Re: Zonealarm Forcefield and Seamonkey

2009-03-17 Thread flyguy

Leonidas Jones wrote:

flyguy wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:

flyguy wrote:

After installing ZA Extreme Security with Forcefield, I discovered that
Forcefield doesn't recognize Seamonkey. Firefox 2 OK; Seamonkey 1 not
OK. I was fooled by all the ads and notifications that said, more less,
forcefield protects your browser!, thinking they meant *my* browser
and not someone else's.

I've asked ZA tech support about getting Forcefield to work, or if they
knew when Seamonkey will be supported, but no answer yet.


I have absolutely no knowledge of this version, and no first hand
knowledge of ZA, but I have never known of a firewall that does not
allow the user to select which applications have access, and which do
not.

I am quite sure the ZA tech's will be able to guide you as to how to
allow an application that is not auto recognized.

In fact I would question the wisdom of a firewall that is making these
decisions for you. I will bet there is a setting that will force it to
ask you for each application, allowing to decide for each application
as it tries to access the internet.

Please let us know how the ZA techs respond.


It's not a matter of access to the internet, which might be easier to
fix. Forcefield is just an additional part of ZA security suite. It
appears to run the browser in it's own virtual machine (approximately,
not an exact description), so malware can not affect your machine, only
the virtual one. When you terminate the Forcefield protected session,
everything is gone - malware, cookies, disk files (wiped, apparently,
not just deleted). I assume you can deliberately save some things.

Seamonkey still works perfectly, Za just won't run it in the virtual
space provided by Forcefield. I'll let you know what ZA says. I'm hoping
they will provide for it, since the Forcefield approach sounds like a
useful one.


Thank you for that, and I am sorry if I have muddied the waters. I will 
be most interested in what the ZA techs have to say. It does sound like 
an interesting concept, perhaps there is some way you can add SeaMonkey 
to the list.


Their reply was a non-committal we're looking at it, and that they 
will definitely continue to cover Firefox. So, for the occasional time 
when Forcefield is useful, I'll use IE.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Zonealarm Forcefield and Seamonkey

2009-03-13 Thread flyguy
After installing ZA Extreme Security with Forcefield, I discovered that 
Forcefield doesn't recognize Seamonkey. Firefox 2 OK; Seamonkey 1 not 
OK. I was fooled by all the ads and notifications that said, more less, 
forcefield protects your browser!, thinking they meant *my* browser 
and not someone else's.


I've asked ZA tech support about getting Forcefield to work, or if they 
knew when Seamonkey will be supported, but no answer yet.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Zonealarm Forcefield and Seamonkey

2009-03-13 Thread Leonidas Jones

flyguy wrote:

After installing ZA Extreme Security with Forcefield, I discovered that
Forcefield doesn't recognize Seamonkey. Firefox 2 OK; Seamonkey 1 not
OK. I was fooled by all the ads and notifications that said, more less,
forcefield protects your browser!, thinking they meant *my* browser
and not someone else's.

I've asked ZA tech support about getting Forcefield to work, or if they
knew when Seamonkey will be supported, but no answer yet.


I have absolutely no knowledge of this version, and no first hand 
knowledge of ZA, but I have never known of a firewall that does not 
allow the user to select which applications have access, and which do not.


I am quite sure the ZA tech's will be able to guide you as to how to 
allow an application that is not auto recognized.


In fact I would question the wisdom of a firewall that is making these 
decisions for you. I will bet there is a setting that will force it to 
ask you for each application, allowing to decide for each application as 
it tries to access the internet.


Please let us know how the ZA techs respond.

Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Zonealarm Forcefield and Seamonkey

2009-03-13 Thread flyguy

Leonidas Jones wrote:

flyguy wrote:

After installing ZA Extreme Security with Forcefield, I discovered that
Forcefield doesn't recognize Seamonkey. Firefox 2 OK; Seamonkey 1 not
OK. I was fooled by all the ads and notifications that said, more less,
forcefield protects your browser!, thinking they meant *my* browser
and not someone else's.

I've asked ZA tech support about getting Forcefield to work, or if they
knew when Seamonkey will be supported, but no answer yet.


I have absolutely no knowledge of this version, and no first hand 
knowledge of ZA, but I have never known of a firewall that does not 
allow the user to select which applications have access, and which do not.


I am quite sure the ZA tech's will be able to guide you as to how to 
allow an application that is not auto recognized.


In fact I would question the wisdom of a firewall that is making these 
decisions for you. I will bet there is a setting that will force it to 
ask you for each application, allowing to decide for each application as 
it tries to access the internet.


Please let us know how the ZA techs respond.


It's not a matter of access to the internet, which might be easier to 
fix. Forcefield is just an additional part of ZA security suite. It 
appears to run the browser in it's own virtual machine (approximately, 
not an exact description), so malware can not affect your machine, only 
the virtual one. When you terminate the Forcefield protected session, 
everything is gone - malware, cookies, disk files (wiped, apparently, 
not just deleted). I assume you can deliberately save some things.


Seamonkey still works perfectly, Za just won't run it in the virtual 
space provided by Forcefield. I'll let you know what ZA says. I'm hoping 
they will provide for it, since the Forcefield approach sounds like a 
useful one.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Zonealarm Forcefield and Seamonkey

2009-03-13 Thread Leonidas Jones

flyguy wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:

flyguy wrote:

After installing ZA Extreme Security with Forcefield, I discovered that
Forcefield doesn't recognize Seamonkey. Firefox 2 OK; Seamonkey 1 not
OK. I was fooled by all the ads and notifications that said, more less,
forcefield protects your browser!, thinking they meant *my* browser
and not someone else's.

I've asked ZA tech support about getting Forcefield to work, or if they
knew when Seamonkey will be supported, but no answer yet.


I have absolutely no knowledge of this version, and no first hand
knowledge of ZA, but I have never known of a firewall that does not
allow the user to select which applications have access, and which do
not.

I am quite sure the ZA tech's will be able to guide you as to how to
allow an application that is not auto recognized.

In fact I would question the wisdom of a firewall that is making these
decisions for you. I will bet there is a setting that will force it to
ask you for each application, allowing to decide for each application
as it tries to access the internet.

Please let us know how the ZA techs respond.


It's not a matter of access to the internet, which might be easier to
fix. Forcefield is just an additional part of ZA security suite. It
appears to run the browser in it's own virtual machine (approximately,
not an exact description), so malware can not affect your machine, only
the virtual one. When you terminate the Forcefield protected session,
everything is gone - malware, cookies, disk files (wiped, apparently,
not just deleted). I assume you can deliberately save some things.

Seamonkey still works perfectly, Za just won't run it in the virtual
space provided by Forcefield. I'll let you know what ZA says. I'm hoping
they will provide for it, since the Forcefield approach sounds like a
useful one.


Thank you for that, and I am sorry if I have muddied the waters. I will 
be most interested in what the ZA techs have to say. It does sound like 
an interesting concept, perhaps there is some way you can add SeaMonkey 
to the list.


Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey