They have two mechanisms for snapshots and so on... I submitted requests
for access to these about a year ago and occasionally get an update.
Most recently:
-
A new queueing mechanism for beta offerings is being developed
and
On 23 Oct 2005, at 18:38, m0rtal frei wrote:
> Hello Ian,
>
> Sunday, October 23, 2005, 4:47:19 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>> Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
>> download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
>> this but haven't got around to it yet.
They have two mechanisms for snapshots and so on... I submitted requests
for access to these about a year ago and occasionally get an update.
Most recently:
-
A new queueing mechanism for beta offerings is being developed
and
why not?
moreover, torrent allows making a "packs" of files, like archives, so
you can put all necessary files to one "snapshot" and download it at
the speed of light :)
> For 2MB files?
>> You can use torrent, for example :)
--
Best regards,
m0rtal
For 2MB files?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 08:38:13PM +0300, m0rtal frei wrote:
> Hello Ian,
>
> Sunday, October 23, 2005, 4:47:19 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
> > download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
> >
For 2MB files?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 08:38:13PM +0300, m0rtal frei wrote:
Hello Ian,
Sunday, October 23, 2005, 4:47:19 PM, you wrote:
Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
this but
why not?
moreover, torrent allows making a packs of files, like archives, so
you can put all necessary files to one snapshot and download it at
the speed of light :)
For 2MB files?
You can use torrent, for example :)
--
Best regards,
m0rtalmailto:[EMAIL
Hello Ian,
Sunday, October 23, 2005, 4:47:19 PM, you wrote:
> Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
> download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
> this but haven't got around to it yet.
> Apologies for the inconvenience,
You can use
Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
this but haven't got around to it yet.
Apologies for the inconvenience,
Ian.
On 22 Oct 2005, at 17:23, Kevin Bennett wrote:
> Trying to update to the latest
Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
this but haven't got around to it yet.
Apologies for the inconvenience,
Ian.
On 22 Oct 2005, at 17:23, Kevin Bennett wrote:
Trying to update to the latest
Hello Ian,
Sunday, October 23, 2005, 4:47:19 PM, you wrote:
Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
this but haven't got around to it yet.
Apologies for the inconvenience,
You can use torrent,
Trying to update to the latest node version by doing what I've done before,
i.e. downloading freenet-latest.jar from freenetproject.org/snapshots but
it's only arriving at 200B/s (Yes, B/s, not KB/s, I didn't miss out the K).
This is slower than downloading a file from Freenet itself :-)
Trying to update to the latest node version by doing what I've done before,
i.e. downloading freenet-latest.jar from freenetproject.org/snapshots but
it's only arriving at 200B/s (Yes, B/s, not KB/s, I didn't miss out the K).
This is slower than downloading a file from Freenet itself :-)
13 matches
Mail list logo
