Dirk Munk wrote:
JAS wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in
Advanced->Cache?
FRG
I am using Seamonkey 2.48 on Windows 7 wit 8gb memory and my browser
freezes all the time, I have
disk-cache set to "let Seamonkey set"
and in
JAS wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in
Advanced->Cache?
FRG
I am using Seamonkey 2.48 on Windows 7 wit 8gb memory and my browser
freezes all the time, I have
disk-cache set to "let Seamonkey set"
and in about:config I have
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in
Advanced->Cache?
FRG
I am using Seamonkey 2.48 on Windows 7 wit 8gb memory and my browser
freezes all the time, I have
disk-cache set to "let Seamonkey set"
and in about:config I have the
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Default for browser.cache.memory.capacity seems to be 20. Never
hand any problems here in countless installations. Is your disk
slooo or an AV interfering?
FRG
No, but I always have many, many tabs open, and disk cache can not
replace memory cache.
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in
Advanced->Cache?
FRG
As far as I'm aware, that's only for the disk cache.
Dirk Munk wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
Default for browser.cache.memory.capacity seems to be 20. Never hand any
problems here in countless installations. Is your disk slooo or an AV
interfering?
FRG
Dirk Munk wrote:
Gabriel wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of
Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in
Advanced->Cache?
FRG
Dirk Munk wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I
experienced some
Gabriel wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 19:13:
Gabriel wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while
ago, I experienced some weird
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 19:13:
Gabriel wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I
experienced some weird problems like
Ray_Net wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 14-02-19 19:13:
Gabriel wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while
ago, I experienced some weird
David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/14/2019 3:22 AM, Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I
experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled,
very sluggish
Dirk Munk wrote on 14-02-19 19:13:
Gabriel wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while
ago, I experienced some weird problems like
On 2/14/2019 3:22 AM, Dirk Munk wrote:
> I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
>
> I'm very happy with them in general.
>
> However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I
> experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled,
> very sluggish responses
Gabriel wrote:
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago,
I experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became
garbled, very
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51:
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I
experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very
sluggish
Dirk Munk wrote:
I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s.
I'm very happy with them in general.
However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago,
I experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became
garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't
16 matches
Mail list logo