Re: Experimental Win32 SeaMonkey 2.35-Gamma build.
On 27/06/2015 2:58 AM, Philip Chee wrote: Details at Mozillazine: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=14212961#p14212961 Please help smoke test this build. Phil Gamma comes after Beta, so is this a sort of Release Candidate?? -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey startup taking longer.
I have noticed over a period of several months that each time I update Seamonkey (currently 2.33.1) it seems to take longer to open when called upon. I have timed it and the delay before an operational browser is available has been up to two minutes. Is this normal? I do not have extensions or add ons except for User Agent switcher and Last Pass Security. I have two PC's and a laptop, the second PC has only User Agent Switcher and all three experience this delay. Is there a setting I am missing or could this be an ISP problem. I have Cox Cable which is the so called fastest in this area. Any thoughts would be appreciated. azed13 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
when will be IMAP compression be fixed?
Hello all, does somone know when/if the crashing during IMAP compression will be fixed? Such as: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/199372c5-0048-4147-af70-86f652150622 TIA Gabriel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What version of SM is used by most here?
WaltS48 wrote: On 06/25/2015 09:10 PM, cmcadams wrote: chicagofan wrote: What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade, because my short term memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the steps to upgrade [safely]. I'm assuming instructions will still be at the site where the downloads are. Anyone have a feeling which version has the least problems now? I'm being pushed to do this, because when I was forced to use Firefox the other day to do something, they updated it to version 31. [I didn't know it was set to auto update, I have now changed that.] I will appreciate any suggestions to reduce my anxiety, and take pity on me, because I'm old. :) bj I'm still on 2.26.1, but that's for very specific reasons that very likely wouldn't apply to you. As far as upgrading goes, I've discovered you can do it with wild abandon. Just uninstall the old, run the new installer. It really is as simple as that. My data has always remained intact. Why do all of that? All of what? Using 2.26.1 or the way I do updates (when I do them)? Doesn't Help Check for Updates, or Automatically check for updates work? I don't check for updates at present. I see them in passing, but I'm not interested. One of my very specific reasons for staying with 2.26.1 has to do with how the HTML email editor still functions. As opposed to the non-functioning evident in later versions. At least the ones I've tried. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey CPU spin
On 27/06/2015 9:35 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rodney Sampson wrote: ... Looks like an array indexing issue... Starting SM in Safe Mode add-ons are disabled, cache , cookies offline are cleared before start. Questions: Is there any way to log exactly what SM is doing ? What websites it's downloading from , etc ? On the average, I have to kill/restart 20 times per day. Getting old fast... I have moved subfolders from the inbox sent, trash junk are emptied multiple times daily. No pre-defined folders have 300 messages. Wish there was a rule or add-on that would save the attachment automatically to a folder. More suggestions please ? Can we assume that you've been compacting folders periodically or after large-scale deletions? Remember, delete, as it does elsewhere in the computing world, means hide from the user. So a folder that has undergone multiple deletions will have a lot of hidden content that the program must purposely disregard, and the index file will be needlessly complex. Rodney, when you move messages from the Inbox or Sent folders into other folder or sub-folders, they are not necessarily moved to the other folder, but, rather, copied into the new location. To actually get rid of them from the original location try File-Empty Trash and then File-Compact Folders. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Does sync-ing work in SeaMonkey?
Hello. I've used Firefox for a long time, but I'm unhappy with their recent changes and current direction. I'm switching to SeaMonkey. The only reason I use Firefox at all anymore is to manage bookmarks, since I haven't been able to sync my SeaMonkey profile/account/whatever between computers. I've tried many times, but it never works. So, is it possible to sync using SeaMonkey? If anyone likes, I can describe exactly what happens when I attempt to sync with SeaMonkey. Greg Spradlin sprad...@outlook.com 386-589-6521 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What version of SM is used by most here?
Ray Davison wrote: chicagofan wrote: What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade, That is why I don't upgrade. I install the new without effecting the previous. Sometimes the new has problems, or maybe you just don't like it. You can have as many versions as you have space on the HDD. I have had as many as twenty two. And they can all use the same profile or different profiles. Be careful using the same profile between different versions. Sometimes a newer version introduces a new format for some of the files in the profile. The release notes usually mention when that happens, but I wouldn't like to rely on it. It usually converts an old profile to the new format on first use, but that profile may not then work properly with older versions (and trying to use an older version with a profile for a newer version may corrupt the profile). When I decide I don't need/want one of them I delete it. But, to answer your question, I am using 2.33, on W7U-64, and have no issues. I'm using SeaMonkey 2.33.1 on Windows Vista, and don't have any major problems. That's not to say there aren't any - just that I don't find they affect things I frequently use. Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: This connection is untrusted
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Without that information, I can't be sure, but my first suspicion is that the your new computer doesn't have the right date set, so SeaMonkey thinks the certificates have expired or are not yet valid. Make sure the date, time and time zone are set correctly - right-click the clock in the taskbar, select Adjust Date/Time (or similar); the details vary from one version of Windows to another, but hopefully it should be fairly clear what to do from there. His message header contains the following: X-Received: by 10.140.96.137 with SMTP id k9mr66228qge.10.1435380087335; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:41:27 -0700 (PDT) ... Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:41:27 -0700 (PDT) The first is set by the receiving mail server (I chose the first recipient in the chain of custody), and the second by the sending computer. Since they match and both specify a very recent date/time (last night), it seems unlikely that there is a date/time issue. Unless, of course, he wasn't sending from the problem computer. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: This connection is untrusted
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Without that information, I can't be sure, but my first suspicion is that the your new computer doesn't have the right date set, so SeaMonkey thinks the certificates have expired or are not yet valid. Make sure the date, time and time zone are set correctly - right-click the clock in the taskbar, select Adjust Date/Time (or similar); the details vary from one version of Windows to another, but hopefully it should be fairly clear what to do from there. His message header contains the following: X-Received: by 10.140.96.137 with SMTP id k9mr66228qge.10.1435380087335; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:41:27 -0700 (PDT) ... Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:41:27 -0700 (PDT) The first is set by the receiving mail server (I chose the first recipient in the chain of custody), and the second by the sending computer. Since they match and both specify a very recent date/time (last night), it seems unlikely that there is a date/time issue. Unless, of course, he wasn't sending from the problem computer. Also in the headers from Rick's message: User-Agent: G2/1.0 Which I think someone mentioned a few weeks ago means the message was posted via Google Groups, so the timestamps in the message are probably derived from Google's servers and not the date on his own computer. And, as you say, there's the possibility he was sending from a computer other than the one exhibiting the problem anyway. Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey CPU spin
... Looks like an array indexing issue... Starting SM in Safe Mode add-ons are disabled, cache , cookies offline are cleared before start. Questions: Is there any way to log exactly what SM is doing ? What websites it's downloading from , etc ? On the average, I have to kill/restart 20 times per day. Getting old fast... I have moved subfolders from the inbox sent, trash junk are emptied multiple times daily. No pre-defined folders have 300 messages. Wish there was a rule or add-on that would save the attachment automatically to a folder. More suggestions please ? Can we assume that you've been compacting folders periodically or after large-scale deletions? Remember, delete, as it does elsewhere in the computing world, means hide from the user. So a folder that has undergone multiple deletions will have a lot of hidden content that the program must purposely disregard, and the index file will be needlessly complex. Rodney, when you move messages from the Inbox or Sent folders into other folder or sub-folders, they are not necessarily moved to the other folder, but, rather, copied into the new location. To actually get rid of them from the original location try File-Empty Trash and then File-Compact Folders. -- Daniel What's the best way to rebuild the indexes ? Would that explain CPU Spin when reading a message ? Thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey CPU spin
Rodney Sampson wrote: What's the best way to rebuild the indexes ? Right-click on mail folder Properties Repair Folder Would that explain CPU Spin when reading a message ? Did see where you said that you have compacted folders, if you haven't the data is still there and must be parsed even thought deleted. My profile has a long legacy from NN 4.x and I have ~4GB data in my mail folders and do not have your issue...just saying. -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey startup taking longer.
azed13 wrote: I have noticed over a period of several months that each time I update Seamonkey (currently 2.33.1) it seems to take longer to open when called upon. I have timed it and the delay before an operational browser is available has been up to two minutes. Is this normal? I do not have extensions or add ons except for User Agent switcher and Last Pass Security. I have two PC's and a laptop, the second PC has only User Agent Switcher and all three experience this delay. Is there a setting I am missing or could this be an ISP problem. I have Cox Cable which is the so called fastest in this area. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Switch your home page to blank or a local HTML page and test to take Cox out of the equation. -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: This connection is untrusted
Rick Daly wrote: PLEASE! Can someone please help me? A few days ago I installed Seamonkey 2.33 on a brand new computer. For a couple of days all worked fine. I was able to transfer all my bookmarks and passwords and settings from my old computer using MozBackup. Then I started having problems with this This connection is untrusted message. It was hit and miss at first, now it stops me from doing virtually anything. I even had to add an exception for the Seamonkey Project website. That message indicates something is up with the digital certificates used to set up a secure connection to the website. It's not a good idea to add exceptions without understanding what the problem is, particularly for important things like your bank. I can't get into my banks, I can't even get to Youtube. Some strange looking screen pops up. Seamonkey 2.33 is working fine on my older computer. I checked all the settings, comparing one to the other and nothing is different. What could have happened? I don't want to ditch Seamonkey. It's been my go to browser for years. I will NOT use Internet Explorer, and don't really like Chrome or anything else I've tried. Are both computers using the same Internet connection? Can anyone give me some guidance as to what the hell is going on and how, maybe, to fix it? Click on Technical Details and it should give some more information. It may not mean much to you, but copy that text and paste it into a reply to this post. Without that information, I can't be sure, but my first suspicion is that the your new computer doesn't have the right date set, so SeaMonkey thinks the certificates have expired or are not yet valid. Make sure the date, time and time zone are set correctly - right-click the clock in the taskbar, select Adjust Date/Time (or similar); the details vary from one version of Windows to another, but hopefully it should be fairly clear what to do from there. Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What version of SM is used by most here?
Paul in Houston TX wrote: Daniel wrote: On 26/06/2015 8:48 AM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Snip That has not happened to me since 1991. 1991!! What did you use back then Mosaic or something?? (I can only go back as far as Netscape Navigator 0.9 in 1995 or 1996!) Good question. I don't remember what I used. Might have been via BBS. Ah... yea, I think there was some sort of cat... puma, tiger, or something. Lynx, perhaps? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynx_%28web_browser%29 First released in 1992 according to Wikipedia, but it's a cat from the right era and I could believe that date may not be exactly correct. Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: when will be IMAP compression be fixed?
W dniu 06/27/2015 o 12:17 PM, Gabriel pisze: does somone know when/if the crashing during IMAP compression will be fixed? See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1066998#c58 (the 2.36 builds are here (unfortunately, no OSX): https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/ ) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does sync-ing work in SeaMonkey?
On 06/27/2015 10:58 AM, Greg Spradlin wrote: Hello. I've used Firefox for a long time, but I'm unhappy with their recent changes and current direction. I'm switching to SeaMonkey. The only reason I use Firefox at all anymore is to manage bookmarks, since I haven't been able to sync my SeaMonkey profile/account/whatever between computers. I've tried many times, but it never works. So, is it possible to sync using SeaMonkey? If anyone likes, I can describe exactly what happens when I attempt to sync with SeaMonkey. Greg Spradlin No. [998807 – Sync account creation or device pairing fails with exception in BrowserIDManager](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=998807) You cannot set up a new Sync account or pair a device anymore (bug 998807). Workaround: Use an older version of SeaMonkey for such tasks for now. Release notes can be very informative. [SeaMonkey 2.33 Release Notes](http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.33/#issues) -- Kubuntu 14.10 | KDE 4.14.1 | Thunderbird 41.0a1(Daily) Go Bucs! [Coexist · Understanding Across Divides](https://www.coexist.org/) [Visit Pittsburgh](http://www.visitpittsburgh.com) [2015 EQT Pittsburgh Three Rivers Regatta](http://www.yougottaregatta.com/) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey startup taking longer.
Jonathan N. Little wrote: azed13 wrote: I have noticed over a period of several months that each time I update Seamonkey (currently 2.33.1) it seems to take longer to open when called upon. I have timed it and the delay before an operational browser is available has been up to two minutes. Is this normal? I do not have extensions or add ons except for User Agent switcher and Last Pass Security. I have two PC's and a laptop, the second PC has only User Agent Switcher and all three experience this delay. Is there a setting I am missing or could this be an ISP problem. I have Cox Cable which is the so called fastest in this area. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Switch your home page to blank or a local HTML page and test to take Cox out of the equation. Thank you, I will try that. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What version of SM is used by most here?
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Paul in Houston TX wrote: Daniel wrote: On 26/06/2015 8:48 AM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Snip That has not happened to me since 1991. 1991!! What did you use back then Mosaic or something?? (I can only go back as far as Netscape Navigator 0.9 in 1995 or 1996!) Good question. I don't remember what I used. Might have been via BBS. Ah... yea, I think there was some sort of cat... puma, tiger, or something. Lynx, perhaps? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynx_%28web_browser%29 First released in 1992 according to Wikipedia, but it's a cat from the right era and I could believe that date may not be exactly correct. Mark. That could be it. It was text based with pretty ascii colors. I think I used a time share through IBM??? to get to the internet. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does sync-ing work in SeaMonkey?
W dniu 06/27/2015 o 05:17 PM, WaltS48 pisze: On 06/27/2015 10:58 AM, Greg Spradlin wrote: So, is it possible to sync using SeaMonkey? If anyone likes, I can describe exactly what happens when I attempt to sync with SeaMonkey. No. That's not the correct answer. The correct answer is: yes, it is possible, but: You have to downgrade to SeaMonkey 2.25 and set up Sync there. Then you can update to the latest SeaMonkey release and still use Sync ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WebGL Doesn't Work
On 28.06.15 1:03, Tom Pamin wrote: On site radarbox24.com, I get an error when going to cockpit view for a specific plane. It used to work, but now it says my browser supports WebGL, but initialization failed. This does work on my other laptop running SM. Can someone help? HP xp media centre sp3 Seamonkey 2.33.1 cockpit view slow, but nicely looking. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WebGL Doesn't Work
Burry wrote: On 28.06.15 1:03, Tom Pamin wrote: On site radarbox24.com, I get an error when going to cockpit view for a specific plane. It used to work, but now it says my browser supports WebGL, but initialization failed. This does work on my other laptop running SM. Can someone help? HP xp media centre sp3 Seamonkey 2.33.1 cockpit view slow, but nicely looking. I fixed it by force enabling WebGL, by going about:config and setting webgl.force-enabled=true. Now I see this site doesn't even load in IE11, even though it says WebGL is enabled. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What version of SM is used by most here?
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Be careful using the same profile between different versions. Sometimes a newer version introduces a new format for some of the files in the profile. My files began life in Netscape. I only recall once in recent times when I needed different profiles for different versions; early 2X. And because my profiles wander between several desktops and laptops I have several backups without any extra effort. Ray ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
WebGL Doesn't Work
On site radarbox24.com, I get an error when going to cockpit view for a specific plane. It used to work, but now it says my browser supports WebGL, but initialization failed. This does work on my other laptop running SM. Can someone help? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What version of SM is used by most here?
chicagofan wrote: hawker wrote: On 6/25/2015 5:06 PM, chicagofan wrote: What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade, because my short term memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the steps to upgrade [safely]. I'm assuming instructions will still be at the site where the downloads are. Anyone have a feeling which version has the least problems now? I'm being pushed to do this, because when I was forced to use Firefox the other day to do something, they updated it to version 31. [I didn't know it was set to auto update, I have now changed that.] I will appreciate any suggestions to reduce my anxiety, and take pity on me, because I'm old. :) bj I'm also still on 2.26.1, Win XP. I'm not having any major problems with it other than some minor IMAP issues that are easy to deal with. From what I can tell the few versions after all have bugs that would be show stoppers for me. I read this group all the time, and that is the opinion I had formed. Lately I decided I might risk 2.26.l, but before I did, wanted to check to see if more people than I thought, were using the very latest versions ... with no problems. :) I'm not worried about security. I keep the big holes (Flash, Acrobat, Java, etc) up to date, use Addblock Plus which tends to stop a lot of virus believe it or not and have good virus software. The only hacks I have ever gotten since the 1990s are due to Acrobat, Java, or Flash exploits. I don't open stupid things. That's essentially how I feel about my usage as well. What's most important to me is the stability of mail and newsgroup functions, and since my friends and I use HTML for mail sharing of news, photos, etc., the changes with HTML are presenting a problem I want to avoid. Lately some image attachments have not been copied in my mail replies as well. I wanted to thank each person individually that responded to my plea for help, but that would just fill the newsgroup needlessly, so I hope my thanks here will suffice. :) I was glad to see that some of you are using 2.33 successfully, and I will read it's release notes again ... just in case, I feel daring when I start this project. ;) Like Stan, I'm still on 2.17.1 because I don't need to be in sync with all the world's gadgets ... just able to read websites that continually change. ;) The comments about HTML mail editor from cmcadams sort of reinforce my feelings about 2.26.1 being a safe move though. Thanks again everyone! I probably will screw something up and be back, after I attempt the upgrade. Hope you're still as patient with me. :) Barbara ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WebGL Doesn't Work
Tom Pamin wrote: On site radarbox24.com, I get an error when going to cockpit view for a specific plane. It used to work, but now it says my browser supports WebGL, but initialization failed. This does work on my other laptop running SM. Can someone help? Also on this test site, it says Nay for my current laptop, and Yay for my older laptop. Must be something in the settings for my current laptop that is blocking WebGL. http://www.doesmybrowsersupportwebgl.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WebGL Doesn't Work
Tom Pamin wrote: On site radarbox24.com, I get an error when going to cockpit view for a specific plane. It used to work, but now it says my browser supports WebGL, but initialization failed. This does work on my other laptop running SM. Can someone help? Try flightradar24.com. Set '3D' Aircraft on bubbles off. You might have to stop 2 scripts and wait a few moments for data to load but this works fine for me with SM on a Mac. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WebGL Doesn't Work
HilsB wrote: Tom Pamin wrote: On site radarbox24.com, I get an error when going to cockpit view for a specific plane. It used to work, but now it says my browser supports WebGL, but initialization failed. This does work on my other laptop running SM. Can someone help? Try flightradar24.com. Set '3D' Aircraft on bubbles off. You might have to stop 2 scripts and wait a few moments for data to load but this works fine for me with SM on a Mac. I use that site too. I have trouble on all 3 of my PC's with cockpit view there. Lots of shimmering and breaking up with aircraft off. Works fine with aircraft on though on all PC's. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WebGL Doesn't Work
Tom Pamin wrote: Burry wrote: On 28.06.15 1:03, Tom Pamin wrote: On site radarbox24.com, I get an error when going to cockpit view for a specific plane. It used to work, but now it says my browser supports WebGL, but initialization failed. This does work on my other laptop running SM. Can someone help? HP xp media centre sp3 Seamonkey 2.33.1 cockpit view slow, but nicely looking. I fixed it by force enabling WebGL, by going about:config and setting webgl.force-enabled=true. Now I see this site doesn't even load in IE11, even though it says WebGL is enabled. Works here with 2.33.1 and IE11. Might be an issue with your video? -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
