Daniel wrote...
What's this doing in the SeaMonkey group??
Sure we're waiting on TB 3.0 to be finalized before SM 2.0 will be
outed, but really!!
Daniel
Daniel...
SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3 are essentially inexorably linked, like it or not.
Knowing at least the status of TBird 3
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Martin Feitag wrote:
PS: As said for an alpha it's very stable, don't compare it too much
with other alphas you might have tested, as the codebase is pretty
mature. Of course it's not recommended to replace SM1 with SM2 yet in
a productivity environment but having SM2
NoOp wrote:
On 07/08/2009 06:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
JR WG wrote:
Also sending separate Email to you, Ludovic...
RE: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3 starting Thursday July 9th 2009
Can you verify that we can test Thunderbird 3 without overwriting or losing our
existing TBird 2 access or
»MAP« wrote:
I installed SeaMonkey 1.1.17 and my mail worked. For some reason it
stopped working correctly. Now I have a big gray area on the bottom of
my screen with a red arrow head on the left side. I can only open one
email, then my email locks up. I have to shut down SeaMonkey,
Brian Mailman wrote:
I have CCleaner, which seems pretty good at that sort of thing.
CCleaner is great, but it doesn't know about SeaMonkey's extensions. It
only knows about its history, its cache, and its cookies.
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Martin Feitag wrote:
Tony schrieb:
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 08.07.2009 12:01, Walter wrote:
--- Original Message ---
I frequently get the following message:
{A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped
responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see
if the
I re-installed this add-on and got a message that no profile was
available, Now I can't seem to access the program (I see nothing any
where about it in my browser)- what am I missing?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
me2 schrieb:
I re-installed this add-on and got a message that no profile was
available, Now I can't seem to access the program (I see nothing any
where about it in my browser)- what am I missing?
Sry, but if it didn't find a profile to install to, you can't expect it
to work afterwards.
NoOp wrote:
I've found, for the most part, that the 2.0b1pre is, IMO, more stable
than 2.0a. With the exception of one or two instances, the 2.0b1pre has
been pretty solid I use it on 4 production machines. I of course have
1.1.17 also installed as a backup, but so far the only time that I ever
Has anyone found a practical way to do this, preferably without running any
involved Gecko application?
When all bookmarks depended exclusively on bookmarks.html, it was easy to
share by simply copying that file from whichever profile was used to maintain
it to any other profile that wished to
Martin Feitag wrote:
David Weintraub schrieb:
Using Seamonkey 1.1.17 and can not open Gmail in standard view only
basic view. Works in Firefox 3.x.xx
Is that the link at the top right corner of the page between the
settings and help? If yes, then I can switch between both views in
SM1.1.17
Barbara Norvell wrote:
I use the Humana website and am having a problem with one page
I get the error message:
This feature is currently unavailable[...]
I can get the page to come up on a PC.
A PC is **hardware**; it can run MANY operating systems.
One assumes you mean Windoze.
What browser were
Actually, I guessing its referring to the foxforecast profile - now
oddly enough now and then ifox weather does show up, but not each
time- restarting seamonkey or even cold/warm boot seemly making no
difference.
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:05:47 +0200, Martin Feitag
prof_nosp...@quantentunnel.de
On 07/09/09 11:52 am, Felix Miata wrote:
Has anyone found a practical way to do this, preferably without running any
involved Gecko application?
Is there any convenient and practical way to share bookmarks without
destroying history?
I imagine it shouldn't be too hard for someone with the
Felix Miata wrote:
Is there any convenient and practical way to share bookmarks without
destroying history?
You are the owner/user of the bookmarks and history, not the
browser(s). Why not have all browsers share all data?
Where possible - I don't really have a handle on the transition to
15 matches
Mail list logo
