Re: No-Squint replacement

2017-03-03 Thread Isaac Schemm

Roger Fink wrote:

In the past I've used the No-Squint extension to control the font size
on websites. This includes remembering the setting for future visits.
This no longer works, including using an updated version modified with
the compatibility tool (also, the extension is no longer maintained).

The successor to this extension is No-Squint Plus, but it isn't
compatible with SeaMonkey. I got it to install using the compatibility
tool, but it doesn't do anything at all.

Is there another extension that can do this?


Someone got it working with 2.33.1 but I don't know if it still works 
with 2.46.


http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40=2955773
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: NYT article not loading, similar Google problem

2017-02-10 Thread Isaac Schemm

Richmond wrote:

WaltS48 wrote:

flyguy wrote:

This article does not load into Seamonkey, using my normal profile:

https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1942/02/15/85516308.html?pageNumber=166_u=64767442


Other than that link, I have no problems with the New York Times. The
link does load into a clean profile, and also in Chrome and IE 11.

Perhaps this related to a Google problem that began in the last couple
of months. For example, if I type in "pizza" (no quote marks), I get the
usual ad links, a small map showing pizza places in the area, under
which is a list of those places. Clicking on a pizza place in the list
takes me to another tab, which remains blank with status line showing
"done". I used get what I still get in IE and Chrome: the list of
places, and a full map overlaid with box showing the details of the
place I clicked on.

I can get the usual full map, etc, if I click on the "Maps" link the
menu that's under the Google search box at the top.

Any ideas?

I get a blank tab in SeaMonkey, a log-in page in Firefox.

I am using 2.50 so maybe there is a bug in 2.46 and earlier firefoxes
which will be fixed.


The page showed up for me just fine in 2.48 (I'm logged into my own NY 
Times account.) So maybe it is a bug that got fixed.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google Accounts and Seamonkey

2017-02-09 Thread Isaac Schemm

Bill Spikowski wrote:

Several family members use each of our household and office computers.
We all have our own Google Accounts, but we share some of those
accounts. For instance, we rely on Google Keep to shopping lists and
to-do lists, but Keep works much better if we all use a single Google
Account rather than sharing Keep notes with different accounts.

Here’s my Seamonkey question. When accessing a Google website, it’s
pretty obvious which Google Account we’re signed in on, and switching
accounts is pretty easy. But many other websites seem aware of what
Google Account was used most recently on that computer but don’t display
that information or allow users to change accounts. For instance, a
‘save to calendar’ button or a ‘save this location’ button will add an
event to Google Calendar or a location to Google Maps, but the user
can’t tell which Google Account is receiving this information, or how to
direct it to a different account. I regularly save important events to
the wrong calendar or the wrong map, not realizing what happened until
I’m out and around and need the information on my phone and can’t find
where it got stored.

I open and close Seamonkey browser windows all day, but maybe because I
have a single Seamonkey email window open all day, Seamonkey remembers
which Google Account was used most recently, even a day or two earlier.

My problem may be worse because I regularly keep a Google Chrome browser
window open. I despise the Chrome interface, but there are quire a few
websites that just won’t display properly in Seamonkey, or won’t open at
all (financial sites are the biggest offenders). In Chrome, it’s a
little easier to tell which Google Account is being used, but I can’t
tell how or if Chrome and Seamonkey interact as to Google Accounts.

I’ve searched many Google support sites and forums to figure out how
Google Accounts interact with web browsers, but haven’t been able to
find any explanations that shed light on my situation!


I don't think Chrome and SeaMonkey would interact at all in this regard. 
If you're logged into a website in one browser, it won't affect a 
different browser.


I think Firefox and IE would probably do the same thing as SeaMonkey in 
this case. Chrome has a facility for logging into a Google account from 
the browser itself, because Google makes it - other browsers don't have 
that, as far as I know. So maybe it would be easier to ask for help 
elsewhere, since it doesn't sound like a SeaMonkey-only problem.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Sea Monkey Won't Start--2nd Update

2017-02-08 Thread Isaac Schemm

Larry S. wrote:

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

Which Antivirus is she running?

Microsoft just rolled out the anniversary update to users of Windows
TH2. Had to block it in the vm because this version is just so much
garbage. If this qot installed it might have damaged or disabled
SeaMonkey but this is a full Windows install and you or she should have
noticed.

FRG

Larry S. wrote:


My wife has SM 2.46 on a Dell laptop using Windows 10. Yesterday it
worked just fine. Today it won't start. No mail, no browser, nothing.
Her other programs work perfectly.

She has restarted the computer at least three times. She checked on
task manager--one time it showed, and she stopped it (although it
still wouldn't start). She tried to start it from the list of
programs; no luck.

Any suggestions or ideas? We'd be very appreciative.

Larry S.



Unusual observation--all (every one) of the programs and services in
Task Manger are running. Maybe I'm obsolete, but I'm used to many
running but some not. Is this odd? A clue?


I'm on Windows 10 and the task manager only shows programs that are 
running. Not sure if it's changed since Windows 7 in that regard.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: HowTo: show web page contents in Sidebar

2017-02-06 Thread Isaac Schemm

Rainer Bielefeld wrote:

Hello,

did you ever think about showing web site contents in a SeaMonkey
sidebar panel?

Information how that can be done (it's simple) and for what that can be
useful you find in the unofficial SeaMonkey blog at
.

Additional ideas and comments appreciated.

CU

Rainer Bielefeld
(SeaMonkey QA volunteer)


Thanks for the write up!

I always called them panels too (the source code repo is actually 
https://github.com/IsaacSchemm/sidebar-add-custom-panel) - but the 
English translation of SeaMonkey calls them tabs. That must have been 
why I went with Tab in my add-on.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 10.50a2

2017-02-03 Thread Isaac Schemm

Luis wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Luis wrote on 03-02-17 14:26:

Just installed and so far everything goes smooth. However, since SM
looks so ancient I wonder when will be modernized or at least its
user interface revamped.

I think that the official release version of SeaMonkey is 2.46. year 2017
Your SM version 10.50 is of year 3028 ?



Have you ever heard of Nightly Builds? No, you don't.  Google it.
My newsgroup client is telling be you're running SeaMonkey 2.50a2, not 
10.50a2. There might be a typo somewhere.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 10.50a2

2017-02-03 Thread Isaac Schemm

Luis wrote:

Isaac Schemm wrote:

Luis wrote:

Just installed and so far everything goes smooth. However, since SM
looks so ancient I wonder when will be modernized or at least its user
interface revamped.

There are different themes and extensions you can get.

Sea Fox might be nice if you like the Firefox 3.x look:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/

Under the hood SeaMonkey shares a lot of code with Firefox and
Thunderbird, so you could use those if you feel more comfortable with
how they look & operate.


Actually I'm thinking in something like eM client or MailBird.

Check these out:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/seamonkey/complete-themes/?sort=updated

Also you can customize the toolbars by right-clicking on an empty 
section. You can choose icons, text, or both, and put the text under the 
icons or to the right.


If you don't find what you're looking for, SeaMonkey probably won't be 
able to fit your needs, unfortunately.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 10.50a2

2017-02-03 Thread Isaac Schemm

Luis wrote:

Just installed and so far everything goes smooth. However, since SM
looks so ancient I wonder when will be modernized or at least its user
interface revamped.

There are different themes and extensions you can get.

Sea Fox might be nice if you like the Firefox 3.x look: 
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/


Under the hood SeaMonkey shares a lot of code with Firefox and 
Thunderbird, so you could use those if you feel more comfortable with 
how they look & operate.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: NoSquint Plus extension.

2017-02-02 Thread Isaac Schemm

mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:

NoOp wrote:

On 1/31/2017 9:13 PM, Ant wrote:

On 1/30/2017 5:21 PM, NoOp wrote:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/
Click on the "Check if SeaMonkey version is available" button.


Weird. I don't see a "Check if SeaMonkey version is available"
button.



Check here:



I can't speak for Ant, but that's not what I see using SeaMonkey 2.46 on
Windows. The green button you've circled says "Only with Firefox - Get
Firefox Now!" and, as its title suggests, leads to a page to download
Firefox.

I see the same regardless of whether or not "Advertise Firefox
compatibility" is enabled. Do you perhaps have a customised user-agent
string, or an extension modifying how AMO appears?



I believe it's this extension:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/amo-browsing-for-seamonkey/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: ADB Helper & Valence extensions incompatible with SM v2.46?

2017-01-20 Thread Isaac Schemm

I just saw this post now, so I thought I'd reply.

Valence and ADB Helper both work perfectly for me in SeaMonkey (I'm 
using 2.47) once I edit the install.rdf in the .xpi, so I've submitted a 
couple patches to have SeaMonkey listed in the install.rdf. The ADB 
Helper patch has been accepted already and the Valence one probably will 
be too.


That being said, I might be the only person who's tried to actually use 
them in SeaMonkey - mostly out of curiosity :)


Ant wrote:

Thanks.


On 1/11/2017 11:37 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

SeaMonkey does not ship them. Might come from the Firefox Devtools
shipped with SeaMonkey. They are supposed to be installed in the WebIDE.
Test with 2.48 indicated they are not installed in the background when
you open it but this might have changed in 2.47 or 2.48. Just let them
stay disabled or remove them. They will not work anyway.

FRG


Ant wrote:

Hello.

I just noticed these two disabled extensions in my installed SM v2.46.
Did they come from v2.46? If so, then why are they disabled?

Thank you in advance. :)







___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey specific site problem

2016-05-16 Thread Isaac Schemm

Ken Rudolph wrote:

I'm running Win-7, SeaMonkey 2.40.

I am having trouble with a site written especially to handle voting for
a film festival.  The site works perfectly in Chrome and I.E.  It
doesn't work with SeaMonkey (and it also didn't work in the identical
way with Firefox 43.0.1).  The browser strips out film titles and other
important information on the site pages.

I had trouble upgrading Firefox 43.0.1, since I knew there was a later
version (the system froze during the update twice and never completed
it).  So I un-installed FF and re-installed a fresh version (46.0.1).
After that the site in question ran perfectly, exactly the way it does
in Chrome and I.E.  But it still wouldn't run correctly in SeaMonkey.

The site is https://notsiff.net/siff2016/siff.html .  However one has to
make a login and password to actually access the site, and the site is
made for a small group of users for a specific purpose.  But even on the
log-in page using other browsers there are links opposite the icons that
don't appear using SeaMonkey (and didn't appear using FF 43.0.

I guess my question is this:  My SeaMonkey info says:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40

And as I indicated Firefox 43.0.1 didn't display the site correctly.  I
was wondering if there is a version of SeaMonkey that utilizes the
Firefox/46.0 engine. Maybe then the page would also work correctly in
SeaMonkey.

I'm not sure if this is a reportable bug, or if my SeaMonkey just hasn't
updated to the latest browser version?  Or what?

Thanks for this site and all the help I've gotten here over the years
since Netscape 0.8.

The SeaMonkey version goes up by .01 each Firefox version, so SeaMonkey 
2.42 = Firefox 45 and SeaMonkey 2.43 = Firefox 46.


You can find some unofficial, pre-release builds at 
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly 
- just note that these are unsupported and may have unknown problems. 
(comm-release = 2.43 right now.)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

2016-05-06 Thread Isaac Schemm

WaltS48 wrote:

On 05/06/2016 01:54 AM, Daniel wrote:

On 5/05/2016 11:16 PM, dlemir...@gmail.com wrote:

I'm happy to see it fixed.  I'm among the naggers, and had some fun
with my complaint:


You don't have a relevant issue so I just picked one.

Your obsolete browser message is crappy and infuriating. I'm running
*Google Chrome* on a *Chromebook*, which is about as modern as you
can get, and the browser update page you link to tells me that *I*
need to update my browser. What nonsense. Meanwhile, users of
Seamonkey, which is a perfectly modern browser, based on the same
rendering engine as Firefox, get a study and annoying message that
their browser isn't supported, which far too many users read as "you
stupid obsolescent geezer, why don't you get with the 21st Century?".

Great public relations there on Weather.com's part.

Seamonkey works fine with Google Apps, which is a very modern heavily
scripted, fully interactive site, so what's so &$^&*(&)%^ special
about your "new" Weather.com that you have to make an issue of the
browser. Maybe *you* need to join the 21st Century and realize that
the browser wars are supposed to be over. And learn to process User
Agent strings properly so you can recognize a modern browser when you
see one.


I'm just glad it's fixed.  I think NetFlix is my next target.


Rather than telling them to sniff for SeaMonkey, why not have them
sniff for the "gecko" process  that way they'll fix their website
for several browsers!!

You could do worse than send them to http://geckoisgecko.org/ 
might be old, but the relevant information probably still applies!



In every browser I have installed, the UA String starts out with
Mozilla/5.0. For browser sniffing it seems that would be good enough.

The proper way is to feature sniff, which is what they might have been
doing, and SeaMonkey didn't cut the mustard on being up to date on
enabled features. 

Except for IE and Edge, I have Brave 0.9.0, Chromium 49.0.2623.108,
Firefox(release, beta, nightly), Opera 37.0.2178.32, SeaMonkey 2.46a1
(nightly), and Vivaldi 1.1.453.52 installed on my system.

SeaMonkey 2.46a1 did not get the nag at weather.com. My test of 2.40
did. Is it because SeaMonkey 2.46a1 based on Gecko 49 was feature
enabled for what weather.com was offering. 

Happy camper that SM 2.40 users are now in the happy camper camp.



weather.com wasn't happy with Firefox 43 either at the time. I think it 
was ignoring SeaMonkey and just looking at the "Firefox/" part of the 
user agent string.


IIRC, when IE 11 came out, there were problems where it was detected as 
Firefox 11 (old version) because it has "like Gecko" in the UA string.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: refreshing seamonkey after upgrading to 2.40

2016-04-26 Thread Isaac Schemm

n.s.go...@gmail.com wrote:

Just Finished un-tarring  tar -xvf seamonkey-2.40.tar went well  went into /SeaMonkey 
< running in Linux >  typed seamonkey  so, seamonkey came up I am already 
running 2.12 upgraded to 2.40

Checked in about Seamonkey and it shows I am still running in 2.12 while in the 
2.40 dir. how do I refresh this to reflect 2.40 upgrade?

thanks


Nick

"seamonkey" probably launches the version installed on /usr/bin, 
/usr/local/bin or something like that. Try running "./seamonkey" instead.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Open Other Browser

2016-04-05 Thread Isaac Schemm

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

OG wrote:


While in SeaMonkey for newsgroups (mail) I click on a posted link and
SeaMonkey opens its web browser.
Unfortunately SeaMonkey cannot handle the web page.

So how do I tell SeaMonkey Mail to open say FireFox as the defaut?


If it's just an occasional problem with a poorly coded page, simply copy
the URL from the location bar, launch Firefox, and paste it into the
location bar there.

If you want to make Firefox your default browser, sorry, I don't know
how to do that. AFAIK SM will always launch its own browser if SM is
open, even if the operating system knows to launch a different browser
when you open a URL.

This extension looks like it'll let you choose which browser your email 
links open in:


https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/seamonkey/addon/standalone-seamonkey-mail/?src=userprofile
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey 2.40 on Mac OS 10.6 browser windows have no menu bar, uncontrollable

2016-03-19 Thread Isaac Schemm

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:

My wife uses SeaMonkey on a MacBook (running 10.6).

Somehow, it got into a state where browser windows fill the whole
screen
and have no menu bar, and thus are essentially uncontrollable (except
for keyboard shortcuts). I don't even see how to change the browser
window settings that are accessed via the menu.

So how do I recover?

(Yes, I assume I could go to the trouble and create a new profile.  I
created a test profile, and it works OK.)



F11 fullscreen mode?



On my wife's Mac, at least, F11 just seems to push the browser window
behind the desktop (somewhat bizarrely), so I have access to the Finder
menu bar and dock.  It doesn't restore the browser window to normal.


Pardon my Mac-ingorance but it sounds like you have your application
window
scaled larger than your desktop resolution. In Linux you can
ALT+Left-click
drag to grab a windows anywhere, not just the non-visible title bar, and
move the window off screen enough to grab a corner or edge to resize it.
Does Mac have something similar? In Windows you have to right-click the
taskbar and click Cascade Windows to fix such a situation.


After trying a number of ways to reduce the size of a too-large window,
I've come to the conclusion that the best description of the situation
is "full screen without menu bar".  The window isn't too large for the
screen, it is fitted to it exactly.  How do I get the menu bar back?
Do you see the menu bar when you move the mouse to the top of the 
screen? Newer versions of OS X hide the menu bar when you maximize a 
window, until you move your mouse up to the top.

If this is the case, you can make it visible by un-maximizing the window.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey 2.40 on Mac OS 10.6 browser windows have no menu bar, uncontrollable

2016-03-19 Thread Isaac Schemm

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:


After trying a number of ways to reduce the size of a too-large window,
I've come to the conclusion that the best description of the situation
is "full screen without menu bar".  The window isn't too large for the
screen, it is fitted to it exactly.  How do I get the menu bar back?


Are your not in fullscreen mode then? F11 toggles the mode.


On this system, F11 hides (but doesn't minimize, they appear to slide
off-screen) any open windows, showing the desktop.  F11 again reverses
this.  This happens whether the window is SeaMonkey or any other
application.

Just checked - looks like the key command to turn full screen on/off on 
OS X is Shift+Command+F. See if that helps.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey 2.35

2015-08-27 Thread Isaac Schemm

Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:

On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:54:52 +0800, Edmund Wong ew...@pw-wspx.org
wrote:


Hi Everyone,

As I mentioned on the blog, I have started spinning up the
release for SeaMonkey 2.35. ('About time!' someone says.)

In the past, I would say on the release bug when the ETA is,
but due to the fact that we are doing this semi-automatically
(Win32 builds and repacks are manually done), and that there
are changes to the infra code, we expect to have some bustages.
This means delay; but considering everyone's been
waiting for it for months on end, a few days of
delay won't make any difference (I hope. :P ).

Again, I really want to thank everyone's patience while
we play catch up.

Edmund


While it looks like the first two build bombed out, I see the third
build has gotten a lot farther. Fingers crossed. So is 2.35 intending
to be based off FF40?

- Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP]

2.35 will be based off of the Firefox 38 (extended support release) 
branch. This is why they chose 2.35 instead of 2.34 or 2.36 as the 
release to focus on - they automatically get Mozilla's ESR security fixes.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey