On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:31:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
==BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:16:31 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:10:36PM -0500, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 11:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just do not know, where to report this, (probably it was noticed already
anyway...), but the bandwith limiting in unstable version 6430 seems to be broken:
Current
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:29:35AM -0600, Chris wrote:
I used to use Freenet on a dialup modem with only my OpenBSD firewall/NAT
box between me and the internet (my ISP just did straight packet passing,
back then). This was 1999-2000-ish :)
Back then, Freenet and fproxy were CLI only, but
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:51:30PM +, Roger Hayter wrote:
Can anyone advise me where I might start looking to modify a node so it
rejects all requests outside a small area of keyspace? I presume there
must be a routine that accepts requests for further processing, and one
it could call
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:31:48PM +, Roger Hayter wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen
Mollett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi,
--- Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some
popular boards seem
almost all to be retrievable both from the
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:01:19PM +, Stephen Mollett wrote:
Hi,
--- Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some
popular boards seem
almost all to be retrievable both from the stable
and the unstable
network? ... doesn't this suggest
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:15AM +, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:01:19PM +, Stephen Mollett wrote:
Hi,
--- Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some
popular boards seem
almost all to be retrievable both from the