Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-15 Thread JAS
Dirk Munk wrote: JAS wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in Advanced->Cache? FRG I am using Seamonkey 2.48 on Windows 7 wit 8gb memory and my browser freezes all the time, I have disk-cache set to "let Seamonkey set" and in

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-15 Thread Dirk Munk
JAS wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in Advanced->Cache? FRG I am using Seamonkey 2.48 on Windows 7 wit 8gb memory and my browser freezes all the time, I have disk-cache set to "let Seamonkey set" and in about:config I have

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-15 Thread JAS
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in Advanced->Cache? FRG I am using Seamonkey 2.48 on Windows 7 wit 8gb memory and my browser freezes all the time, I have disk-cache set to "let Seamonkey set" and in about:config I have the

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-15 Thread Dirk Munk
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Default for browser.cache.memory.capacity seems to be 20. Never hand any problems here in countless installations. Is your disk slooo or an AV interfering? FRG No, but I always have many, many tabs open, and disk cache can not replace memory cache.

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-15 Thread Dirk Munk
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in Advanced->Cache? FRG As far as I'm aware, that's only for the disk cache. Dirk Munk wrote: Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general.

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-15 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Default for browser.cache.memory.capacity seems to be 20. Never hand any problems here in countless installations. Is your disk slooo or an AV interfering? FRG Dirk Munk wrote: Gabriel wrote: Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51: Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-15 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in Advanced->Cache? FRG Dirk Munk wrote: Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I experienced some

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-14 Thread Dirk Munk
Gabriel wrote: Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 19:13: Gabriel wrote: Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51: Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  experienced some weird

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-14 Thread Gabriel
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 19:13: Gabriel wrote: Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51: Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I experienced some weird problems like

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-14 Thread Dirk Munk
Ray_Net wrote: Dirk Munk wrote on 14-02-19 19:13: Gabriel wrote: Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51: Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  experienced some weird

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-14 Thread Dirk Munk
David E. Ross wrote: On 2/14/2019 3:22 AM, Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-14 Thread Ray_Net
Dirk Munk wrote on 14-02-19 19:13: Gabriel wrote: Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51: Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  experienced some weird problems like

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-14 Thread David E. Ross
On 2/14/2019 3:22 AM, Dirk Munk wrote: > I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. > > I'm very happy with them in general. > > However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  > experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, > very sluggish responses

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-14 Thread Dirk Munk
Gabriel wrote: Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51: Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-14 Thread Gabriel
Dirk Munk wrote on 14/02/2019 14:51: Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

2019-02-14 Thread Dirk Munk
Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't