On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:31:48PM +0000, Roger Hayter wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephen > Mollett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >Hi, > > > >--- Roger Hayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some > >>popular boards seem > >>almost all to be retrievable both from the "stable" > >>and the "unstable" > >>network? ... doesn't this suggest that some nodes > >must be > >>connecting to both networks? > > > >I haven't noticed this (I've never had much luck with > >Frost) but are you using two totally separate nodes > >for browsing? > > Yes > > > >If you're just switching one node > >between the networks then, after switching, the > >datastore will still have the messages cached after > >they were retrieved on the other network. > > > >On the same topic, would it be a good idea (or indeed > >feasible) to run two nodes, one on each network, with > >the same datastore encryption key, which are > >periodically stopped and synchronised in order to > >narrow the schism between the networks and aid the > >flow of content? > > > >Regards, > >Stephen > > > Perhaps people doing this is one possible explanation of my observation.
More likely is simply that we get new nodes migrating from stable to unstable constantly, bringing their datastore with them. > > > > > > > >===== > > -- > Roger Hayter > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support