This one gets my vote for the year's worst subject line. Says nothing
about the content, and looks for all the world like spam.
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
DoctorBill wrote:
So far 2.6.1 is working and it imported all my E-Mail, Passwords and
Favorites from SM 1.1 w/o any problemsknock on wood !
I wanted to stay with SM 1.1 because the Tabbed Browser (Piro) gave
me tabs when I clicked on anything.
Now the 2.6.1's tabs require me to remember
On 27/12/11 04:09, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
In their 12/22/2011 security bulletin,
@RISK: The Consensus Security Vulnerability Alert Week 52 2011
SANS reports the following vulnerabilities in Mozilla FF TB releases.
Since SM code is so closely related to the Moz. FF TB codes,
which, if any,
On 28/12/11 00:12, Rob Lindauer wrote:
When I download a file and then attempt to open containing folder
(either by right clicking the downloaded file name, or from the File
menu option), SM attempts to start the pdf document viewer (evince).
I get this same behavior no matter what the file
On 24/12/11 13:34, Desiree wrote:
Dustbindustbin_addr...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote in message
news:l5qdnwyww4jcagntnz2dnuvz_vwdn...@mozilla.org...
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Dustbin schrieb:
It should not be necessary to spoof firefox.
You're right that it should not, but in many cases it
Daniel wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
So far 2.6.1 is working and it imported all my E-Mail, Passwords and
Favorites from SM 1.1 w/o any problemsknock on wood !
I wanted to stay with SM 1.1 because the Tabbed Browser (Piro) gave
me tabs when I clicked on anything.
Now the 2.6.1's tabs require
On 12/27/11 10:06 PM, DoctorBill wrote:
So far 2.6.1 is working and it imported all my E-Mail, Passwords and
Favorites from SM 1.1 w/o any problemsknock on wood !
I wanted to stay with SM 1.1 because the Tabbed Browser (Piro) gave
me tabs when I clicked on anything.
Now the 2.6.1's
On 12/28/11 6:19 AM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 27/12/11 04:09, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
In their 12/22/2011 security bulletin,
@RISK: The Consensus Security Vulnerability Alert Week 52 2011
SANS reports the following vulnerabilities in Mozilla FF TB releases.
Since SM code is so closely
On 23/12/11 11:39, Dustbin wrote:
Edmund wrote:
Dustbin wrote:
It should not be necessary to spoof firefox.
If people wrote their code to work to TCP/IP standard protocols SM would
work.
Do you mean putting FireFox in the UA string? If so, that has (AFAIU)
nothing to do with the TCP/IP
David E. Ross schrieb:
That page should distinguish between SM 2.6 and SM 2.6.1. Otherwise,
some users will mistakenly think that security flaws actually fixed
between the two were instead already fixed in 2.6.
2.6 and 2.6.1 are the same security-wise, no need to distinguish anything.
Robert
On Dec 23, 7:38 pm, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid wrote:
On 12/23/2011 05:33 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/23/2011 02:44 PM, Petr Voralek wrote:
Hello!
I use 64-bit version of SeaMonkey for linux (Debian GNU/Linux testing
(Wheezy), KDE 4.6.5).
Starting with version 2.6
Hello.
Is there a way to have SM v2.0.14's e-mail client to sort by e-mails'
oldest to newest dates when using thread setup? It seems it only sort
from newest to oldest in the threads?
Thank you in advance. ;)
--
Are you slower than an ant? --Sai Yuk from The Legend of Fong Sai Yuk
movie
Hello.
Is there a way to have SM v2.0.14's e-mail client to sort by e-mails'
oldest to newest dates when using thread setup? It seems it only sort
from newest to oldest in the threads in each thread. Usenet/Newsgroup
threads seem OK though like in this news.mozilla.org news server.
Thank
Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is there a way to have SM v2.0.14's e-mail client to sort by e-mails'
oldest to newest dates when using thread setup? It seems it only sort
from newest to oldest in the threads?
Thank you in advance. ;)
Click on subject column header in list should reverse from newest to
On 12/28/2011 3:17 PM PT, PhillipJones typed:
Is there a way to have SM v2.0.14's e-mail client to sort by e-mails'
oldest to newest dates when using thread setup? It seems it only sort
from newest to oldest in the threads?
Thank you in advance. ;)
Click on subject column header in list
DoctorBill wrote:
OKhere I am again updating and lost - again !
I have and been using SM 1.1 (with all my important mail, favorites,
etc), SM 2.0 (hardly used) and now SM 2.6.1.
SM 2.0 is not on the Windows Add Remove Software list !
All three of the Profiles seem spread out all over the
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/28/11 10:08 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
That page should distinguish between SM 2.6 and SM 2.6.1. Otherwise,
some users will mistakenly think that security flaws actually fixed
between the two were instead already fixed in 2.6.
2.6 and 2.6.1
17 matches
Mail list logo
