; Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
---
My skills and contact info: http://www.blcss.com/rowland/contactme.php
Public Freenet gateway: http://www.blcss.com/fr.pl
___
Support mailing l
Now this will be backward compatible, right?
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 20:04, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Sorry, there isn't much solid documentation yet. I will write something
> up soon as there have been several requests.
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 02:35:22PM -0700, Vanessa wrote:
> > Anything you
This is the sort of thing that happens when you break backward
compatibility and/or interoperability. You throw away all the user base
and goodwill you've built up over the years. THAT'S suicide.
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 11:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Anyway, I won't argue on that because the dec
cept it will
> enjoy the new, better freenet, those who don't will continue to live
> in the past until they can be persuaded.
Persuaded how exactly? Are there guillotines involved?
>
> On 21 Aug 2006 13:18:13 -0400, Rowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> This
A me-too and a summary of the discussion thus far as I see it:
1. Breaking backward compatibility is a bad thing.
2. Saying you won't ever do it again is small comfort.
3. Providing a migration path would help a lot.
4. I don't care about the darknet. I don't object to its existence but I have
no
Now this will be backward compatible, right?
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 20:04, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Sorry, there isn't much solid documentation yet. I will write something
> up soon as there have been several requests.
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 02:35:22PM -0700, Vanessa wrote:
> > Anything you
This is the sort of thing that happens when you break backward
compatibility and/or interoperability. You throw away all the user base
and goodwill you've built up over the years. THAT'S suicide.
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 11:21, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:
> "Anyway, I won't argue on that because the
cept it will
> enjoy the new, better freenet, those who don't will continue to live
> in the past until they can be persuaded.
Persuaded how exactly? Are there guillotines involved?
>
> On 21 Aug 2006 13:18:13 -0400, Rowland
> wrote:
> This is the sort of thing that happ
A me-too and a summary of the discussion thus far as I see it:
1. Breaking backward compatibility is a bad thing.
2. Saying you won't ever do it again is small comfort.
3. Providing a migration path would help a lot.
4. I don't care about the darknet. I don't object to its existence but I have
no
Why do we need to reseed?
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 14:49, Toad wrote:
> Stable build 5090 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
> Please upgrade ASAP, unless you are using the unstable branch. You can
> do this on Windows by using the update option on the start menu. On
> Linux, OS/X etc
10 matches
Mail list logo
