On 4/6/2010 9:24 PM PT, Steve Wendt typed:
Does SM have a map of its versions? I remember it (and original
Mozilla
suite) used to, but I couldn't find it a few months ago.
The release dates graph.
No. We have no firm dates planned for anything, not even a good idea how
many alphas and betas w
On 04/06/10 11:50 am, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Does SM have a map of its versions? I remember it (and original Mozilla
suite) used to, but I couldn't find it a few months ago.
The release dates graph.
No. We have no firm dates planned for anything, not even a good idea how
many alphas and betas w
Ant schrieb:
On 4/4/2010 7:02 PM PT, Robert Kaiser typed:
Ant schrieb:
Does SM have a map of its versions? I remember it (and original Mozilla
suite) used to, but I couldn't find it a few months ago.
What do you mean with "a map"?
The release dates graph.
No. We have no firm dates planne
On 4/4/2010 7:02 PM PT, Robert Kaiser typed:
Ant schrieb:
Does SM have a map of its versions? I remember it (and original Mozilla
suite) used to, but I couldn't find it a few months ago.
What do you mean with "a map"?
The release dates graph.
--
"When an ant gets wings, it loses its head."
On 4/5/2010 11:33 AM PT, Bill Davidsen typed:
I have a better idea, release Seamonkey a few weeks early, then Firefox
can add fixes for the inevitable bugs, small or large, and 2.1.2 can
come out with the next Firefox. Or is it politically necessary that
Seamonkey always be behind?
Heck no. Le
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
I have a better idea, release Seamonkey a few weeks early, then Firefox
can add fixes for the inevitable bugs, small or large, and 2.1.2 can
come out with the next Firefox.
You mean ship SeaMonkey with more unexplored bugs, i.e. when the
platform isn't tested well enough
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
Some time in fall this year, we hope right at the same time as the next
Firefox gets released (maybe a
Phillip Jones schrieb:
Isn't the expectation that once 2.1 comes out that all using 2.0 should
abandon ship go directly to 2.1 and when 2.2 or 2.3 or 3.0 likewise.
No, not everyone can do that (some OSes supported by 2.0.x will not be
supported by 2.1, e.g. Tiger) and not everyone wants to jum
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
Ant wrote:
On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
We are just now at 2.0.4 and 2.0 came out in OCT. so four versions in 6
months me
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 4/4/2010 14:41, Phillip Jones told the world:
Ant wrote:
On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
We are just now at 2.0.4 and 2.0 came out
Ant schrieb:
Does SM have a map of its versions? I remember it (and original Mozilla
suite) used to, but I couldn't find it a few months ago.
What do you mean with "a map"?
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozi
MCBastos schrieb:
Also, there's no reason why the maintenance would have to reach the "9"
value before the minor version could be incremented. It might be that
Seamonkey goes from 2.0.7 to 2.1.0, for instance.
Actually, there will be some time when we release both 2.0.x and 2.1.y
versions in p
Phillip Jones schrieb:
Ant wrote:
On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
We are just now at 2.0.4 and 2.0 came out in OCT. so four versions in 6
months means one about every 6
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:42:09 -0300, MCBastos wrote:
> Note that this is NOT a strictly decimal system -- that is, any of those
> numbers can exceed one digit. Seamonkey 1.x, in fact, had as 1.1.19 as
> its last version -- under your logic, you would expect 1.1.10 to be
> called "1.2".
I blame Mic
On 4/4/2010 2:42 PM PT, MCBastos typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
We are just now at 2.0.4 and 2.0 came out in OCT. so four versions in 6
months means one about every 6 weeks. If that continues That will mea
Interviewed by CNN on 4/4/2010 14:41, Phillip Jones told the world:
> Ant wrote:
>> On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
>>
>>> Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
>>
>> Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
>
> We are just now at 2.0.4 and 2.0 came out in
Ant wrote:
On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
We are just now at 2.0.4 and 2.0 came out in OCT. so four versions in 6
months means one about every 6 weeks. If that continu
On 4/4/2010 7:10 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
Some time in fall this year, we hope right at the same time as the next
Firefox gets released (maybe a week or two later so our news does
Ant schrieb:
On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
Some time in fall this year, we hope right at the same time as the next
Firefox gets released (maybe a week or two later so
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 05:54:18 -0700, Ant wrote:
> On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
>
>>Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
>
> Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
It'll be ready when we stick a fork in it.
Phil
--
Philip Chee ,
http://flashblock
On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
--
"One day he sprained an ankle rather than crush an ant." --Les Miserables
/\___/\ Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal We
Ant wrote:
> I read that Firefox v3.6 is built on Gecko v1.9.2, and SeaMonkey v2.0.4
> is using v1.9.1.9 (Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT
> 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4). When will
> SeaMonkey be using Gecko v1.9.2 version for public stable release an
Hello!
I read that Firefox v3.6 is built on Gecko v1.9.2, and SeaMonkey v2.0.4
is using v1.9.1.9 (Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT
5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4). When will
SeaMonkey be using Gecko v1.9.2 version for public stable release and
any
23 matches
Mail list logo
