Re: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:09:47PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote: Niklas Bergh schrieb: Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1 one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can download it. Seems to be only 1.3.1 http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/wsdk/ Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows. But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I tried it under Linux it was _very_ slow (no JIT available). I tried some others JVM, and the IBM JVM for Linux appears to be fast and reliable. Sun JVM has no JIT under linux?! Can anyone confirm this? It seems rather unlikely... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:22:28PM +0100, Someone wrote: Herve Lefebvre schrieb: Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows. Well maybe there will be one in the future. But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I tried it under Linux it was _very_ slow (no JIT available). I tried some others JVM, and the IBM JVM for Linux appears to be fast and reliable. It is very slow, at least compared to non java apps. But the node seems to run much smoother with the 1.4.1_06 JRE. But I'm still getting some of theses: jobPartDone(473) on [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: *removed*local,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(*removed*)], sock=[Socket[addr=/*removed*,port=*removed*,localport=*removed*]], chan=[java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[closed]], peer=[Peer [DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* (1/3)]], outbound=[false]] but sendingPacket == null! Seems to be a bug within the mux code, maybe some sort of a timing problem due to my slow machine. But I really can't say more because I'm not a Java programmer (well I had to learn it for 6 months due my studies but the school dropped it because it is not really a programming language worth to use for bigger apps). Yeah, Fred is only 130kloc... -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
Herve Lefebvre schrieb: What kind of errors ? I already reported them here and mailed some log files to toad. or maybe a configuration problem. It is mainly on default configuration, I just had to reduce the max connections to 80 because of my cheap SOHO router. And with the builds previous to 5054 (the non mux builds) it run for days without errors in the log, CPU and memory usage was quite high but it didn't stall. I'm running with the IBM JVM 1.4.1 wich has (at least under linux) dramatically better performances than the SUN JVM. Is there a stand alone JRE from IBM? I just found the big JDK for Windows, which isn't good according to the readme of fred. BTW, I had to make some adjustements : The JVM is launched with the option to allows up to 200 MB of RAM allocated. I can't give it more than 128 MB because the machine it runs on is low on memory (256 MB) and has to run some other things too. I had to increase (currently up to 4096) the number of allowed open file for the user running the node. This shouldn't be a problem here. I had also to increase (currently up to 350) the maximum number of threads. Use threads actually stay below 200 on my node, but memory usage is still very high, seems like a memory hole somewhere. My node is now running with th last stable version since 18 hours without problems (except BW overload), on a K7-800MHz with 512 MB of RAM. It use about 30% of CPU. Well, my machine is an poor K6-2 300 Mhz with 256 MB of RAM. Just can't afford to upgrade it, besides everything else that runs on it doesn't have a problem with the low specs. I'll try the 1.4.1 JRE from Sun now. Maybe it is performing better. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
RE: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Someone Sent: den 16 januari 2004 13:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k Herve Lefebvre schrieb: What kind of errors ? I already reported them here and mailed some log files to toad. or maybe a configuration problem. It is mainly on default configuration, I just had to reduce the max connections to 80 because of my cheap SOHO router. And with the builds previous to 5054 (the non mux builds) it run for days without errors in the log, CPU and memory usage was quite high but it didn't stall. I'm running with the IBM JVM 1.4.1 wich has (at least under linux) dramatically better performances than the SUN JVM. Is there a stand alone JRE from IBM? I just found the big JDK for Windows, which isn't good according to the readme of fred. Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1 one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can download it. /N ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
Niklas Bergh schrieb: Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1 one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can download it. Seems to be only 1.3.1 http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/wsdk/ /N Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
Herve Lefebvre schrieb: Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows. Well maybe there will be one in the future. But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I tried it under Linux it was _very_ slow (no JIT available). I tried some others JVM, and the IBM JVM for Linux appears to be fast and reliable. It is very slow, at least compared to non java apps. But the node seems to run much smoother with the 1.4.1_06 JRE. But I'm still getting some of theses: jobPartDone(473) on [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: *removed*local,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(*removed*)], sock=[Socket[addr=/*removed*,port=*removed*,localport=*removed*]], chan=[java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[closed]], peer=[Peer [DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* (1/3)]], outbound=[false]] but sendingPacket == null! Seems to be a bug within the mux code, maybe some sort of a timing problem due to my slow machine. But I really can't say more because I'm not a Java programmer (well I had to learn it for 6 months due my studies but the school dropped it because it is not really a programming language worth to use for bigger apps). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
