On 1/27/17, Ray_Net <[email protected]> wrote: > EE wrote on 27-01-17 21:46: >> Pete wrote: >>>> Well, of course. You've reduced the quality by orders of magnitude. >>> >>> I think that what the OP is saying is that SM does a much better job of >>> resizing the image than IrfanView, and he wants to know how (or what >>> software to use) to get a better quality smaller image. >>> >>> Peter >>> >> If it is a jpeg file, save it with 100% instead of using the default. >> You lose less data that way. >> > It was saved with 100% ....
Which doesn't get you any compression. Can you try this: open original image in irfanview <ctrl>R (Image / Resize/Resample) select radio button for Set new size set Width: 79 select radio button for Units: pixels Set check mark for Preserve aspect ratio Clear check mark for Apply sharpen after Resample, Adjust DPI based on new sizes select Size method: radio button Resample (better quality), use Filter select Lanczos (slowest) from drop-down menu Clear check marks for Use fast Resample filter for image shrinking, Try to improve gamma for Resample OK File / Save as Save as type: JPG - JPG/JPEG Format Set check mark for Show options dialog 1st try: clear all check marks on JPEG/GIF save options window except for - Try to save with original JPG quality Save 2nd try: clear check mark for Try to save with original JPG quality set Save quality slider to 75 Save What I got for a 2MB file with an image quality 96: - Save with original quality results in 5KB file - Save with quality: 75 results in 2KB file Regards, Lee _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
