On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:06:02PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> There appears to be no problem for transient nodes. And presumably most
> running permanent ones know how this thing works. Good luck.
The bug did not affect the freenet _node_, only the HTTP access. And
that is fixed now.
>
--
M
There appears to be no problem for transient nodes. And presumably most
running permanent ones know how this thing works. Good luck.
> [Original Message]
> From: GeckoX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 1/25/2003 8:37:38 AM
> Subject: [freenet-support] Always keep old freenet
Am 25.01.2003 14:37:38, schrieb GeckoX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hopefully with the problems that people had with 544, they shouldn't have
>any problem with the new 547 problems. Just rollback the build to the last
>known good build, 546 and you'll b
