Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Richmond wrote:
If I visit this page:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
page. However if I visit it with a text
Richmond wrote:
If I visit this page:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
page. However if I visit it with a text browser, e.g. w3m or lynx, I
On 1/30/2017 3:12 PM, Ant wrote:
> On 1/29/2017 8:01 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 1/29/2017 7:20 AM, Ant wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I just noticed
>>> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nosquint-plus/, but no
>>> SeaMonkey/SM support like
>>>
Maybee he's saying Altaba?
WaltS48 escribió:
> On 01/30/2017 03:56 PM, p...@wasatchrental.com wrote:
>> Since aabaco took over yahoo. seamonkey email app will no longer
>> download from my domain email account. Because I don't use internet
>> explorer, Seamonkey is greek to aabaco tech support
Mason83 writes:
> On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote:
>> If I visit this page:
>>
>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
>>
>> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a
Mason83 writes:
> On 31/01/2017 00:14, WaltS48 wrote:
>> On 01/30/2017 05:46 PM, Richmond wrote:
>>> If I visit this page:
>>>
>>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
>>>
>>> with Seamonkey
TCW wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:31:23 -0800, Pat Connors
> wrote:
>
>> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
>> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
>> am using? Is there a good reason why I should
On 31/01/2017 00:14, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 01/30/2017 05:46 PM, Richmond wrote:
>> If I visit this page:
>>
>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
>>
>> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a
On 1/29/2017 8:01 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/29/2017 7:20 AM, Ant wrote:
Hello.
I just noticed
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nosquint-plus/, but no
SeaMonkey/SM support like
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/nosquint-plus/. :( Has
anyone gotten it to work in
On 01/30/2017 05:46 PM, Richmond wrote:
If I visit this page:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
page. However if I visit it with a text
On 31/01/2017 00:05, Mason83 wrote:
> On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote:
>> If I visit this page:
>>
>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
>>
>> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote:
> If I visit this page:
>
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
>
> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
> page. However if I visit it with a
If I visit this page:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
page. However if I visit it with a text browser, e.g. w3m or lynx, I can
read the
On 01/30/2017 04:15 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/29/2017 08:34 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/25/2017 08:21 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
I've just changed laptops. The CRITICAL difference is the change
FROM a 4:3 aspect ratio TO 16:9.
I can properly display web sites if I *set ZOOM to 130%.
I
On 01/30/2017 03:56 PM, p...@wasatchrental.com wrote:
Since aabaco took over yahoo. seamonkey email app will no longer download from
my domain email account. Because I don't use internet explorer, Seamonkey is
greek to aabaco tech support can not help
(Pat)
I thought Verizon was buying
On 01/30/2017 09:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote:
> Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit. While I am asking questions,
> does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in
> this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version.
>
>> change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit.
>
>
On 01/29/2017 08:34 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/25/2017 08:21 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
I've just changed laptops. The CRITICAL difference is the change
FROM a 4:3 aspect ratio TO 16:9.
I can properly display web sites if I *set ZOOM to 130%.
I can find settings for min and max zoom in
Since aabaco took over yahoo. seamonkey email app will no longer download from
my domain email account. Because I don't use internet explorer, Seamonkey is
greek to aabaco tech support can not help
(Pat)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On 01/30/2017 02:06 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
On 30/01/2017, WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:
I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
am using?
Mostly boring stuff under the hood compared to the jump from 2.40 to 2.46.
Ratty fixed the default search engine setting which caused so much noise.
You can generate and up to date list of fixes for SeaMonkey in the status
meeting notes:
Pat Connors wrote:
I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
problems with my 2.47?
Who said you had to switch? 2.46 is the
On 1/30/2017 11:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote:
Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit. While I am asking questions,
does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in
this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version.
change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit.
It's basically Firefox
Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit. While I am asking questions,
does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in
this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version.
change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit.
--
Pat Connors
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
On 1/30/2017 10:25 AM, Pat Connors wrote:
I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47
I am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
problems with my 2.47?
I think you
My 2.48 came as an automatic update to the 2.47 I was using.
I've noticed one bug so far: the default button (usually "OK") on most
dialogs is active and functional, but _visually_ "greyed out", with the
legend just barely visible. -JW
___
I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47
I am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
problems with my 2.47?
I think you should be certain where your browser came from.
On 01/30/2017 02:06 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
On 30/01/2017, WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:
I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
am using?
On 1/30/17, me wrote:
> Pat Connors wrote:
>> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
>> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
>> am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
>> problems with
Pat Connors wrote:
> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
> am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
> problems with my 2.47?
>
I think you should be certain
29 matches
Mail list logo