Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne
Ray_Net wrote: I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels When I use in html The rendering by SM is superb BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this picture on the web-page ... He downloaded the original picture 1852x1852 which is 2.042 KB To avoid this, I use

Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread Lee
On 1/28/17, Ray_Net wrote: > mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 15:27: >> Ray_Net wrote: >>> I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels >>> >>> When I use in html >> width="79" border="0"/> >>> >>> The rendering by SM is superb >>> >>>

Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread Lee
On 1/27/17, Ray_Net wrote: > EE wrote on 27-01-17 21:46: >> Pete wrote: Well, of course. You've reduced the quality by orders of magnitude. >>> >>> I think that what the OP is saying is that SM does a much better job of >>> resizing the image than

Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread Ray_Net
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 15:27: Ray_Net wrote: I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels When I use in html The rendering by SM is superb BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this picture on the web-page ... He downloaded the

Re: "This connection is untrusted"

2017-01-28 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate for Firefox only and is snooping on the network traffic. FRG MNeeks wrote: "This Connection is Untrusted" message only comes up in SeaMonkey, not on Firefox. All of a sudden I can't use SeaMonkey anymore to browse and it is

Re: THANKS A LOT - Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread Alex Beauroy
On 28/01/2017 00:12, Ray_Net wrote: Lucas Levrel wrote on 27-01-17 22:40: Le 27 janvier 2017, à 19:32, Mason83 a écrit : Would you say "presque mieux" is equivalent to "presque aussi bien/bon" ? No. There is an intended, amusing contradiction in "presque mieux", just as in "almost better".

Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne
Lee wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels When I use in html The rendering by SM is superb BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this picture on the web-page ... He downloaded the original picture 1852x1852 which is 2.042 KB To avoid

Re: "This connection is untrusted"

2017-01-28 Thread Lemuel Johnson
On 1/28/2017 10:57 AM, MNeeks wrote: What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate for Firefox only and is snooping on the network traffic. FRG I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just discovered that if I pause protection SeaMonkey will load my normal websites

Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne
Ray_Net wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 15:27: Ray_Net wrote: I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels When I use in html The rendering by SM is superb BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this picture on the web-page ... He

Re: "This connection is untrusted"

2017-01-28 Thread Lee
On 1/28/17, Richmond wrote: > MNeeks writes: > >>> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate >>> for Firefox only and is snooping on the network traffic. >>> >>> FRG >>> >> I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just discovered

Re: "This connection is untrusted"

2017-01-28 Thread MNeeks
> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate for > Firefox > only and is snooping on the network traffic. > > FRG > I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just discovered that if I pause protection SeaMonkey will load my normal websites with no errors. Hmmm.

Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread Lee
On 1/28/17, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > Lee wrote: Ray_Net wrote: > I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels > > When I use in html width="79" border="0"/> > > The rendering by SM is superb > > BUT

Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread Stefan Blumenrath
Ray_Net schrieb: > The zoom was and is always at 100% I have used 79x79 because I have > other "logo" on the same line, so each logo have the same height 79. > You can see the result at the end of this page: > http://www.randoevasion.be/index.php?lang=fr These pics at the end of the page (i.e.

Re: "This connection is untrusted"

2017-01-28 Thread Richmond
MNeeks writes: >> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate >> for Firefox only and is snooping on the network traffic. >> >> FRG >> > I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just discovered that if I > pause protection SeaMonkey will load my

Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread Ray_Net
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 18:10: Ray_Net wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28-01-17 15:27: Ray_Net wrote: I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels When I use in html The rendering by SM is superb BUT using this have a side effect that

Re: BIG IMAGE

2017-01-28 Thread Ray_Net
Stefan Blumenrath wrote on 28-01-17 21:36: Ray_Net schrieb: The zoom was and is always at 100% I have used 79x79 because I have other "logo" on the same line, so each logo have the same height 79. You can see the result at the end of this page: http://www.randoevasion.be/index.php?lang=fr

Re: "This connection is untrusted"

2017-01-28 Thread MNeeks
On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 12:26:04 PM UTC-5, Richmond wrote: > MNeeks writes: > > >> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate > >> for Firefox only and is snooping on the network traffic. > >> > >> FRG > >> > > I have Kaspersky and interestingly enough, just

Re: "This connection is untrusted"

2017-01-28 Thread MNeeks
On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 1:48:47 PM UTC-5, Lemuel Johnson wrote: > On 1/28/2017 10:57 AM, MNeeks wrote: > > > >> What virus scanner are you using? Maybe it installed a certificate for > >> Firefox > >> only and is snooping on the network traffic. > >> > >> FRG > >> > > I have Kaspersky