[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] slightly off topic: fat32 methods of keeping my store folder size

2002-10-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so (unfortunately) i am forced to use fat32 on my windows machine where i run my freenet node... right now here is the size info: Size: 391 MB (410,077,960 bytes) Size on disk: 506 MB (531,529,728 bytes) I would recommend putting the freenet datastore on a separate partition if

RE: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] slightly off topic: fat32 methods of keeping my store folder size

2002-10-28 Thread William_dw -- Sqlcoders
size vs FAT table size. Or something like that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:support-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Josh Steiner Sent: 28 October 2002 14:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] slightly off topic

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] slightly off topic: fat32 methods of keeping my store folder size

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Hooper
The negative effects are when you need to store large files, essentially the file needs to be broken up into smaller chunks, and so takes longer to store/retrieve. I don't think the size of your FAT table matters anymore, way back when it was limited and so you were limited by disk size vs