On 6/21/17 at 4:43 PM, rickman's prodigious digits fired off with great
aplomb:
rickman wrote on 6/1/2017 8:59 PM:
Dirk Munk wrote on 6/1/2017 6:43 PM:
rickman wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 6/1/2017 2:08 PM:
rickman wrote:
I don't know if I can continue to use SeaMonkey. I've been
responding
I may have mentioned this before, but I can't find it so I'm starting a new
thread.
There are times I have a number of reminders alerting at the same time,
usually because I am putting some of them off until I do them all together
like paying bills for example. If there are more than four
rickman wrote on 6/1/2017 8:59 PM:
Dirk Munk wrote on 6/1/2017 6:43 PM:
rickman wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 6/1/2017 2:08 PM:
rickman wrote:
I don't know if I can continue to use SeaMonkey. I've been responding to
posts in various groups for an hour or two and I've only been able to type
for
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Its not a bug. its a mozilla feature:
I seem to remember another company that called bugs features ..
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=29=3030185
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1344594
Basically the OS settings are no longer
Correction: "... NOTHING in them."
Henrik37 wrote:
Sorry, I misunderstood what you asked me to look for. There were
'sessionstore' files and most where shown as having anything in them.
Should I just delete them all?
Henrik37 wrote:
There is only a single profile listed in the
Sorry, I misunderstood what you asked me to look for. There were
'sessionstore' files and most where shown as having anything in them.
Should I just delete them all?
Henrik37 wrote:
There is only a single profile listed in the profiles list.
Any ideas on what to try next?
Lemuel
The value is set to 'only when I need them' (or something similar) but
it didn't fix the problem.
Does anybody have any further ideas? The problem is driving me crazy.
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:38 AM, Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
I am running SM v.2.46 on
There is only a single profile listed in the profiles list.
Any ideas on what to try next?
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
On 6/15/2017 1:47 PM, Henrik37 wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 15/06/2017 11:47 AM, Henrik37 wrote:
I am running SM v.2.46 on a Dell Optiplex 780 with 64 bit Win7-Pro.
For
the last 8
Value is set to '0' (zero) but that didn't fix the problem.
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
I am running SM v.2.46 on a Dell Optiplex 780 with 64 bit Win7-Pro. For
the last 8 days, every time I bring up SM, it opens with:
"Would you like to restore your session?"
and
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I don't think it's a SM setting.
The Date & Time stamps in Windows explorer are fine, this is a SM
problem.
OK, so you've changed your mind. I'll wait for the experts to respond.
No, I didn't change my mind. It is a SM problem, not a SM setting.
On 6/21/17 at 1:45 AM, Mason83's prodigious digits fired off with great
aplomb:
On 21/06/2017 02:44, WaltS48 wrote:
On 6/20/17 8:32 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Okay, thanks to the volunteers who do Seamonkey.
But will someone PLEASE fix the "Page not found" error whenever SM
updates and reboots?
Probably Adrians unofficial versions. I would only run 2.49.1 from him
now. All others have more or less serious problems.
The known serious ones for 2.52 (and right now 2.53) are here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1345770
FRG
Ray_Net wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 21-06-17 15:48:
Dirk Munk wrote on 21-06-17 15:48:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote:
Yesterday I got a message that I could update tot SM 2.51, and I
did.
So now I'm running 64 bit SM 2.51 Build identifier: 20170619085306 .
I noticed that the date & time presentation doens't folloe the
regional
Its not a bug. its a mozilla feature:
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=29=3030185
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1344594
Basically the OS settings are no longer honored by mozilla applications.
Jorg fixed some of it but there are limits which can be done in the
Dirk Munk wrote:
I don't think it's a SM setting.
The Date & Time stamps in Windows explorer are fine, this is a SM
problem.
OK, so you've changed your mind. I'll wait for the experts to respond.
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote:
Yesterday I got a message that I could update tot SM 2.51, and I
did.
So now I'm running 64 bit SM 2.51 Build identifier: 20170619085306 .
I noticed that the date & time presentation doens't folloe the
regional settings of Windows. I'm running the
Dirk Munk wrote:
Yesterday I got a message that I could update tot SM 2.51, and I
did.
So now I'm running 64 bit SM 2.51 Build identifier: 20170619085306 .
I noticed that the date & time presentation doens't folloe the
regional settings of Windows. I'm running the English version of
Windows
Yesterday I got a message that I could update tot SM 2.51, and I did.
So now I'm running 64 bit SM 2.51 Build identifier: 20170619085306 .
I noticed that the date & time presentation doens't folloe the regional
settings of Windows. I'm running the English version of Windows 10, but
with Dutch
Muslim father fucks his daughter
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Correct. This shouldn't happen with an offcial release. There are
usually no release notes for unofficial versions. If someone wants to
volunteer and write them I am happy to review the bug and check them in :)
FRG
Mason83 wrote:
On 21/06/2017 02:44, WaltS48 wrote:
On 6/20/17 8:32 PM, Ed
20 matches
Mail list logo
