Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting

I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM, and as far as I know, it has never shown up on this support list, so I'm sending it again. Apologies if I'm the only one that didn't get a copy, and you've all seen it. I'll risk that this one time... Thanks, keith whaley original

Re: Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting

Keith Whaley wrote: I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM... That is an error. The date was 0/26/09, NOT 9/6. Thanks, keith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting

Keith Whaley wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM... That is an error. The date was 0/26/09, NOT 9/6. Thanks, keith As a linguist I'm always on the lookout for new vocabulary. Would you be so kind as to explain which month is zero? -- War

Re: Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM... That is an error. The date was 0/26/09, NOT 9/6/09. Thanks, keith As a linguist I'm always on the lookout for new vocabulary. Would you be so kind as to explain which