Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out

2009-07-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 05 July 2009 10:21:08 user1 wrote:
 On Saturday 04 July 2009 07:26:23 pm you wrote:
  On Saturday 04 July 2009 14:42:13 user1 wrote:
There is no such thing as an unknown friend. If you just want Freenet
to work, use opennet. Friends are connections to nodes run by people
*you personally know*. Adding nodes randomly not only does not
significantly improve security over opennet, but it also sabotages the
network topology, as we discovered before we implemented opennet.
  
   I do not only want Freenet to work, it already is working, but I do not
   really feel as safe as the Freenet project should make you if you were
   connected via friends *smile*
 
  Not easily possible afaics.
 
   Here are some follow questions:
  
   How safe is it to use Freenet using opennet, how anonymous are you
   really?
 
  Safer than if you are using bittorrent/a web browser. Beyond that, well it
  depends on your opponent and how much he already knows, and your usage
  patterns, and so on...
 
   How safe are you, using opennet, lets say in percent? (provokative) :-)
 
  Percent isn't a measure we can easily compute. A theoretical measure is an
  anonymity set, but again it depends on the strength of the attacker and so
  on.
 
   Is Freenet only suitable for groups of people knowing each others
   personally in real life, to use Freenet using friends, like p£olitical
   groups etc. ?
 
  There are some cases/assumptions in which Freenet is fairly secure. There
  are other scenarios in which it is much less so. Sorry I can't give you the
  confidence you'd like. :| Darknet helps in several important ways: - It is
  much harder to identify your node, if your opponent is simply trying to
  find and block/raid/etc Freenet nodes regardless of content. - Local
  attacks are much less likely as the only people who can attack you are the
  people you've added manually; on opennet, it is possible for an attacker to
  get connected to you. - Any attack involving the attacker moving across the
  network and slowly homing in on an identity is much harder because the
  attacker has to compromise or seize nodes or engage in social engineering
  at each hop.
 
   Are individual people let out using Freenet, if they want to be as
   invisible as such a polit¾ical group, and are you really safe against
   being caught by it experts, who really want to catch you, if you really
   want to be invisible? - that is if you do not have friends in real
   life, which probably most people do not have.
 
  How many facebook friends do you have? Social networks *can* work once
  there is sufficient density. Right now Freenet is quite small, quite slow,
  and has relatively little content, and most people don't know anyone using
  it. That will change as it improves.
 
 Okay, do you realise, that we are communicating directly to you/me, not using 
 the mailing list ?
 that was not my intention *smile*
 
 If we, let's say is a h£ells a£ngels group of some 20 persons all only 
 connected to each others, does that mean, that we only are using the 20 nodes 
 all the time, not meeting any other nodes, if we are  only using darknet?
 A kind of closed freenet network?

Sure, closed darknets are feasible. But open darknets are much more 
interesting. One of the HA group is also a member of a different darknet group, 
so the darknet grows; more generally, your friends and your friends' friends 
are generally not the same, so it is possible to have a large network in 
relatively few hops, this is the small world effect. One key requirement is 
that there be many short links and a few long links, but what short and 
long mean in the real world is unclear; in routing terms, large differences in 
location, in real-world terms, probably a long link corresponds to a friend in 
a different geographical location, or a different occupation, or mostly 
different social circles, etc.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out

2009-07-03 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 02:23:42 user1 wrote:
 
 Sorry, I am working on a very enduser level.
 
 I am still waiting for a system to come up. so I can work on a friends level 
 (means invincible) - meaning to exchange nodes with friends anonymously in 
 a 
 proper way, probably  ver 0,8.

What do you mean by that? Do you have any suggestions for how to improve 
getting connections to your real-world or online friends?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out

2009-07-03 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 16:42:58 user1 wrote:
 On Tuesday 23 June 2009 03:23:42 am user1 wrote:
  On Tuesday 23 June 2009 12:54:02 am Juiceman wrote:
   On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, user1bq...@telia.com wrote:
I have been testing a fit-pc older model  as a mini freenet server with
success.
   
Just quite slow for administration.
   
I have noticed that a newer model is out (7 w power consumption):
   
Here are the specifications:
   
http://fit-pc2.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
   
Please note that you plug the harddisk into a miniSD socket, and thus
it is easy to switch harddisks - any 2.5 sata harddisk will do - one
for possibly private -or one for non private stuff.
   
Here is a minitest:
   
http://www.linux.com/news/hardware/desktops/18899-fit-pc2-ubuntu-deskto
   p- in-a- tiny-box
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or
mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
  
   Cool!  What kind of performance do you get out of it?
 
 I had power failure to day 23 june 2009, and my fit-pc mini freenet server was
 shut down.
 
 Half an hour later it was up again by itself running without me touching it.
 
 Here is some statistic from when it again was up running:
 
 Ubuntu 8.04 - 256 mb ram - Freenet ver. 0.7.5 - store size 20 GB
 
 Java ver. 1.6.0_07
 
 JVM ver. 10.0-b23
 
 Used Java memory 27.4 MiB
 
 Allocated Java memory 59.6 MiB
 
 Max Java memory 254 MiB
 
 Running threads 94/500
 
 Connected 19
 
 Busy 1
 
 Input rate 25.5 KiB/s (of 200 KiB/s)
 
 Output rate 26.8 KiB/s (of 50.0 KiB/s)
 
 Total input 21.9 MiB (9.25 KiB/s average)
 
 Total output 32.9 MiB (13.9 KiB/s average)
 
 Payload output 21.8 MiB (9.23 KiB/sec) (66 %)
 
 # 1222  build 01222
 # 26r23771
 
 So for the last some couple of months my mini freenet server has updated 
 everything automatic by itself without any interference from me, and kept 
 running and running

Yes but the Total Output is a little disappointing. Are you getting heavy CPU 
usage?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out

2009-06-24 Thread user1
  Ubuntu 8.04 - 256 mb ram - Freenet ver. 0.7.5 - store size 20 GB

 256 mb ram for the whole system?

Yes (http://www.fit-pc.com/new/fit-pc-1-0-specifications.html)


 With builds of the past month or two, ram usage is way down.  If your
 entire system only has 256 mb of ram, you could reduce Freenet's max
 ram to a lower number, perhaps 192 or 160.  I don't usually see mine
 climb over 128 mb here unless I am doing some heavy usage.

 Excellent news =)

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out

2009-06-23 Thread user1
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 03:23:42 am user1 wrote:
 On Tuesday 23 June 2009 12:54:02 am Juiceman wrote:
  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, user1bq...@telia.com wrote:
   I have been testing a fit-pc older model  as a mini freenet server with
   success.
  
   Just quite slow for administration.
  
   I have noticed that a newer model is out (7 w power consumption):
  
   Here are the specifications:
  
   http://fit-pc2.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
  
   Please note that you plug the harddisk into a miniSD socket, and thus
   it is easy to switch harddisks - any 2.5 sata harddisk will do - one
   for possibly private -or one for non private stuff.
  
   Here is a minitest:
  
   http://www.linux.com/news/hardware/desktops/18899-fit-pc2-ubuntu-deskto
  p- in-a- tiny-box
   ___
   Support mailing list
   Support@freenetproject.org
   http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
   Unsubscribe at
   http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or
   mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
 
  Cool!  What kind of performance do you get out of it?

I had power failure to day 23 june 2009, and my fit-pc mini freenet server was
shut down.

Half an hour later it was up again by itself running without me touching it.

Here is some statistic from when it again was up running:

Ubuntu 8.04 - 256 mb ram - Freenet ver. 0.7.5 - store size 20 GB

Java ver. 1.6.0_07

JVM ver. 10.0-b23

Used Java memory 27.4 MiB

Allocated Java memory 59.6 MiB

Max Java memory 254 MiB

Running threads 94/500

Connected 19

Busy 1

Input rate 25.5 KiB/s (of 200 KiB/s)

Output rate 26.8 KiB/s (of 50.0 KiB/s)

Total input 21.9 MiB (9.25 KiB/s average)

Total output 32.9 MiB (13.9 KiB/s average)

Payload output 21.8 MiB (9.23 KiB/sec) (66 %)

# 1222  build 01222
# 26r23771

So for the last some couple of months my mini freenet server has updated 
everything automatic by itself without any interference from me, and kept 
running and running


___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out

2009-06-23 Thread Juiceman
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:42 AM, user1bq...@telia.com wrote:
 On Tuesday 23 June 2009 03:23:42 am user1 wrote:
 On Tuesday 23 June 2009 12:54:02 am Juiceman wrote:
  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, user1bq...@telia.com wrote:
   I have been testing a fit-pc older model  as a mini freenet server with
   success.
  
   Just quite slow for administration.
  
   I have noticed that a newer model is out (7 w power consumption):
  
   Here are the specifications:
  
   http://fit-pc2.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
  
   Please note that you plug the harddisk into a miniSD socket, and thus
   it is easy to switch harddisks - any 2.5 sata harddisk will do - one
   for possibly private -or one for non private stuff.
  
   Here is a minitest:
  
   http://www.linux.com/news/hardware/desktops/18899-fit-pc2-ubuntu-deskto
  p- in-a- tiny-box
   ___
   Support mailing list
   Support@freenetproject.org
   http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
   Unsubscribe at
   http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or
   mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
 
  Cool!  What kind of performance do you get out of it?

 I had power failure to day 23 june 2009, and my fit-pc mini freenet server was
 shut down.

 Half an hour later it was up again by itself running without me touching it.

 Here is some statistic from when it again was up running:

 Ubuntu 8.04 - 256 mb ram - Freenet ver. 0.7.5 - store size 20 GB

256 mb ram for the whole system?


 Java ver. 1.6.0_07

 JVM ver. 10.0-b23

 Used Java memory 27.4 MiB

 Allocated Java memory 59.6 MiB

 Max Java memory 254 MiB

With builds of the past month or two, ram usage is way down.  If your
entire system only has 256 mb of ram, you could reduce Freenet's max
ram to a lower number, perhaps 192 or 160.  I don't usually see mine
climb over 128 mb here unless I am doing some heavy usage.


 Running threads 94/500

 Connected 19

 Busy 1

 Input rate 25.5 KiB/s (of 200 KiB/s)

 Output rate 26.8 KiB/s (of 50.0 KiB/s)

 Total input 21.9 MiB (9.25 KiB/s average)

 Total output 32.9 MiB (13.9 KiB/s average)

 Payload output 21.8 MiB (9.23 KiB/sec) (66 %)

 # 1222  build 01222
 # 26r23771

 So for the last some couple of months my mini freenet server has updated
 everything automatic by itself without any interference from me, and kept
 running and running


Excellent news =)
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out

2009-06-22 Thread user1
I have been testing a fit-pc older model  as a mini freenet server with 
success.

Just quite slow for administration.

I have noticed that a newer model is out (7 w power consumption):

Here are the specifications:

http://fit-pc2.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

Please note that you plug the harddisk into a miniSD socket, and thus it is 
easy to switch harddisks - any 2.5 sata harddisk will do - one for possibly 
private -or one for non private stuff.

Here is a minitest:

http://www.linux.com/news/hardware/desktops/18899-fit-pc2-ubuntu-desktop-in-a-
tiny-box
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out

2009-06-22 Thread Juiceman
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, user1bq...@telia.com wrote:
 I have been testing a fit-pc older model  as a mini freenet server with
 success.

 Just quite slow for administration.

 I have noticed that a newer model is out (7 w power consumption):

 Here are the specifications:

 http://fit-pc2.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

 Please note that you plug the harddisk into a miniSD socket, and thus it is
 easy to switch harddisks - any 2.5 sata harddisk will do - one for possibly
 private -or one for non private stuff.

 Here is a minitest:

 http://www.linux.com/news/hardware/desktops/18899-fit-pc2-ubuntu-desktop-in-a-
 tiny-box
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Cool!  What kind of performance do you get out of it?

-- 
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out

2009-06-22 Thread user1
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 12:54:02 am Juiceman wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, user1bq...@telia.com wrote:
  I have been testing a fit-pc older model  as a mini freenet server with
  success.
 
  Just quite slow for administration.
 
  I have noticed that a newer model is out (7 w power consumption):
 
  Here are the specifications:
 
  http://fit-pc2.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
 
  Please note that you plug the harddisk into a miniSD socket, and thus it
  is easy to switch harddisks - any 2.5 sata harddisk will do - one for
  possibly private -or one for non private stuff.
 
  Here is a minitest:
 
  http://www.linux.com/news/hardware/desktops/18899-fit-pc2-ubuntu-desktop-
 in-a- tiny-box
  ___
  Support mailing list
  Support@freenetproject.org
  http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
  Unsubscribe at
  http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or
  mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

 Cool!  What kind of performance do you get out of it?

I dont know how to measure that, it has been working constantly for  some 
months - just now 15 connections and 4 busy strangers is up - can se a 
completely new interface, nice.

I just check that the broadband connection is blinking all the time.

Sorry, I am working on a very enduser level.

I am still waiting for a system to come up. so I can work on a friends level 
(means invincible) - meaning to exchange nodes with friends anonymously in a 
proper way, probably  ver 0,8.


___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe