Re: [freenet-support] Current stable build numbers

2004-08-25 Thread evolution
Quoting Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Setting up a wiki on the site to help with documentation and other > tidbits might be worth considering. I'm sure there are many non-coders > that would be willing to help mantain documentation and other > faq/how-to stuff. > ~Paul http://www.freenethelp.org/ i

Re: [freenet-support] Current stable build numbers

2004-08-25 Thread Paul
D]> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:44:40 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] Current stable build numbers To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, I'm already maintaining the Changelog, and one can see the latest (stable) build there...more or less. But, aside from one time (which was a pleasant surprise, but no

[freenet-support] Current stable build numbers

2004-08-23 Thread Newsbyte
Well, I'm already maintaining the Changelog, and one can see the latest (stable) build there...more or less. But, aside from one time (which was a pleasant surprise, but not enough to make my point unvalid), it's always me who has to do it, even with cvs, everybody (with access) could do it,

Re: [freenet-support] Current stable build numbers

2004-08-22 Thread evolution
Quoting Sonax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The change from stable 5089 to 5090 got me thinking if it should be more > easy for users to find out what the current stable build is. > > I know that if you follow the mailing lists or if you log into the irc > channels you can get it, but why not make it _ea

[freenet-support] Current stable build numbers

2004-08-21 Thread Sonax
Hi all The change from stable 5089 to 5090 got me thinking if it should be more easy for users to find out what the current stable build is. I know that if you follow the mailing lists or if you log into the irc channels you can get it, but why not make it _easy_ to find out what the latest stabl