Re: Huge caches with many Cache.Trash left overs.

2016-03-25 Thread David E. Ross
On 3/25/2016 1:38 PM, Lee wrote: > On 3/25/16, David E. Ross wrote: >> On 3/25/2016 1:43 AM, Daniel wrote: >>> On 25/03/2016 3:44 AM, Lee wrote: On 3/24/16, Daniel wrote: > On 24/03/2016 9:07 AM, Ant wrote: >> Wow. >> >> I

Re: Huge caches with many Cache.Trash left overs.

2016-03-25 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne
Lee wrote: On 3/25/16, David E. Ross wrote: On 3/25/2016 1:43 AM, Daniel wrote: On 25/03/2016 3:44 AM, Lee wrote: On 3/24/16, Daniel wrote: On 24/03/2016 9:07 AM, Ant wrote: Wow. I just noticed my Windows XP Pro SP3's C:\Documents and

Re: Planning to install a long overdue Seamonkey update

2016-03-25 Thread WaltS48
On 03/25/2016 02:22 PM, no...@nonospam.org wrote: This makes me wonder if I should update to v2.39 instead of v2.40. Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote: Also read https://blog.mozilla.org/meeting-notes/archives/2340. Old meeting. Most recent meeting.

Re: Planning to install a long overdue Seamonkey update

2016-03-25 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne
What makes you think that? If it's the part about "SeaMonkey 2.40 final is in limbo", bear in mind those notes are from 1st March - over 3 weeks ago. The release of SeaMonkey 2.40 was announced about 2 weeks later, on 14th March. Mark. notme wrote: This makes me wonder if I should update

Re: Huge caches with many Cache.Trash left overs.

2016-03-25 Thread Lee
On 3/25/16, David E. Ross wrote: > On 3/25/2016 1:43 AM, Daniel wrote: >> On 25/03/2016 3:44 AM, Lee wrote: >>> On 3/24/16, Daniel wrote: On 24/03/2016 9:07 AM, Ant wrote: > Wow. > > I just noticed my Windows XP Pro SP3's

Re: Planning to install a long overdue Seamonkey update

2016-03-25 Thread notme
This makes me wonder if I should update to v2.39 instead of v2.40. Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote: Also read https://blog.mozilla.org/meeting-notes/archives/2340. -- Q: What's the quickest way to get a mailbox full of spam? A: Post a message in any newsgroup using a real email address.

Re: Planning to install a long overdue Seamonkey update

2016-03-25 Thread EE
no...@nonospam.org wrote: I am still using SeaMonkey v2.22.1. I had updated to a later version quite awhile back but had problems which led me to go back to v2.22.1. I have now decided that I really need to update as there are websites that don't work properly with this version which was

Re: Huge caches with many Cache.Trash left overs.

2016-03-25 Thread David E. Ross
On 3/25/2016 1:43 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 25/03/2016 3:44 AM, Lee wrote: >> On 3/24/16, Daniel wrote: >>> On 24/03/2016 9:07 AM, Ant wrote: Wow. I just noticed my Windows XP Pro SP3's C:\Documents and Settings\Ant\Application

Re: Another Sync Idea ...

2016-03-25 Thread Bill Spikowski
Rainer Bielefeld wrote: On 21.03.2016 21:42, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: has somebody already tested this idea? Hello, here a test report for an

Re: Another Sync Idea ...

2016-03-25 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
On 21.03.2016 21:42, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: has somebody already tested this idea? Hello, here a test report for an alternative to that

Re: Huge caches with many Cache.Trash left overs.

2016-03-25 Thread Daniel
On 25/03/2016 3:44 AM, Lee wrote: On 3/24/16, Daniel wrote: On 24/03/2016 9:07 AM, Ant wrote: Wow. I just noticed my Windows XP Pro SP3's C:\Documents and Settings\Ant\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\0348axza3.sm2.10.1andNewer\Cache\ was over 8 GB! It

Re: Planning to install a long overdue Seamonkey update

2016-03-25 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
On 24.03.2016 21:49, no...@nonospam.org wrote: With all the updates that have come out between 2.22.1 and 2.40, I'm wondering if there are any potential problems I might encounter Hello, be aware that you might get problems with one of these new problems what