I run FreeBSD, with JDK 1.4 (jdk-1.4.1p4_1) and 4.9-STABLE kernel.
Free *is* very slow for me but I don't see loads > 100%; in fact, the load
numbers always seem fairly plausible. Just a data point to tell you it's not
universal.
On Monday 10 November 2003 11:16 pm, Damian Gerow wrote:
| I'
Thus spake The Babbler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06:24:30 11/11/03:
: I run FreeBSD, with JDK 1.4 (jdk-1.4.1p4_1) and 4.9-STABLE kernel.
:
: Free *is* very slow for me but I don't see loads > 100%; in fact, the load
: numbers always seem fairly plausible. Just a data point to tell you it's not
: uni
>Thus spake The Babbler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06:24:30 11/11/03:
>: I run FreeBSD, with JDK 1.4 (jdk-1.4.1p4_1) and 4.9-STABLE kernel.
>:
>: Free *is* very slow for me but I don't see loads > 100%; in fact, the load
>: numbers always seem fairly plausible. Just a data point to tell you it's not
Here's what I'm running freenet on
Architecture and Operating System
Architecture x86
Available processors 1
Operating System Windows XP
OS Version 5.1
Java Virtual Machine
JVM Vendor Sun Microsystems Inc.
JVM Name Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
JVM Version 1.4.2_02-b03
Has any
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:38AM -0700, Todd Walton wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Todd wrote:
>
> > I've installed freenet-0.5.2.r1 on FreeBSD 5.1 with jdk-1.3.1p8_2 from
> > ports.
>
> Then you want the pre-NIO version of Freenet. jdk-1.3.1 can't handle NIO,
> I believe.
>
> Download, I th
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:57:33PM -, Matthew P. Cashdollar wrote:
> Todd said:
> > Thank you Matthew, that is exactly what I needed.
> >
> > I installed JDK 1.4.1 and wget, ran update.sh, changed java to javavm in
> > the scripts and it appears to be working.
> > I did set ipDetectorInterval=
forwarded
- Original Message -
From: "Uncle Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] help
> ok...it seems to be working alot better now. Stuck a
> pin throught my firewall, it hicupped for a whi
> > > For the first time today I discovered the right-click Menu on the View
> > > Freenetlog. I'm well trained. I don't expect a menu on a grayed
> window!
> >
> > huh?
>
> Up until this event (above) the only way I could get anything from the
View
> window for freenet.log was to mark it, then u
Any ideas? I don't really know the windows stuff...
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (no subject)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi..had a couple of correspondences with you and appreciated the
throroughness of the replies. If not you, one of you. In
>Any ideas? I don't really know the windows stuff...
>
>Hi..had a couple of correspondences with you and appreciated the
>throroughness of the replies. If not you, one of you. In the email you
strongly suggested
>that, due to technical reasons, i should uninstall Freenet. The problem is
>that eve
> Have you verified, using the task manager, that all processes associated
> with freenet is gone?
That shouldn't be necessary, if it is then Something Bad is going on
> Use the task manager to kill of any (or any unwanted if you run multiple
> java apps on your computer) java.exe processes and a
Something along the lines of: for win9x use "close program" dialog
reached by "CTRL-ALT-DELETE"; for win2k, XP use "task manager" (reached
unexpectedly or by right clicking on the grey bit at the bottom of the
screen). Kill/close/stop anything with "java" or "freenet" in the name.
I am assum
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave Hooper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Have you verified, using the task manager, that all processes associated
with freenet is gone?
That shouldn't be necessary, if it is then Something Bad is going on
Something Bad in a Java sense, rather than an OS sense I hope.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Hayter wrote:
| Something along the lines of: for win9x use "close
program" dialog
| reached by "CTRL-ALT-DELETE"; for win2k, XP use
"task manager" (reached
| unexpectedly or by right clicking on the grey bit at
the bottom of the
| screen). Ki
Whenever my downloads get to the 70-90% range, they
slow down to a crawl and just don't finish. I've tried reinstalling freenet and
fuqid several times. I used to be able to get complete downloads pretty
regularly before the last couple of weeks. Would it be better to use my
browser for retr
On windows a node does sometimes fail to shut down. And resource usage
seems to sky rocket. The rabbit disappears in such cases.
> [Original Message]
> From: Dave Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 11/11/2003 5:26:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thus spake "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16:34:02 11/11/03:
: >Anyone running under 5-CURRENT? It's good to see that it's working for
: >someone, just wondering if perhaps all the threading changes have made
: >a difference.
: >
: >Or maybe my node is just overloaded...
:
: if you've g
Set fuqids retries to about 25, basically whats happening is a
dissemination of data, meaning freenet is spreading the data making it
harder to retreive, using the browser to retrieve a file won't help your
efforts much as fuqid is dedicated to retrieving files from freenet a
mainstream browser isn
build 5032 - thanks for the info
- Original Message -
From: "Pete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:49 PM
Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Fuqid keeps stalling out?
> Set fuqids retries to about 25, basically whats happening is a
> disseminati
Hi,
good job !
These releases give me a feeling something is working and it is communicated
to the community interested in the information.
Toad:
> Freenet stable build 5032 is now available. Use your update utility to
> upgrade (freenet-webinstall.exe or update.sh depending on platform). It
> i
20 matches
Mail list logo
