On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:00:11 +0100
Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup. This means that the newest item in your datastore has a timestamp
that is larger than what your current system clock says the time is.
Have you modified the clock on the machine or similar recently?
I recommend
Hello,
I'd like to help freenet creating a translated into french website, and
also writing so docs or HOWTO etc.
BTW, I've already written some articles about freenet such as
http://www.linuxfrench.net/article.php?id_article=597 but the comments are
we dont understand anything on the website or
Hello,
I'd like to help freenet creating a translated into french
website, and also writing so docs or HOWTO etc.
Wonderful
BTW, I've already written some articles about freenet such as
http://www.linuxfrench.net/article.php? id_article=597 but the
comments are we dont understand
I would suggest the project leader Ian Clarke,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He will most likely read your mail very soon.
:)
It seems this email adress is invalid.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Got the windows webinstall executable and ran it less than 2 hours
ago. Node may or may not be running ok, but fproxy is definitely on
the blink. Looked at (without altering) the options, and nothing is
obviously bad, such as say fproxy being turned off.
Symptom:
Server Error
The following
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:02:22 -0500
Paul Derbyshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at 127.0.0.1: in ie 6.x. I know my ISP (cable) has some sort of
wonky caching of web pages, as evidenced by intermittent random 500-
series errors I never got on dial-up and the odd out-of-date page
coming up
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:36:38 -0500, Paul Derbyshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lastly, is this port being exposed to the Internet going to pose
a security risk, or is the fproxy service reasonably robust against
the usual things, e.g. buffer overflow exploits. The only thing I can
That's
I never changed the browser configuration when I went from dial-up to
cable. Then again, since it is a Microsoft product, maybe it's going
around changing things behind my back and exercising more autonomy
than it should. I'll check...
All there is in LAN settings (which I assume will be
Hi,
I'm still getting many of these:
jobPartDone(431) on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection:
CLOSED,[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(*removed*)],
sock=[Socket[addr=/*removed*,port=*removed*,localport=*removed*]],
Dear Sir/Madam
We are maintaining a database of free softwares for general purpose
(www.imtech.res.in) which are available free of cost for general user
and academic community. The aim of this project is to help the scientific
community in distributing these software. We are a academic institute
Thank you.
The actual version of the software was 0.4. We are way behind 1.0, let
alone 4.0.
The current officially released version is 0.5.2, which you can get from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-0.5.2.1.tar.gz (for *nix), or
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:56:22 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may redistribute, repackage, and modify freenet as much as you like
under the terms of the GNU General Public License;
I've thought about this since yesterday's mail debate regarding signatures:
Freenet will fail its purpose
Freenet stable build 5061 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users
Hi:
Using build 6441, and fred said:
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 15 in queue, 6701 millis since enqueued
last item, 291589 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug.
Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel.
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 6 in
14 matches
Mail list logo
