Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-07 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:39:34 -0800, David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid wrote: On 12/5/11 3:28 AM, Ant wrote: Hello. Is there a way to remove the and symbols that surround the URLs with sending links through e-mails (right click on a link on a web page)? I find them annoying. :(

Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-07 Thread David E. Ross
On 12/7/11 12:53 PM, JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:39:34 -0800, David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid wrote: On 12/5/11 3:28 AM, Ant wrote: Hello. Is there a way to remove the and symbols that surround the URLs with sending links through e-mails (right click on a link on a

Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-06 Thread Ant
On 12/5/2011 5:53 AM PT, Jay Garcia typed: Is there a way to remove the and symbols that surround the URLs with sending links through e-mails (right click on a link on a web page)? I find them annoying. :( Thank you in advance. :) No way that I know of to automatically remove those, you

Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-06 Thread Ant
On 12/5/2011 11:10 AM PT, Paul B. Gallagher typed: The user asked how to remove the and so maybe he has a particular reason other than conforming to line length and RFC's, etc. Maybe we should listen to what he has to say first and then we may be able to proceed accordingly, still keeping in

Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-05 Thread Ant
Hello. Is there a way to remove the and symbols that surround the URLs with sending links through e-mails (right click on a link on a web page)? I find them annoying. :( Thank you in advance. :) -- Oh, good morning, my little worker ants! That's just a figure of speech; I would NEVER

Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-05 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Ant wrote: Is there a way to remove the and symbols that surround the URLs with sending links through e-mails (right click on a link on a web page)? I find them annoying. :( Consider not removing them. There is a purpose, and it is to keep the link from wrapping. A long link may end up like

Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-05 Thread Jay Garcia
On 05.12.2011 05:28, Ant wrote: --- Original Message --- Hello. Is there a way to remove the and symbols that surround the URLs with sending links through e-mails (right click on a link on a web page)? I find them annoying. :( Thank you in advance. :) No way that I know of to

Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-05 Thread David E. Ross
On 12/5/11 3:28 AM, Ant wrote: Hello. Is there a way to remove the and symbols that surround the URLs with sending links through e-mails (right click on a link on a web page)? I find them annoying. :( Thank you in advance. :) Some form of bracket is required per RFC 3986. The

Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-05 Thread Jay Garcia
On 05.12.2011 10:39, David E. Ross wrote: --- Original Message --- On 12/5/11 3:28 AM, Ant wrote: Hello. Is there a way to remove the and symbols that surround the URLs with sending links through e-mails (right click on a link on a web page)? I find them annoying. :( Thank you in

Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-05 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Jay Garcia wrote: The user asked how to remove the and so maybe he has a particular reason other than conforming to line length and RFC's, etc. Maybe we should listen to what he has to say first and then we may be able to proceed accordingly, still keeping in mind that the suggestions are

Re: Removing and symbols when sending links through e-mails?

2011-12-05 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: The user asked how to remove the and so maybe he has a particular reason other than conforming to line length and RFC's, etc. Maybe we should listen to what he has to say first and then we may be able to proceed accordingly, still keeping in