Ray_Net wrote:
I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels
When I use in html
The rendering by SM is superb
BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this
picture on the web-page ... He downloaded the original picture
1852x1852 which is 2.042 KB
To avoid this, I use
On 1/28/17, Ray_Net wrote:
> mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 15:27:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels
>>>
>>> When I use in html >> width="79" border="0"/>
>>>
>>> The rendering by SM is superb
>>>
>>>
On 1/27/17, Ray_Net wrote:
> EE wrote on 27-01-17 21:46:
>> Pete wrote:
Well, of course. You've reduced the quality by orders of magnitude.
>>>
>>> I think that what the OP is saying is that SM does a much better job of
>>> resizing the image than
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 15:27:
Ray_Net wrote:
I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels
When I use in html
The rendering by SM is superb
BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this
picture on the web-page ... He downloaded the
What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate for Firefox
only and is snooping on the network traffic.
FRG
MNeeks wrote:
"This Connection is Untrusted" message only comes up in SeaMonkey, not on
Firefox. All of a sudden I can't use SeaMonkey anymore to browse and it is
On 28/01/2017 00:12, Ray_Net wrote:
Lucas Levrel wrote on 27-01-17 22:40:
Le 27 janvier 2017, à 19:32, Mason83 a écrit :
Would you say "presque mieux" is equivalent to
"presque aussi bien/bon" ?
No. There is an intended, amusing contradiction in "presque mieux",
just as in "almost better".
Lee wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels
When I use in html
The rendering by SM is superb
BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this
picture on the web-page ... He downloaded the original picture
1852x1852 which is 2.042 KB
To avoid
On 1/28/2017 10:57 AM, MNeeks wrote:
What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate for Firefox
only and is snooping on the network traffic.
FRG
I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just discovered that if I pause
protection SeaMonkey will load my normal websites
Ray_Net wrote:
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 15:27:
Ray_Net wrote:
I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels
When I use in html
The rendering by SM is superb
BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this
picture on the web-page ... He
On 1/28/17, Richmond wrote:
> MNeeks writes:
>
>>> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate
>>> for Firefox only and is snooping on the network traffic.
>>>
>>> FRG
>>>
>> I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just discovered
> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate for
> Firefox
> only and is snooping on the network traffic.
>
> FRG
>
I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just discovered that if I pause
protection SeaMonkey will load my normal websites with no errors. Hmmm.
On 1/28/17, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com
wrote:
> Lee wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
> I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels
>
> When I use in html width="79" border="0"/>
>
> The rendering by SM is superb
>
> BUT
Ray_Net schrieb:
> The zoom was and is always at 100% I have used 79x79 because I have
> other "logo" on the same line, so each logo have the same height 79.
> You can see the result at the end of this page:
> http://www.randoevasion.be/index.php?lang=fr
These pics at the end of the page (i.e.
MNeeks writes:
>> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate
>> for Firefox only and is snooping on the network traffic.
>>
>> FRG
>>
> I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just discovered that if I
> pause protection SeaMonkey will load my
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 18:10:
Ray_Net wrote:
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 15:27:
Ray_Net wrote:
I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels
When I use in html
The rendering by SM is superb
BUT using this have a side effect that
Stefan Blumenrath wrote on 28-01-17 21:36:
Ray_Net schrieb:
The zoom was and is always at 100% I have used 79x79 because I have
other "logo" on the same line, so each logo have the same height 79.
You can see the result at the end of this page:
http://www.randoevasion.be/index.php?lang=fr
On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 12:26:04 PM UTC-5, Richmond wrote:
> MNeeks writes:
>
> >> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate
> >> for Firefox only and is snooping on the network traffic.
> >>
> >> FRG
> >>
> > I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just
On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 1:48:47 PM UTC-5, Lemuel Johnson wrote:
> On 1/28/2017 10:57 AM, MNeeks wrote:
> >
> >> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate for
> >> Firefox
> >> only and is snooping on the network traffic.
> >>
> >> FRG
> >>
> > I have Kaspersky
18 matches
Mail list logo