WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/09/2015 07:01 AM, Daniel wrote:
Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:45:06 +1100, Daniel
wrote:
On 8/10/2015 5:42 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 8/10/2015 5:26 PM, Edmund Wong wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
the GTK3 built ver
Adrian Kalla пишет:
At the end we have some annoying GTK3 issues that somehow do hit just us
and not Fx mentioned in the thread "2.40a1 missing scrollbar indicator
arrow buttons":
They aren't displayed because certain (although most) GTK3 themes
request not to display them.
On Firefox that's e
On 10/09/2015 07:01 AM, Daniel wrote:
Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:45:06 +1100, Daniel
wrote:
On 8/10/2015 5:42 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 8/10/2015 5:26 PM, Edmund Wong wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
the GTK3 built version of 2.39.
T
Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:45:06 +1100, Daniel
wrote:
On 8/10/2015 5:42 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 8/10/2015 5:26 PM, Edmund Wong wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
the GTK3 built version of 2.39.
TB and Firefox backed out the necessary
Adrian Kalla wrote:
W dniu 10/09/2015 o 05:26 AM, Adrian Kalla pisze:
W dniu 10/08/2015 o 08:45 AM, Daniel pisze:
Hmm! Cannot see 2.39 listed on
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/
Hmmm, maybe ewong was talking about self-compiled builds?
Or mine that I post here:
https://l10n.moz
W dniu 10/09/2015 o 05:29 AM, Adrian Kalla pisze:
> W dniu 10/08/2015 o 08:26 AM, Edmund Wong pisze:
>> Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
>> the GTK3 built version of 2.39.
>>
>> TB and Firefox backed out the necessary manifests[1] in order
>> to build with gtk3 and I'm wonde
W dniu 10/09/2015 o 05:26 AM, Adrian Kalla pisze:
> W dniu 10/08/2015 o 08:45 AM, Daniel pisze:
>> Hmm! Cannot see 2.39 listed on
>> https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/
>
> Hmmm, maybe ewong was talking about self-compiled builds?
> Or mine that I post here:
> https://l10n.mozilla-comm
W dniu 10/08/2015 o 08:26 AM, Edmund Wong pisze:
> Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
> the GTK3 built version of 2.39.
>
> TB and Firefox backed out the necessary manifests[1] in order
> to build with gtk3 and I'm wondering if it's necessary
> for us to follow suite.
>
> Ed
W dniu 10/08/2015 o 08:45 AM, Daniel pisze:
> Hmm! Cannot see 2.39 listed on
> https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/
Hmmm, maybe ewong was talking about self-compiled builds?
Or mine that I post here:
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
_
Edmund Wong пишет:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
the GTK3 built version of 2.39.
TB and Firefox backed out the necessary manifests[1] in order
to build with gtk3 and I'm wondering if it's necessary
for us to follow suite.
Edmund
[1] - https://bugzilla.mozilla.or
On 8/10/2015 5:26 PM, Edmund Wong wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
the GTK3 built version of 2.39.
TB and Firefox backed out the necessary manifests[1] in order
to build with gtk3 and I'm wondering if it's necessary
for us to follow suite.
Edmund
[1] - https
On 8/10/2015 5:42 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 8/10/2015 5:26 PM, Edmund Wong wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
the GTK3 built version of 2.39.
TB and Firefox backed out the necessary manifests[1] in order
to build with gtk3 and I'm wondering if it's necessary
for us
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
the GTK3 built version of 2.39.
TB and Firefox backed out the necessary manifests[1] in order
to build with gtk3 and I'm wondering if it's necessary
for us to follow suite.
Edmund
[1] - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
13 matches
Mail list logo
