SeaMonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5 are stable. Why in the world the Mozilla folk think going to a rapid

Re: Not the inspired by Chrome, Firefox style versioning system please!

2011-07-10 Thread Chris Ilias
On 11-07-09 6:00 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-07-09 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote: This is exactly my opinion ... developpers are only interested to implement new gadgets instead of fixing bugs. SM is full of bugs that would never been corrected ... because those bug did not stop SM

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Daniel
NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: https://careers.amtrak.com/webdynpro/resources/sap.com/tc~wd~dispwda/global/noclient.htm Receive: Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! HTML HEAD TITLEWeb Dynpro client inspection/TITLE /HEAD BODY style=font-family:Arial; H2 Sorry,

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 not firefox Clicking on the Register Now took me to

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: They don't seem to accept anything above rv:1.9.2.* - quite broken sniffing, IMO. All sniffing is broken, IMO. -- -bts -This post best viewed with Internet Explorer 4.0 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Jay Garcia
On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: --- Original Message --- Can anyone else confirm: https://careers.amtrak.com/webdynpro/resources/sap.com/tc~wd~dispwda/global/noclient.htm Receive: Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! HTML HEAD TITLEWeb Dynpro client

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread PhillipJones
NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: https://careers.amtrak.com/webdynpro/resources/sap.com/tc~wd~dispwda/global/noclient.htm Receive: Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! HTML HEAD TITLEWeb Dynpro client inspection/TITLE /HEAD BODY style=font-family:Arial; H2 Sorry,

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread PhillipJones
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 not firefox Clicking on the Register Now took me to

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: Start here: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I get

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:29:33 -0400, /PhillipJones/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 not firefox Clicking on

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/9/11 9:11 PM, NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: https://careers.amtrak.com/webdynpro/resources/sap.com/tc~wd~dispwda/global/noclient.htm Receive: Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! HTML HEAD TITLEWeb Dynpro client inspection/TITLE /HEAD BODY

Re: SeaMonkey 2.2 on Windows 7: right-click on link produces oversized popup

2011-07-10 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:46:29 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:21:27 -0400, /Bob Fleischer/: Bob Fleischer wrote: I just upgraded to SeaMonkey 2.2, and right-clinks on links produced a grossly oversized popup menu, essentially full screen height, with the menu contents sometimes

Re: Not the inspired by Chrome, Firefox style versioning system please!

2011-07-10 Thread Lee
On 7/10/11, Chris Ilias n...@ilias.ca wrote: On 11-07-09 2:11 PM, Lee wrote: But the downside is that Mozilla is forcing everyone still using their browser to be alpha/beta testers by not keeping a stable version of the software supported. SeaMonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5 are stable. The

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Jay Garcia
On 10.07.2011 11:10, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: --- Original Message --- Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: Start here: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. FF 5 .. If I type in

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
. Error code: ICF-IE-http -c: 500 -u: RCF_UNREGSER -l: E -s: EKP -i: mssappk3_EKP_10 -w: 0 -d: 20110710 -t: 132839 -v: ERROR_MESSAGE_STATE -e: This browser is not supported HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error Your SAP Internet Communication Framework Team [end quote] I especially like that next

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread NoOp
On 07/10/2011 09:20 AM, David E. Ross wrote: ... At the bottom of http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer?c=Pagepagename=am%2FLayoutp=1241245669136cid=1241245669136, I see the following: Browser Requirements * The Careers website is best viewed with Internet Explorer 7 on Windows

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread JD
Jay Garcia wrote: On 10.07.2011 11:10, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: --- Original Message --- Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: Start here: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. FF

Re: can't access Lotus Notes web mail

2011-07-10 Thread NoOp
On 07/09/2011 08:58 PM, Jim wrote: NoOp wrote: On 07/05/2011 07:19 PM, Lee wrote: Remote XUL Perhaps this will work? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/remote-xul-manager/ Added ref: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/796170

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread NoOp
On 07/10/2011 10:30 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I get https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous as the correct page, not an error page. OK, now click Search for jobs and you get this: Error when processing your

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread NoOp
On 07/10/2011 05:28 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 not firefox Clicking on the Register Now took

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Ant
On 7/10/2011 9:20 AM PT, David E. Ross typed: I have filed an online complaint with the Amtrak Inspector General, citing a potential violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act because audio browsers for the blind might also be excluded. At the Inspector General's Web page, I found a link

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread PhillipJones
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: Start here: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I get

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread PhillipJones
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:29:33 -0400, /PhillipJones/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420

[Linux Mint 10] Adding Seamonkey as open with in Nautilus properties

2011-07-10 Thread Rob Lindauer
I've added Seamonkey as an open with choice via the Nautilus properties panel. But when I try to open an html file from Nautilus, I get a Do you want to run xxx.htm, or display its contents? prompt. Display opens Seamonkey; I don't know what Run does, but nothing seems to happen when I take

User Agent Switcher compatible with 2.2

2011-07-10 Thread Danny Kile
I upgrade to SM 2.2 and now my User Agent Switcher is not compatible, anyone know of any Add-On's that are compatible with SM 2.2? Thank you, ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread WLS
PhillipJones wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: Start here: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I

Re: [Linux Mint 10] Adding Seamonkey as open with in Nautilus properties

2011-07-10 Thread NoOp
On 07/10/2011 01:38 PM, Rob Lindauer wrote: I've added Seamonkey as an open with choice via the Nautilus properties panel. But when I try to open an html file from Nautilus, I get a Do you want to run xxx.htm, or display its contents? prompt. Display opens Seamonkey; I don't know what Run

Re: [Linux Mint 10] Adding Seamonkey as open with in Nautilus properties

2011-07-10 Thread Rob Lindauer
Rob Lindauer wrote: I've added Seamonkey as an open with choice via the Nautilus properties panel. But when I try to open an html file from Nautilus, I get a Do you want to run xxx.htm, or display its contents? prompt. Display opens Seamonkey; I don't know what Run does, but nothing seems to

Re: [Linux Mint 10] Adding Seamonkey as open with in Nautilus properties

2011-07-10 Thread Rob Lindauer
NoOp wrote: On 07/10/2011 01:38 PM, Rob Lindauer wrote: I've added Seamonkey as an open with choice via the Nautilus properties panel. But when I try to open an html file from Nautilus, I get a Do you want to run xxx.htm, or display its contents? prompt. Display opens Seamonkey; I don't know

Re: User Agent Switcher compatible with 2.2

2011-07-10 Thread Francesco Presel
Danny Kile ha scritto: I upgrade to SM 2.2 and now my User Agent Switcher is not compatible, anyone know of any Add-On's that are compatible with SM 2.2? Thank you, What do you mean by not compatible? Does it only say so, or does it really not work: in the first case, you can try manually

Re: User Agent Switcher compatible with 2.2

2011-07-10 Thread JD
Danny Kile wrote: I upgrade to SM 2.2 and now my User Agent Switcher is not compatible, anyone know of any Add-On's that are compatible with SM 2.2? Thank you, If you didn't remove it, you should be able to edit the install.rdf file and then it will report as compatible. -- JD..

Re: User Agent Switcher compatible with 2.2

2011-07-10 Thread W3BNR
On 7/10/2011 5:58 PM JD submitted the following: Danny Kile wrote: I upgrade to SM 2.2 and now my User Agent Switcher is not compatible, anyone know of any Add-On's that are compatible with SM 2.2? Thank you, If you didn't remove it, you should be able to edit the install.rdf file and then

Re: User Agent Switcher compatible with 2.2

2011-07-10 Thread Danny Kile
Francesco Presel wrote: Danny Kile ha scritto: I upgrade to SM 2.2 and now my User Agent Switcher is not compatible, anyone know of any Add-On's that are compatible with SM 2.2? Thank you, What do you mean by not compatible? Does it only say so, or does it really not work: in the first case,

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread Rick Merrill
NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: https://careers.amtrak.com/webdynpro/resources/sap.com/tc~wd~dispwda/global/noclient.htm It is HTTPS for heavens sake! I get the same message using IE8! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread NoOp
On 07/10/2011 04:09 PM, Rick Merrill wrote: NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: https://careers.amtrak.com/webdynpro/resources/sap.com/tc~wd~dispwda/global/noclient.htm It is HTTPS for heavens sake! I get the same message using IE8! Yes, so? However if you follow the links I

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread NoOp
On 07/10/2011 12:21 PM, PhillipJones wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: ... Are you sure Firefox 3.6.* doesn't go though? I'm able to go through sending just: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (rv:1.9.2) or even just: User-Agent: rv:1.9.2 Sending: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (rv:2.0) or:

SM 2.2 and Extensions

2011-07-10 Thread David E. Ross
I just installed SM 2.2 and found more extensions broken merely by the version number. With four profiles and four broken extensions in each, it took me about an hour to tweak them all. Part of the problem is that Add-ons Manager apparent no longer allows a generic declaration in install.rdf for

Re: User Agent Switcher compatible with 2.2

2011-07-10 Thread JD
Danny Kile wrote: Francesco Presel wrote: Danny Kile ha scritto: I upgrade to SM 2.2 and now my User Agent Switcher is not compatible, anyone know of any Add-On's that are compatible with SM 2.2? Thank you, What do you mean by not compatible? Does it only say so, or does it really not work:

Re: Not the inspired by Chrome, Firefox style versioning system please!

2011-07-10 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-07-09 2:11 PM, Lee wrote: ... SeaMonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5 are stable. But the automatic update script isn't even out yet. So 2.2 hasn't had a chance to spread yet. Of course it may be declared stable by edict, with all fixes later, in future versions,

Re: SM 2.2 and Extensions

2011-07-10 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 7/10/2011 8:34 PM, David E. Ross wrote: I just installed SM 2.2 and found more extensions broken merely by the version number. With four profiles and four broken extensions in each, it took me about an hour to tweak them all. Installing the Extension Compatability Reporter

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread PhillipJones
NoOp wrote: On 07/10/2011 12:21 PM, PhillipJones wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: ... Are you sure Firefox 3.6.* doesn't go though? I'm able to go through sending just: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (rv:1.9.2) or even just: User-Agent: rv:1.9.2 Sending: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (rv:2.0) or: