Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote on 17-06-17 00:56:
Jonathan N. Little wrote on 16-06-17 17:38:
Ray_Net wrote:
NO ! You are not responsible for that.
You should ask your sister to attach the .jpg ... instead of a
MICROSOFT_ONLY stuff.
If she is using Outlook I think it is going to be sent in
On 17/06/2017 8:56 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote on 16-06-17 17:38:
Ray_Net wrote:
NO ! You are not responsible for that.
You should ask your sister to attach the .jpg ... instead of a
MICROSOFT_ONLY stuff.
If she is using Outlook I think it is going to be sent in this damn
On 17/06/2017 1:38 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NO ! You are not responsible for that.
You should ask your sister to attach the .jpg ... instead of a
MICROSOFT_ONLY stuff.
If she is using Outlook I think it is going to be sent in this damn
proprietary winmail.dat format. My
Ray_Net wrote on 17-06-17 00:56:
Jonathan N. Little wrote on 16-06-17 17:38:
Ray_Net wrote:
NO ! You are not responsible for that.
You should ask your sister to attach the .jpg ... instead of a
MICROSOFT_ONLY stuff.
If she is using Outlook I think it is going to be sent in this damn
Jonathan N. Little wrote on 16-06-17 17:38:
Ray_Net wrote:
NO ! You are not responsible for that.
You should ask your sister to attach the .jpg ... instead of a
MICROSOFT_ONLY stuff.
If she is using Outlook I think it is going to be sent in this damn
proprietary winmail.dat format. My
Ray_Net wrote:
NO ! You are not responsible for that.
You should ask your sister to attach the .jpg ... instead of a
MICROSOFT_ONLY stuff.
If she is using Outlook I think it is going to be sent in this damn
proprietary winmail.dat format. My brother-in-law used Outlook and I
would get stuff
Daniel wrote on 16-06-17 14:37:
On 16/06/2017 5:12 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 16/06/2017 2:42 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Daniel wrote:
One of my sister's, on holidays in Italy a.t.m., has sent me an 5.8
MB e-mail with the Subject: of "three hot", the text of "Here it is"
and a 4.2 MB winmail.dat
On 16/06/2017 5:12 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 16/06/2017 2:42 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Daniel wrote:
One of my sister's, on holidays in Italy a.t.m., has sent me an 5.8
MB e-mail with the Subject: of "three hot", the text of "Here it is"
and a 4.2 MB winmail.dat attachment.
Are you sure
On 16/06/2017 2:42 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Daniel wrote:
One of my sister's, on holidays in Italy a.t.m., has sent me an 5.8
MB e-mail with the Subject: of "three hot", the text of "Here it is"
and a 4.2 MB winmail.dat attachment.
Are you sure that's her and no some scammer spoofing
Daniel wrote:
One of my sister's, on holidays in Italy a.t.m., has sent me an 5.8
MB e-mail with the Subject: of "three hot", the text of "Here it is"
and a 4.2 MB winmail.dat attachment.
Are you sure that's her and no some scammer spoofing her? Have you
confirmed it with her?
--
War
One of my sister's, on holidays in Italy a.t.m., has sent me an 5.8 MB
e-mail with the Subject: of "three hot", the text of "Here it is" and a
4.2 MB winmail.dat attachment.
With View->Message body As-> either Plain Text or Original HTML, when I
double click on the attachment, I get the
11 matches
Mail list logo
