I'm afraid I don't know the answer to either of your questions. The one
I am using is:
Restart Application Button 53.0
By Baris Derin
Restart Application Button lets you restart your Firefox and SeaMonkey
application by a quick toolbar button click.
This is in my list of extensions and it
Ah. I wonder what command it is using to tell it to automatically
relaunch. Does it work when SM is stuck and automatically tell its
startup's prompt to force exit the stuckage and relaunch? I get those
once in a while with seamonkey.exe process stuck even though I quit SM
earlier.
On
The restart application button closes SeaMonkey and then launches it
again. With the hot key you must start SeaMonkey manually.
Dave
> Ant wrote:
> What is the difference between than regular exit (I use its default
> ctrl-q hotkeys)?
>
> On 9/16/2020 6:02 PM, David H. Durgee wrote:
>> I use
What is the difference between than regular exit (I use its default
ctrl-q hotkeys)?
On 9/16/2020 6:02 PM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I use the "restart Application Button" add-on here for this.
Dave
Ant wrote:
You can't do a normal quit? Sometimes I can do that if it lets me and
still save my
I use the "restart Application Button" add-on here for this.
Dave
> Ant wrote:
> You can't do a normal quit? Sometimes I can do that if it lets me and
> still save my sessions.
>
> On 9/16/2020 1:29 AM, Szymon Stryczek wrote:
>> I have exactly the same experience (just on 64-bit Windows).
>>
You can't do a normal quit? Sometimes I can do that if it lets me and
still save my sessions.
On 9/16/2020 1:29 AM, Szymon Stryczek wrote:
I have exactly the same experience (just on 64-bit Windows).
Slowdowns start to happen around Seamonkey reaching 2GB of RAM usage and
they extend for me
I have exactly the same experience (just on 64-bit Windows).
Slowdowns start to happen around Seamonkey reaching 2GB of RAM usage and
they extend for me not only to tab switching but all, site scrolling,
mail sending etc.
"about:memory" + GC seems to help a little bit but honestly the only
Unfortunately this is my experience, too (on 64-bit linux)
I typically keep 8-10 tabs open, which a t the end of a day
typically means SM2.49.5 uses about 1-1.2 GB RAM.
With SM2.53.3 this balloons to 2.5-3GB - much higher.
There are also perceivable delays to switch between tabs.
I am not
On 9/9/20 8:06 PM, Mr. Ed wrote:
I noticed today while running FaceBook and trying to turn off Messenger
Active Status the screen went slightly blurry, the "X" in upper right corner
turned RED and the pointer became a spinning circle. Everything froze. I was
able to open Task Manager via
Yes. Same with YouTube, LinkedIn, Gmail, Twitter, etc. :(
On 9/9/2020 5:06 PM, Mr. Ed wrote:
I noticed today while running FaceBook and trying to turn off Messenger
Active Status the screen went slightly blurry, the "X" in upper right corner
turned RED and the pointer became a spinning
Apples and oranges.
IE is build into Windows and uses internal functions which are not reported by
the memory usage. It also does not support many newer web features which are
unfortunately memory hungrier.
SM 64 bit is around 300 MB from start with a few add-ons. x86 50 to 100 MB less.
Tom
On 9/12/2018 12:09 PM, Ant wrote:
...
Thus, the content of Web pages -- text, images, scripts, etc -- is the
major factor in sizing.
LinkedIn.com is the worse. Very slow, bloated, and a hogger especially
with multiple tabs. :(
Facebook.com is another one. :(
--
"You're kissing an ant hill."
On 9/12/2018 8:23 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 9/12/2018 3:13 AM, Tom Pamin wrote:
SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Tom Pamin wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>> Tom Pamin wrote:
>>> SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
>>> 55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
>>
>> Are you using any addons? I found adblock plus was memory greedy.
>>
> Just disabled Adblock
On 9/12/2018 3:13 AM, Tom Pamin wrote:
> SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
> 55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
>
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.4
28
On 9/12/2018 3:45 AM, Tom Pamin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Are you using any addons? I found adblock plus was memory greedy.
Just disabled
Richmond wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Are you using any addons? I found adblock plus was memory greedy.
Just disabled Adblock Plus. Usage went down to 364,000.
GerardJan wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Dear Tom,
I have a ¨top¨ attached so you can see how much /memory/ *seamonkey*
uses at my site.
I have 4Gbyte RAM and uses
Tom Pamin wrote:
> SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
> 55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Are you using any addons? I found adblock plus was memory greedy.
___
support-seamonkey mailing
19 matches
Mail list logo
