On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
> Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>> 2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
>> 2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the next 2-3 weeks and will be based
>> on 52.6
>>
>> Firefox does not show minor version numbers in its UA string.
>>
>> 52.5.3 ESR:
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the next 2-3 weeks and will be based
on 52.6
Firefox does not show minor version numbers in its UA string.
52.5.3 ESR:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/52.0
Hello,
Does anybody know any bookmarks privacy/encryption add-on for Seamonkey ?
The two most known ones (Private Bookmarks and Link Passwords) are compatible
with Firefox only.
Tried to convert them to SeaMonkey using the Seamonkey Extension Converter
webpage
but the conversion fails
Cecil Bankston wrote:
My usual POP access to my G-Mail was blocked this AM, with a message
referring me to the following explanation:
If an app or device doesn’t meet our security standards, Google will
block anyone who tries to sign in from that app or device. Because
these apps and devices
On 1/24/2018 1:10 PM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
TCW wrote:
On 1/24/2018 11:01 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
My usual POP access to my G-Mail was blocked this AM, with a message
referring me to the following explanation:
If an app or device doesn’t meet our security standards, Google will
block
Cecil Bankston wrote on 24-01-18 20:10:
TCW wrote:
On 1/24/2018 11:01 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
My usual POP access to my G-Mail was blocked this AM, with a message
referring me to the following explanation:
If an app or device doesn’t meet our security standards, Google
will block anyone
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>
> Firefox does not show minor version numbers in its UA string.
>
> 52.5.3 ESR:
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
> Firefox/52.0
>
> 2.49.2 x 64 local build:
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>
TCW wrote:
On 1/24/2018 11:01 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
My usual POP access to my G-Mail was blocked this AM, with a message
referring me to the following explanation:
If an app or device doesn’t meet our security standards, Google will
block anyone who tries to sign in from that app or
2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the next 2-3 weeks and will be based on 52.6
Firefox does not show minor version numbers in its UA string.
52.5.3 ESR:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
2.49.2 x 64 local build:
What exactly is Google considering insecure about Mozilla-based mail clients?
Probably everything which isn't google and bypasses spying/advertizing or
doesn't use its proprietary sign-in apis :)
FRG
TCW wrote:
What exactly is Google considering insecure about Mozilla-based mail clients?
On 1/24/2018 11:01 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
My usual POP access to my G-Mail was blocked this AM, with a message
referring me to the following explanation:
If an app or device doesn’t meet our security standards, Google will
block anyone who tries to sign in from that app or device. Because
On 1/24/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/24/2018 5:35 AM, Richmond wrote:
cat comm-esr52/mozilla/browser/config/version.txt
52.6.0
Wouldn't it be a good idea to make this version number appear in the
User Agent string? It is currently showing Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.2
(i.e. in Help
My usual POP access to my G-Mail was blocked this AM, with a message
referring me to the following explanation:
If an app or device doesn’t meet our security standards, Google will block
anyone who tries to sign in from that app or device. Because these apps and
devices are easier to break
On 1/24/2018 5:35 AM, Richmond wrote:
> cat comm-esr52/mozilla/browser/config/version.txt
> 52.6.0
>
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to make this version number appear in the
> User Agent string? It is currently showing Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.2
> (i.e. in Help -> About).
>
> I am thinking that
14 matches
Mail list logo
