Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

2017-01-30 Thread Paul in Houston, TX
Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Richmond wrote: If I visit this page: http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank page. However if I visit it with a text

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

2017-01-30 Thread Paul in Houston, TX
Richmond wrote: If I visit this page: http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank page. However if I visit it with a text browser, e.g. w3m or lynx, I

Re: NoSquint Plus extension.

2017-01-30 Thread NoOp
On 1/30/2017 3:12 PM, Ant wrote: > On 1/29/2017 8:01 AM, David E. Ross wrote: >> On 1/29/2017 7:20 AM, Ant wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> I just noticed >>> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nosquint-plus/, but no >>> SeaMonkey/SM support like >>>

Re: emails will no longer download

2017-01-30 Thread Luis Carlos González Moráles
Maybee he's saying Altaba? WaltS48 escribió: > On 01/30/2017 03:56 PM, p...@wasatchrental.com wrote: >> Since aabaco took over yahoo. seamonkey email app will no longer >> download from my domain email account. Because I don't use internet >> explorer, Seamonkey is greek to aabaco tech support

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

2017-01-30 Thread Richmond
Mason83 writes: > On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote: >> If I visit this page: >> >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ >> >> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

2017-01-30 Thread Richmond
Mason83 writes: > On 31/01/2017 00:14, WaltS48 wrote: >> On 01/30/2017 05:46 PM, Richmond wrote: >>> If I visit this page: >>> >>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ >>> >>> with Seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread Arnie Goetchius
TCW wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:31:23 -0800, Pat Connors > wrote: > >> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is >> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I >> am using? Is there a good reason why I should

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

2017-01-30 Thread Mason83
On 31/01/2017 00:14, WaltS48 wrote: > On 01/30/2017 05:46 PM, Richmond wrote: >> If I visit this page: >> >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ >> >> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a

Re: NoSquint Plus extension.

2017-01-30 Thread Ant
On 1/29/2017 8:01 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/29/2017 7:20 AM, Ant wrote: Hello. I just noticed https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nosquint-plus/, but no SeaMonkey/SM support like https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/nosquint-plus/. :( Has anyone gotten it to work in

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

2017-01-30 Thread WaltS48
On 01/30/2017 05:46 PM, Richmond wrote: If I visit this page: http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank page. However if I visit it with a text

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

2017-01-30 Thread Mason83
On 31/01/2017 00:05, Mason83 wrote: > On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote: >> If I visit this page: >> >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ >> >> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank

Re: Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

2017-01-30 Thread Mason83
On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote: > If I visit this page: > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ > > with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank > page. However if I visit it with a

Forbes Displays Blank Without Javascript

2017-01-30 Thread Richmond
If I visit this page: http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/ with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank page. However if I visit it with a text browser, e.g. w3m or lynx, I can read the

Re: SOLVED!!! - was [Re: Additional details - was [How to set DEFAULT zoom level]]

2017-01-30 Thread WaltS48
On 01/30/2017 04:15 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 01/29/2017 08:34 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 01/25/2017 08:21 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: I've just changed laptops. The CRITICAL difference is the change FROM a 4:3 aspect ratio TO 16:9. I can properly display web sites if I *set ZOOM to 130%. I

Re: emails will no longer download

2017-01-30 Thread WaltS48
On 01/30/2017 03:56 PM, p...@wasatchrental.com wrote: Since aabaco took over yahoo. seamonkey email app will no longer download from my domain email account. Because I don't use internet explorer, Seamonkey is greek to aabaco tech support can not help (Pat) I thought Verizon was buying

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread NoOp
On 01/30/2017 09:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote: > Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit. While I am asking questions, > does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in > this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version. > >> change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit. > >

SOLVED!!! - was [Re: Additional details - was [How to set DEFAULT zoom level]]

2017-01-30 Thread Richard Owlett
On 01/29/2017 08:34 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 01/25/2017 08:21 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: I've just changed laptops. The CRITICAL difference is the change FROM a 4:3 aspect ratio TO 16:9. I can properly display web sites if I *set ZOOM to 130%. I can find settings for min and max zoom in

emails will no longer download

2017-01-30 Thread pat
Since aabaco took over yahoo. seamonkey email app will no longer download from my domain email account. Because I don't use internet explorer, Seamonkey is greek to aabaco  tech support can not help (Pat) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread WaltS48
On 01/30/2017 02:06 AM, Bret Busby wrote: On 30/01/2017, WaltS48 wrote: On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote: I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I am using?

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Mostly boring stuff under the hood compared to the jump from 2.40 to 2.46. Ratty fixed the default search engine setting which caused so much noise. You can generate and up to date list of fixes for SeaMonkey in the status meeting notes:

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread EE
Pat Connors wrote: I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no problems with my 2.47? Who said you had to switch? 2.46 is the

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread TCW
On 1/30/2017 11:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote: Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit. While I am asking questions, does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version. change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit. It's basically Firefox

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread Pat Connors
Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit. While I am asking questions, does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version. change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit. -- Pat Connors http://www.connorsgenealogy.com

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread TCW
On 1/30/2017 10:25 AM, Pat Connors wrote: I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no problems with my 2.47? I think you

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread J. Weaver Jr.
My 2.48 came as an automatic update to the 2.47 I was using. I've noticed one bug so far: the default button (usually "OK") on most dialogs is active and functional, but _visually_ "greyed out", with the legend just barely visible. -JW ___

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread Pat Connors
I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no problems with my 2.47? I think you should be certain where your browser came from.

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread WaltS48
On 01/30/2017 02:06 AM, Bret Busby wrote: On 30/01/2017, WaltS48 wrote: On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote: I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I am using?

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread Lee
On 1/30/17, me wrote: > Pat Connors wrote: >> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is >> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I >> am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no >> problems with

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-01-30 Thread me
Pat Connors wrote: > I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is > not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I > am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no > problems with my 2.47? > I think you should be certain