Re: Adobe Flash Settings page hangs in Seamonkey 2.35

Cruz, Jaime wrote: Jonathan N. Little wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: On 09/15/2015 10:17 AM, WaltS48 wrote: Hardware extraction layer? I've been using Hulu (not Hulu Plus) on Linux for years, and don't recall installing anything. Maybe your distro included it by default? Latest versions of

Re: Adobe Flash Settings page hangs in Seamonkey 2.35

On 09/15/2015 08:15 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: On 09/15/2015 10:17 AM, WaltS48 wrote: Hardware extraction layer? I've been using Hulu (not Hulu Plus) on Linux for years, and don't recall installing anything. Maybe your distro included it by default? Latest versions of Ubuntu and Mint did not,

Re: Adobe Flash Settings page hangs in Seamonkey 2.35

Jonathan N. Little wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: On 09/15/2015 10:17 AM, WaltS48 wrote: Hardware extraction layer? I've been using Hulu (not Hulu Plus) on Linux for years, and don't recall installing anything. Maybe your distro included it by default? Latest versions of Ubuntu and Mint did

Re: Cache in 2.35?

Ray_Net wrote: A Williams wrote on 14/09/2015 18:21: Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote on 11/09/2015 20:32: On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is it back to using just the cache folder? I also have a cache.trash4895 folder

Re: Adobe Flash Settings page hangs in Seamonkey 2.35

Cruz, Jaime wrote: On 09/15/2015 10:17 AM, WaltS48 wrote: Hardware extraction layer? I've been using Hulu (not Hulu Plus) on Linux for years, and don't recall installing anything. Maybe your distro included it by default? Latest versions of Ubuntu and Mint did not, so I had to install it

Re: Fw: Bug on V.2.35

Paul Bergsagel wrote: Franky Tahiti wrote: - Forwarded Message - From: Franky Tahiti To: "support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org" Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 11:38 AM Subject: Bug on V.2.35 Hello from

Lots of huge stuff on Apple's web pages?

Hello. For an example, https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201222 shows HUGE font sizes in my SeaMonkey v2.35 in both of my old, Windows XP Pro SP3, and 64-bit Debian (oldstable)/Linux (using SM contrib files). :( Thank you in advance. :) -- "Is it for pleasure you were made? Not for doing,

Re: Lots of huge stuff on Apple's web pages?

Ant wrote: Hello. For an example, https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201222 shows HUGE font sizes in my SeaMonkey v2.35 in both of my old, Windows XP Pro SP3, and 64-bit Debian (oldstable)/Linux (using SM contrib files). :( Thank you in advance. :) I see no text on that page at all. There is

Re: Cache in 2.35?

A Williams wrote on 16/09/2015 17:39: Ray_Net wrote: A Williams wrote on 14/09/2015 18:21: Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote on 11/09/2015 20:32: On 10/09/2015 18:27, Tom Pamin wrote: Is cache once again handled differently in 2.35? Instaed of cache2, is it back to using just the cache

Re: Lots of huge stuff on Apple's web pages?

On 9/16/2015 12:03 PM, Ant wrote: > Hello. > > For an example, https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201222 shows HUGE font > sizes in my SeaMonkey v2.35 in both of my old, Windows XP Pro SP3, and > 64-bit Debian (oldstable)/Linux (using SM contrib files). :( > > Thank you in advance. :) > I see

Re: Fw: Bug on V.2.35

EE wrote: If you are able to get the bottom end of the window to appear, the lower right corner is what you drag (horizontally and/or vertically) to resize the window. Actually, you can drag and drop any edge or corner of the window. The benefit of using a corner is that you can control both

Re: Lots of huge stuff on Apple's web pages? Found its cause...

On 17.09.2015 05:10, Ant wrote: Minimum font size Hello, good shot! I created "Bug 1205534 - default property font.minimum-size.x-western=10 causes much too big font size on particular web page" Regards Rainer

Re: Lots of huge stuff on Apple's web pages? Found its cause...

For an example, https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201222 shows HUGE font sizes in my SeaMonkey v2.35 in both of my old, Windows XP Pro SP3, and 64-bit Debian (oldstable)/Linux (using SM contrib files). :( Thank you in advance. :) From mozilla.support.firefox newsgroup since I was able to