On 2/6/2018 1:47 AM, Wolf wrote:
Ant schrieb:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/06/quick-update/ and
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/05/next-release-is-2-49-2-and/
Isn't that great? New year, new hope, SeaMonkey is still alive.
Thanks Ant
Yep. No problems, Wolf. ;)
--
Welcome to February fellow Seamonkey devotees! I have performed a fresh
install of SM 2.49.1 today after a distro upgrade to PeppermintOS linux
8 respin 2.
All of my imap accounts worked flawlessly as I created each account. I
have generally stuck to pop3 access in the past, but I am finding
Daniel wrote:
> Ant wrote:
>> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/06/quick-update/ and
>> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/05/next-release-is-2-49-2-and/
>
> Humm!! Should we be worried that Ewong twice mentions "touch wood"?!? ;-P
>
Well... I'm always a skeptic when it comes
On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 7:01:52 AM UTC-10, Cecil Bankston wrote:
> My usual POP access to my G-Mail was blocked this AM, with a message
> referring me to the following explanation:
>
> > If an app or device doesn’t meet our security standards, Google will block
> > anyone who tries to
If web addons have to be implemented, could that veresion be SeaMonkey 3?
The 2.x versions have like 9 or so years that are developed:
I'm a blind user, so advanced things to me didn't affect me.
So what happen to the development?, Com on, sea monkey, com on!
Edmund Wong wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>>
Ant schrieb:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/06/quick-update/ and
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/05/next-release-is-2-49-2-and/
Isn't that great? New year, new hope, SeaMonkey is still alive.
Thanks Ant
Regards
Wolf
--
Linux Mint 18.3 Sylvia, MATE, 64-bit
Mozilla/5.0
Luis Carlos González Moráles wrote:
> If web addons have to be implemented, could that veresion be SeaMonkey 3?
If you mean WebExtensions as a SeaMonkey 3.0, that is definitely
a possibility.
> The 2.x versions have like 9 or so years that are developed:
> I'm a blind user, so advanced things to
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:02:49 +1100, _Daniel_:
Ant wrote:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/06/quick-update/ and
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/05/next-release-is-2-49-2-and/
Humm!! Should we be worried that Ewong twice mentions "touch wood"?!? ;-P
For some reason Stylish
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
sean nathan wrote:
Welcome to February fellow Seamonkey devotees! I have performed a
fresh install of SM 2.49.1 today after a distro upgrade to
PeppermintOS linux 8 respin 2.
All of my imap accounts worked flawlessly as I created each account. I
sean nathan wrote:
Welcome to February fellow Seamonkey devotees! I have performed a fresh
install of SM 2.49.1 today after a distro upgrade to PeppermintOS linux
8 respin 2.
All of my imap accounts worked flawlessly as I created each account. I
have generally stuck to pop3 access in the
I am valiantly trying to find a replacement for my wife's favorite email
program called Incredimail. Incredimail is (or was) a delightfully integrated
HTML email program that provided rich background templates and animated
emoticons, all in a unified interface. Alas, the program was sold and
djc wrote:
fayspace...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting the same nonsense from them, but
I have more than 5 computers accessing the same account plus 2 phones.
one is an android 6.0.1.
I used to think Google was one of the good guys.
Now, I'm not so sure.
Google "ceased" being one of the good
fayspace...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 7:01:52 AM UTC-10, Cecil Bankston wrote:
My usual POP access to my G-Mail was blocked this AM, with a message
referring me to the following explanation:
If an app or device doesn’t meet our security standards, Google will block
On 2/6/2018 at 12:02 AM, Daniel created this epitome of digital genius:
Ant wrote:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/06/quick-update/ and
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/05/next-release-is-2-49-2-and/
Humm!! Should we be worried that Ewong twice mentions "touch wood"?!?
> But when the demise of userChrome.css and userContent.css happens, I'm outta
> here.
It will probably happen faster in Firefox either by neglect or by design. We
could always try to load user js or css during startup.
Windows candidates are also now mostly there. Looks like I need to do the
Try layout.css.moz-document.content.enabled true
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Might be because of
Bug 1411708 - port relevant hunks of bug 1035091 [limit @-moz-document to user
and UA sheets]
but not familiar with it.
FRG
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:02:49 +1100, _Daniel_:
Might be because of
Bug 1411708 - port relevant hunks of bug 1035091 [limit @-moz-document to user
and UA sheets]
but not familiar with it.
FRG
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:02:49 +1100, _Daniel_:
Ant wrote:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/06/quick-update/ and
17 matches
Mail list logo
